Actor Steve Coogan, who has been fighting to uncover details on phone hacking by News of the World. (photo: Beacon Radio)
A court has ordered Glenn Mulcaire to disclose information on who gave him the order to hack the phones of Elle Macpherson and at least five other public individuals, including a Liberal Democrat deputy leader. The Guardian reports, “Mulcaire has lost an attempt to appeal against a court order obliging him to identify who instructed him to hack the phones, something he has resisted since February.” Mulcaire worked for News International and was jailed for phone hacking in 2007.
Leading the charge to force Mulcaire to share details is actor Steve Coogan, who was reported to be a hacking victim in 2006. According to Lisa O’Carroll, Coogan’s lawyers have argued, “If it were proved that the paper had instructed Mulcaire to hack into the phones of the six public figures, it would show that phone hacking was taking place on an industrial scale.” The figures are believed to include (in addition to MacPherson and Hughes) Max Clifford, a football agent; Jo Armstrong, a legal adviser to the Professional Footballers Association (PFA); and Gordon Taylor, former head of the PFA.
This is just the latest in a series of developments this week that have refocused attention on the phone hacking scandal. On August 18, former reporter of News of the World, James Desborough, was arrested on “suspicion of conspiring to intercept communications”—phone hacking. The Guardian’s Amelia Hill reports the charges raise the question of whether he practiced phone hacking techniques while in the US. If Desborough did, he would be the first News of the World reporter, who engaged in hacking in the US, to be arrested. [Desborough became News of the World’s Los Angeles-based editor in 2009.
On Tuesday, August 16, a UK parliamentary committee, the Culture, Sports & Media Committee (CSMC), which has been investigating the News of the World phone hacking scandal for the past months, released letters from various individuals involved in the scandal. The contents included a copy of a letter from Clive Goodman, a royal correspondent for News International, who was “sacked” after being imprisoned in January 2007 for hacking into the phone of someone from the Royal Household.
The letter led a number of people, who had been following the story closely, to call it a “smoking gun” because Goodman asserts in the letter phone hacking had been “widely discussed” in meetings.
In the letter, Goodman also details how he agreed to go to jail so News International could keep further details on the extent of phone hacking by News International media properties covered up. He was told he could have his job with the newspaper back if he did the time and did not implicate the newspaper. Despite engaging in the cover-up, he was still dismissed and not allowed to come back to work for News of the World.
Also disclosed on Wednesday was a letter from a law firm that many had believed had conducted an assessment of News International to determine whether others beside Goodman had engaged in phone hacking. The firm, Harbottle & Lewis, told the CSMC they were not tasked with a criminal investigation and never intended to produce an assessment that could be considered a “good conduct certificate.” In fact, they had been told to only look at whether News International had grounds to dismiss Goodman from his job. What they were tasked with doing was never intended to be a defense that could be submitted to UK Parliament.
Now, Telegraph reports further details on the extent of whatever investigation News International might have carried out. MPs have told Telegraph Burton Copeland, a leading fraud specialist in the UK, didn’t interview any staff of News of the World or study any emails sent by executives and journalists. Andy Coulson had told MPs Burton Copeland carried out an investigation and “files were opened up to them.” This, like many official stories in the scandal, appears to be false.
Each new detail on Coulson raises questions about UK Prime Minister David Cameron. Coulson was hired to work as communications director for Cameron on that basis that Coulson didn’t really know much of anything about phone hacking.
Also, a Metropolitan Police detective has been arrested for leaking details on the hacking investigation. It is unclear whether the detective being arrested was sabotaging the investigation or if the police detective (who is not named) was looking to blow the whistle on corruption within the Metropolitan police that related to the phone hacking scandal.
*
The Guardian has done superb reporting on the phone hacking scandal. Not only have they been on top of the story but they have also put together data blogs, as well as interactive features for anyone who wants to learn all the sordid details of the phone hacking scandal.
Here’s a visualization the news organization has put together, which will tell you when everyone was arrested and who was a victim of hacking before it became an international news story.
And, here you can see details on Cameron’s meetings with top executives of News Corp and News International and also what News International executives said when they denied hacking extended beyond “rogue reporter” Clive Goodman.




31 Comments

How much of this shit is going on in this country?
Very unknown. It’s hard for me to believe the FBI isn’t hiding details but the FBI claimed this week 9/11 victims did not have their phones hacked. I don’t know. I think we will learn way more about what happened in the UK before we get any information on what News Corp properties did here.
I just wrote on another post re the Murdoch hacking scandal that I do not buy it that the Murdoch conglomerate limited their dirty criminal dealings to the other side of the pond, and behaved with pristine ethics and integrity over here. Pull the other one, please.
But we can all guess that Murdoch has the “goods” on a lot of Very Important People, so Murdoch’s gonna get some protection because of that.
Whether Team USA will ever be told the real truth about Pirate Murdoch and his villainy remains to be seen.
Thanks for the post. It’s important for this story to be out there, and we sure ain’t gonna see much about it in the corp-owned fascist propoganda media in the USA.
Kevin some of the hacking has been by “lent” phones, where the victim was provided a phone. That hacking is easily understandable.
How about the other types of hacking? Methods and so forth. UK is GSM based and so is AT&T here in the US. Any tech info?
“Mulcaire worked for News International and was jailed for phone hacking in 2007.” And somehow no one asked him back then who gave him orders???
Thank you, Kevin, for staying with and updating the sordid and slimy trails of Murdoch’s many tentacles … what they have touched, contaminated and destroyed.
James Desborough has a rather lengthy record of questionable behavior and what appears to be a sociopathic indifference to the consequences for those whose privacy he has invaded, including, rather infamously, George Harrison.
It is seriously difficult to imagine that Desborough changed that behavior when “operating” in the US.
And, as you imply, those in high places in this nation, seem little interested in pursuing honest investigations of such behaviors …
Hopefully, as the Brits pursue the unravelling details, and culpable “operatives”, some will lead or “point” across the pond, increasing pressure upon those agencies charged, under such rule of law as remains, with following the trails where-ever and toward whomever they might lead.
Breath Holdering is NOT advised, however.
DW
good question
like your handle too
wow, that’s the first time i’ve ever gotten an unsummoned emoticon here
I got one yesterday and I love the little yellow smiley face.
Since when should News Corp be entitled to hold VHF TV licenses, a disreputable law breaking company. But the FCC will do nothing. You do not have to watch.
Glad you’re keeping up on the story. US corporate media has certainly tuned out and decided to no longer pay attention.
Why only 6 people why not the royal family I’m sure they were phone hacked Prince Harry blames the Media for his Mom’s death any bets they knew where she was at that night she died fleeing the press because of a phone hack? I am sure tons of other famous people were hacked.
What about civil lawsuits and damage to careers Hugh Grant I am sure is not the only famous person who could claim damages.
In a list of worthless regulatory agencies, they certainly make the top five. (Yes, I know–why make a list of worthless regulatory agencies? Much easier to list the most valuable regulatory agencies, as if any in government exist.)
What? “Demodulation and RF Intercept Equipment”
How long? Watkins Johnson Product Catalogs. Oh, 1993 looks like a very good year. Take a look at page 10 and 11.
if this defense was offered in court or government by Newscorp then would not the law firm have had a duty at the time as officers of the court to correct the misimpression that their investigation cleared Newscorp?
I once had an email exchange with Jane Hamsher and in the last email I asked: What the hell is a Firedo Glake? She never replied, so I guess it will always be a mystery, just like “mank ind”.
As this story has been developing, I assumed “phone hacking” was something like breaking into someone’s computer or voice mail. Are we sure “phone hacking” is not a British term for “eavesdropping” or “phone tapping”? The way the offense is described under British law sounds like it is.
They had no idea James Murdoch was going to submit the assessment to the CSMC when he appeared before the committee last month.
It’s actually worse because in the case of Milly Dowler, a murder victim, voicemail messages were deleted so that she could keep receiving messages. That led her parents to suspect she might be alive and was not.
Outstan ding, FG!!!
Bey ond vi ew!
;~DW
Doesn’t cut it. One has to know exactly what the subscriber module frequency and SIM is to get to an individual level of communications.
There’s simple, low level human hacking (bribes) that can provide access to an individual subscriber, and that’s why I ask about what is known about Murdoch hacking methods.
I am going to take a little credit for myself here;
those who’ve been at the lake a while remember when I said;
“the real reason we do not want to allow warrant less search is not to protect us from things we did wrong it’s to protect our rights against those who would steal the information we’ve earned doing things right”
I also said “how can obama award telecom immunity when he has no idea what was stolen, by whom and who would gain from that information”
I told everyone we need to use the property perspective not the “private life” perspective
here we have murdock stealing the information which was clearly intended for giving his corporate contributors heads up information for bargaining, protecting themselves and for investment
I GUARANTEE this type of thievery WAS taking place during the cheney/bush warrantless spying scandal
Newscorps regular lawyers did there is no way that evidence was presented to the committee without a lawyer giving it the hairy eye ball first submitting evidence you know is not true is a big deal.
Take a bow Perris that does sound like you I just can’t remember what threads you said it on:)
Now we need to ask did Newscorp share this information with the government?
I think this was what made the Cold War so popular for the insiders. I also think that it has always been about this type of “Markets” (systems) manipulation as humanity has been on the Casino financial model for some time. So, the Cold Warriors had a sadz when their gig ended. Then they taxied around the tarmac for awhile to come up with the needed excuse to ramp it all back up but not until they had hardwired the systems for the spy sifting of data to ensue. Then– ta da– GWOT!
P.S. Here’s Watkins Johnson’s progeny.
It is damned unfortunate, mzchief, that such a profound ignorance reigns supreme regarding the “legal” inroads of technology as well as a studied indifference to the implications attendant to that reality. There are too many who yet hold Bill Clinton in an esteem he not only does not deserve, but which has been transferred, completely, to Hillary, almost solely because of her gender and her “victimhood”, as it is perceived to be, on a number of levels.
It is akin to the deeply, if not broadley, held belief that good and “decent” Congressional Democrats are being blackmailed into silent assent which, miraculously, renders them both blameless and noble, as mere pawns of some, as yet, nameless and irresistably powerful cabal.
Doubtless, Murdock and his minions service a vast network of interelated “interests”, global in its membership (and powers) at the highest reaches of many “governments” and only the mean suspicians of the members, of each other and their “activities”, prevents a seamless tyranny from blossoming, full-blown upon us, even as its supremacy is daily crumbling into frenzied and desperate acts of oppression and disenfranchisement, as we witness in numerous places throughout the world.
And yet the heaviest hand, still likely, is, as Kelly suggests, the simple expediency of bribery … from the halls of Congress to the “switchboards” of telecommunication “entities” and the thumbs on the scales of blind Lady Justice.
Despite the unreasoning fears of some, we are not yet in total thrall, and the cracks in the facade of BRUTE POWER are widening as the political “foundations” and the economic “piilars” of the elite shift like the tectonic plates beneath all the continents and the oceans of old mother earth.
We fleas, sometimes, imagine overmuch, both our of importance and our staying power …
And yet, we may have some time and possibility left, before the cockroaches take over our radioactive and glowing remains.
It is said that “chips” can now “think”. One wonders what it is they shall CHOOSE, someday, to think about?
DW
That is disgusting!
Dead soldiers’ and their families were likely hacked too.
Well, if you’re still following here, Steve Coogan might not be much of a name over here, but I think he’s widely known there, so there’s him and the others he named, Elle MacPherson and all, plus a steady flow of news over there about suits and settlements. Wouldn’t be surprising if the arrest of Desborough relaxed some more people enough for them to join in going after these bastards.
And Jude Law has sued them over here based on hacking he suspects they did of him in connection with a job he had here, on which he brought along his UK phone. That will give him and his lawyers the opportunity to find out and maybe bring out in open court or depositions some things about the US operations.
Just imagine the mistrust they have unfairly caused among these actors and their business people, maybe even their friends.
My bold:
(exerpt from “AntiSec hackers leak private documents of U.S. military contractor,” RawStory.Com, Aug. 18, 2011)
Mulcaire, hah! How about Jonathan Rees and some of his collaborators? Note that this story first ran back in June, before our attention over here was arrested by the murder victim case.
This is also one of the better hints I’ve seen of how widely the whole thing, at least in the UK, could spread.