Australia Prime Minister Kevin Rudd (photo: London Summit)Guest Post from Gary Lord, who regularly blogs at Jaraparilla, and is based in Australia. Follow him on Twitter at @jaraparilla
There’s been a sudden explosion of interest in Wikileaks cables down under, after every single one of the US diplomatic cables on Australia was suddenly released online to the public this week. While hardened Aussie journalists insist there are no major “bombshells,” plenty of intriguing new stories are now exploding onto the media landscape. Overall, the US cables reveal a sovereign nation absurdly subservient to US foreign policy, with Australian ministers queuing to discuss confidential party deliberations with their friends in the US embassy.
Previously, only a handful of US cables had been covered by WikiLeaks partners, the Sydney Morning Herald and The Age newspapers, both owned by the Fairfax media organization. Fairfax has faced prolonged criticism for not releasing original cables along with their stories. They defended themselves by arguing that there were more stories to come and they did not want to give the cables to their media competitors at Rupert Murdoch’s News Limited (who control a whopping 70% of the Australian newspaper industry). But that gig is now up.
A widely reported cable revealed Senator Mark Arbib, currently the Minister for Sport, was a ‘protected’ US source whose identity should be guarded. Latest cables reveal that US officials were regularly having confidential meetings with other government ministers, including Maxine McKew” (a TV personality who famously unseated former PM John Howard in his own electorate) and Michael Danby (a regular visitor with strong links to Israel).
The Israel connection gets another look with a cable revealing that Foreign Minister and former PM Kevin Rudd defied departmental advice when he abstained from voting on a UN resolution calling for investigations into war crimes during the Gaza War. This is only surprising because Australia’s UN voting record is slavishly pro-US and pro-Israel, on a par with diplomatic minnows like Micronesia, Nauru, and Palau. There is little public discussion of this in Australia.
Other cables discuss regional diplomacy, including former PM John Howard’s threats to leaders of the Solomon Islands, where Australia has spent over a billion dollars and eight years to achieve very little real progress. In Fiji, Australia and New Zealand acquiesced to US requests to “not rush” sanctions against the new military junta, for fear of undermining the war effort in Iraq.
John Howard infamously supported Bush and Blair’s invasion of Iraq, and is praised for regularly supporting unpopular US political positions. US officials particularly praised his handling of the local media over questions about the detention and torture of Australian Guantanamo Bay detainee David Hicks, who has just spoken about his incarceration on Australian TV for the first time. Another Australian detainee from Guantanamo Bay, Mahmoud Habib, has already received an unspecified sum of money from the Australian government as part of an out-of-court settlement that includes absolving the government of liability in his torture case. [*Note: Read this confidential cable where then-opposition leader Kim Beazley tells the US ambassador Hicks is "a ratbag who had almost certainly been up to nefarious things and should probably spend a long time in jail."]
Perhaps we Australians should not be surprised when, for example, our government discusses troop increases in Afghanistan with US officials, while simultaneously denying to us that such talks are taking place. Diplomacy, after all, has its place. But the broader picture painted by these cables makes Australia look like a pathetic US puppet state.
Meanwhile, with so many new Australian Cablegate stories still coming out, it’s hard to understand why Fairfax, who just recorded a $391 million net loss, did not publish them much earlier. One can only assume that they were under too much political pressure.
*For more on all the Australia cables just released, here is a round-up from Crikey.




17 Comments

And then there is the queue for puppet Prime Ministers in-waiting.
This cable reflects conversations that are two years old. How many politicians have now been vetted by the US? Who will our next Puppet Prime Minister be?
@GregLBean
The US government has a way of making Australian politicians feel like they have won prestige by kowtowing to the US global agenda. As this cable indicates, being a “top ten” contributor to the Afghanistan War is very important to Australian leaders.
Interesting, isn’t it, that Australia is managing to report on the content of the latest release of cables but that over here MSM reports are frantically focusing on the “Wikileaks has a leak/informants in mortal danger” bandwagon. Funny too how six months ago we were told that “Wikileaks dumps thousands of unredacted documents on the web and they’ve got blood on their hands” etc etc but now we’re told “Previously, Wikileaks released only redacted cables in dribs and drabs…”. Gosh, it’s enough to make a girl’s head spin – wonder if the population generally is picking up on this 180-degree MSM U-turn?
Yesterday I tweeted that I wouldn’t be surprised to read this headline “WikiLeaks Could Have Probably Maybe Leaked Unredacted Cables Accidentally.” I don’t know what the media has in the way of facts when they are writing these articles. There are only a few, who have actually tried to do reporting. Whether they have failed or not, most corporate media in the US are just parroting crap. Also, now, officials in the US are just repeating what they said in December. Except, it is interesting. You’re right. Now WikiLeaks worked with media partners back then. We are to be angry at them this time because they released the cables without the help of media.
Certainly, the gatekeeper media relishes the fact that government officials have got their back. The media covers foreign policy and the national security establishment favorably in most instances and the government ensures they have access and don’t have their role in society trampled on or denigrated by WikiLeaks.
Australia has a Minister for Sport?!? If that doesn’t play into stereotypes I don’t know what else would.
Yes, that, besides my 5, would have been my other snarky comment. How big are Aussie pols’ anal openings that they bend over & spread them so much for U.S. PTB.
I have been to Australia only once, for a weekend and 2 days of biz. It would have been right before the 2000 Olympics bc I brought back Olympic 2000 T-shirts as gifts.
Even that late it reeked of penal colony mentality. The sales force (Wall St; Equities Division) told me that prior to the coming of the Olympics there had been almost no al fresco dining, even though Sydney is one of the few places on earth with a Mediterranean climate that is just perfect for it. You see, prisoners & their descendents must be confined indoors for meals.
I’m sorry if I’ve offended any Australian firepups. Just telling how it felt to me during the short time I was there.
Had a partial day’s worth of meetings in Melbourne. Sydney is visually spectacular, Melbourne not so much. Sydney has creative architecture, including the bridge and the opera house, and interesting topography in its harbor & varying geographic features. Melbourne not so much: flat beach, uninteresting buildings.
Aye, that is a rum do, isn’t it, eCAHN, makes me think we need a Department of Hauls of Fame, Celebrities, Bobble-heads, and them with Henry the K-type gravaitas …
Ah well, we can’t have a Minister of Twitterdum, at least not “officially”.
DW
come on, now. surely you know that ozzieland has been a usa flea for decades.
i has always ridden on the usa dog.
most citizens of the usa don’t know that ozzieland was heavily involved in the usa invasion of seasia[aka vietnam war]. and most citizens of the usa don’t know that there were probably more demonstrations against that involvement than occurred in the usa.
still, the ozzie secret state has been pretty dedicated to silencing all those keen on ending this flea-dog relationship.
some may know of the ozzie involvement in echelon. which was intercepting communication traffic of citizens illegally long before anyone in the usa knew of it. long before the establishment of the fisa court, i think.
and we should never forget the nugan-hand bank. a money launderer for the outfit[s]. and a financier for the purchasing of pols[and i don't mean parrots].
some probably know of the brit special air services, special boat services.
but may not know that there are ozzie and kiwi branches of that “hidden” paramilitary. the ozzie/kiwi sas, sbs were all over iraq. then afghanistan. and recently libya.
in a very real sense, the usa should just nominate ozzieland as a u.s. territory. if not another state. sort of like hawaii.
A Minister for Beer.
Thanks for that.
I try to keep track of some of the ‘secrud’ relationships but there are so many I can’t do it.
I especially appreciate the Nugand Hand reminder.
That’s seems like the sort of thing that O might consider as his next stim.
WWII convinced Downunder that “Murkah” was the one to suck up to when the sun began to no longer smile on Merry Olde …
Always wondered if New Zealand was likewise charmed but know little of its exploits at arms.
At least Downunder treated that penguin reasonably well, I’ll give ‘em that, and the people, generally, have never seemed quite so keen on “Murkah” as the would-be toffs, ac.
DW
Hello? Minister of the Bahr-B.
Okay. Beer and Bahr-B, mate.
Glad that you Yanks still have a sense of humour!
You are right about the colonial mentality, though: a LOT of uninformed Aussies are very happy being closely aligned with Team USA because they think we need to align with SOMEBODY now that Mother England is less powerful.
Of course, that’s an argument that our Murdoch-dominated media also peddles strongly. The standard media false dichotomy is: “Do you wanna kiss Uncle Sam’s butt, or China’s?”
Oz Republic? Sadly, support for independence from the Commonwealth is falling, a sign of how threatened people feel by current military and financial “realities”. Meanwhile, our neighbours in New Zealand banned US nuclear warships many years ago, and somehow they are all still alive!
Thanks for reading my story, and thanks to Kevin Gosztola for the chance to post it at FDL – an honour to be published here!
I’m not sure the level of Australia subservience to the US is that surprising. Like Canada, I think they are likely playing it safe by partially pleasing the empire, while simultaneously trying to remain out of the picture so long as their economy is doing comparatively well (though Canada is more intertwined with the US). That said, their government is not exactly a champion of freedom. The center-left party has come out strong against Wikileaks from the very beginning.
eCAHNomics: your description of Melbourne and Sydney is quite different than what I’ve read and heard elsewhere about those cities, aside from Sydney having better beaches. I’ve heard the architecture and city planning is better in Melbourne and constantly improving, that it’s more European, while Sydney is chaotic and the public transportation is not as good, more American. Perhaps much has changed in 11 years.
Greeting from Australia,
Humour is important however progressives should be careful not to appear to talk down to other groups or people not interested in politics – referred to in your country as “joe six pack” “red-necks” and so on. Likewise those in Rome should be careful not to dismiss the colonies as hicks.
We in the colonies should not look down on the Roman proletariat because they appear to live on “bread and circus”.
Our elites who work for the Roman elite accuse those who speak against Rome of being elitist and out of touch with the common people.
I was writing something to send to a Romanian-American who wrote her masters thesis on the local media framing verses the US embassy framing of the death by vehicle [driven by an US marine] of Teo Peter – a Romanian rock star. Featured on Cables also. I was giving her background which is relevant to the above post and Kevin’s later posts on Aus. Also it is natural to love the place one is born and lives without believing in it’s exceptionalism or inherent morality. Romanian stuff follows.
Links below to your paper and some cables from Bucharest. I’m not sure that all the cables quoted by “Kamikaze” exist as they haven’t given the ID no and have stuffed up some dates.
It seems for the purpose of your paper is to analyse that the propaganda models used by either side without any attempt to state the facts. This makes some “sense” in the academic framework as you are studying ways of producing propaganda and not US-Romanian relations. Given your background – including relations – I’m assuming that you can understand the Romanian press’ point of view – even if their presentation was a bit histrionic,
So your paper is looking at how the Empire can frame it’s message better as even friendly natives get upset when one of them gets killed.
The history of a people affects their interpretation of events. For example Ireland was oppressed by England for 800 years – yet London was the “New York” for Irish intellectuals. In Ireland in the 19C the poor and agricultural labour lived on potatoes while the wheat was exported by the English landlords to England. When the blight wiped out the potato crop the landlords still sent the wheat to England as the Irish had no money to buy it. Hence millions died and emigrated to the USA, Australia etc.
So Irish people [even those in the UK] have some understanding of how 3rd world people feel-felt, despite imbibing Britisn culture. Ireland remained neutral in WW2.
Regarding the “friendly natives”. Since eastern Europe was released by Mikhail Gorbachov – and a very good thing too your rulers were as bad as many of the fascists juntas supported by the US elsewhere – the US has more die hard votes at the UN than before. One may surmise that it is due to your history that Eastern Europe allows US Black sites where people can be rendered if Egypt or Syria were not available. Most “European- first world nations wouldn’t allow that, even though the Irish were forced to let the flights land there..But we Aussies can not feel superior – we are lucky enough to have killed off [mostly by disease] and expropriated our Aborigines and we are sitting on a pile of minerals and have had the benefits of the Western Enlightenment tradition and law. So we have had it easy compared to most everybody else including east Europeans
********************************
http://www.kamikazeonline.ro/2011/03/basescu-un-milion-de-dolari-ironici-prin-pentagon-pentru-familia-lui-teo-peter/
http://trace.tennessee.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=2017&context=utk_gradthes
http://www.cablegatesearch.net/cable.php?id=07BUCHAREST1286&q=teo
http://wikileaks.org/cable/2007/11/07BUCHAREST1286.html
Something I wrote to make a point about Biblical language – while terrible poetry – expresses my feelings re US-The World relations and an upcoming anniversary..
A contemporary example of this style may read like this. Me writing as Isayit.
I-say-it 20:01
A great nation shall rise up in the West
and this Nation shall believe itself best
exceptional, truthful and just.
and indeed this Nation will be raised most high
with wealth and lust unsurpassed
but the whole world wide it will despoil,
with torture and fire, for 65 years
destroying millions of those who toil
while manipulating primal fears,
then in revenge will 4,000 of this Nation be killed,
In and without parallel – at home will they die!
at this their Emperor will eschew
the friendly mask and cry
“He who is not [with] us is against us…
We have no need for the UN
it’s ways are outside our ken
Who gives a f**k for the law
We deliver shock and awe
We will define who we wish as an un-person
who we will torture and rend
forever and forever without end”
I note your comment on the French vs Romanians. In my opinion, due to their history, they don’t bow before the angloshere – even their right – and they have their own imperial baggage. To give you some idea how the the left in the US empire feel I include the following links and bit and piece I have written for myself in the last year.
“Harold Pinter, the Nobel Prize-winning British playwright, screenwriter, poet, actor and political activist died last week at the age of seventy-eight after a prolonged battle with cancer. In his 2005 Parts 1 and 2…
http://www.democracynow.org/2008/12/30/harold_pinter_1930_2008_on_art
http://www.democracynow.org/2008/12/31/harold_pinter_1930_2008_part_2
http://www.zcommunications.org/american-decline-causes-and-consequences-by-noam-chomsky
I have been trying to write something to send to my family and friends to try and make them see that in the West – including we Australians – continue to act as if the Emperor is beautifully dressed and in fact believe it. Harold Pinter said it best in his Nobel Prize speech. See above.
What I have been thinking about has come out in my musings on your paper so I have let it flow. I understand that this must seem weird and disjointed – any way will probably not send and just file. This is from previous thoughts:
*************************
During my lifetime [born 1955] the following question was part of the zeitgeist How could it be that the German people didn’t know what Hitler was doing?. How could so many Western intellectuals support Stalin despite the evidence of the show trials?
I would ask: How can people who ask these questions be so unaware that we and they are acting in the same fashion as the “German people” and the “useful idiots” who supported Stalin and the Soviet model – even after 1956 (Hungary) and 1968.
I would argue that there is such as thing as facts and truth and that these things are open to interpretation. It is easier to rule people with their consent rather than against their will. Hence the importance of propaganda in both dictatorships and democracies.
I would argue that it is important to try and analyse what has happened in the past in order to understand what is happening now.
***********************************************
I was a member of “rent a crowd” [people who turn up to every demonstration] from 1978-82 as a left wing Catholic interested in Liberation Theology. Others in the committees I was on [Unemployed Peoples Union and then a Central American support committee] were from the Socialist Party (Stalinist) Communist Party (Pro China) and CPA basically soft post 1968 Euro communist party that I was the main Communist Party most of whom eventually joined the left of the Labour Party and the 3 warring Trotskyist Parties. Having read all three volumes of Solzhenitsyn Gulag Archipelago I was never a Leninist. F@. However if I had been born 10 years earlier I may have been ie. An anti-Stalinist communist. Just like those who experienced the depression felt that the USSR was the hope for socialism due to the evils F$ of capitalism.
Just because a person is against what the US does doesn’t mean they support the USSR then or Iran now. The fact Khomani made Iran into a theocracy doesn’t mean it wasn’t right to overthrough the Shar who was a US client installed by the US/UK in 1953 because the elected PM of Iran was being nationalistic about the oil. Like wise Saddam and Gadafi are/were arseholes but I don’t support US interventions given their history.
The people of Eastern Europe were oppressed by the USSR, however the rest of the world was[and is] oppressed by the USA. -see Chomsky article.
In a satrapy like Australia we are treated well and are very rich. We have to pay “protection” by sending our men to kill and die in Korea, Vietnam, Iraq and Afghanistan. The majority of Australians didn’t wish to send our troops to Iraq 2 and Afghanistan but both the “left” party and the “right” support the continuation. Parts of the “left” party spoke out against Iraq 2 as they were in opposition at the time – they are in power again since 2007. However if the ‘left” party had been in power in 2001-03 they would have been pro Iraq 2 regardless of the feelings of their base.
So we give a blood sacrifice for protection and pay our way by buying up US military hardware which is inter-operable. We also cravenly vote for almost everything the US wants at the UN. Even now one of the few who vote for Israel. Previously when in power 1983-1996 the left party showed a little independence and was a bit more sympathetic with the Palestinians by not being one of the 3 other counties who supported Israel outrages with the US . e.g. Invasions of Lebanon in the 1980s. Please note that before the early 1960′s most vetoes at the UN were by the USSR and since then most by the USA supporting Israel and apartheid South Africa.
This is a modest proposal I have been thiking up for some time [see Jonathon Swift's “Modest Proposal” - Ireland again]
I am thinking that we could just pay 50% of our defence budget directly to the US as Tribute, And hence not go overseas and kill people – our SAS are world class commandos with all that that entails. We could democratise the “blood sacrifice” burden by having a lottery with the people who draw the short straw being killed or maimed in appropriate numbers to keep our protector happy. This bitterness comes from having our Leaders telling us that we will stay the course in Afghanistan to bring them democracy and we are making “progress” which much of the left party and a significant number of the right party parliamentarians know is rubbish on all counts,
I moved thoughts on Eastern which followed up towards to start of this post…
f@ From Wikipedia While Khrushchev, the Communist Party, and the Soviet Union’s supporters in the West viewed the gulag as a deviation of Stalin, Solzhenitsyn and the opposition tended to view it as a systemic fault of Soviet political culture—an inevitable outcome of the Bolshevikpolitical project. This view, politically unpopular inside and outside the USSR during the Cold War because it ascribed to Lenin the theoretical and practical origins of the concentration camp system, has become the prevalent view of most writers and scholars since the USSR’s demise. link
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gulag_Archipelago#Khrushchev
F$ This review discusses this link http://www.sensesofcinema.com/2005/35/solzhenitsyns_children/