(photo: reflectification )The nearly two week occupation of a New York park near Wall Street known as Occupy Wall Street, initially undertaken by a few, has grown into a significant mobilization of people. The action should not have to be anything more than what it is at face value. The presence of hundreds if not thousands of Americans confronting a beast, whose greed, recklessness and illegal acts resulted in the collapse of the US economy, should not be something Americans show cynicism toward. Yet, some of the most politically engaged individuals are timid when it comes to the opening hundreds of young Americans have created.
A crowd has watched Occupy Wall Street pick up steam and grow in its power yet they continue to gripe about the occupation’s lack of one unified message. The message, however, is obvious: it is time for Americans to rise up and take on the injustices perpetrated and perpetuated by Wall Street. It is time to take on the culture of greed and corporate domination.
In an evolving document titled, “Declaration of the Occupation of New York City,” organizers recently declared:
As we gather together in solidarity to express a feeling of mass injustice, we must not lose sight of what brought us together. We write so that all people who feel wronged by the corporate forces of the world can know that we are your allies. As one people, formerly divided by the color of our skin, gender, sexual orientation, religion, or lack thereof, political party and cultural background, we acknowledge the reality: that there is only one race, the human race, and our survival requires the cooperation of its members; that our system must protect our rights, and upon corruption of that system, it is up to the individuals to protect their own rights, and those of their brethren; that a democratic government derives its just power from the people, but corporations do not seek consent to extract wealth from the people and the Earth; and that no true democracy is attainable when the process is determined by economic power. We come to you at a time when corporations, which place profit over people, self-interest over justice, and oppression over equality, run our governments. We have peaceably assembled here, as is our right, to let these facts be known.
Wall Street is America’s chief symbol of profits over people, self-interest over justice and of concentrated wealth over democracy. While millions of Americans struggle to find jobs, prevent banks from taking their homes, keep up with payments for student loans and get by on the minimal jobless benefits and welfare the government is willing to grant its citizens, Wall Street shoulders no burden. It enjoys millions of dollars in tax breaks each year. The corporations on Wall Street give executives bonuses that are grotesquely high, sometimes more than $10 million. Big banks are able to give their most senior executives these bonuses because the US government bailed them out through TARP in 2008.
Do “politically savvy” individuals really think a unified message would make the protest action better? Supposing they did line up behind a single bill or single action like, “Jobs Now,” would that really have produced the kind of mobilization of Americans that has taken shape?
Bumper sticker sloganeering has lost. Progressive and liberal groups have spent years crafting carefully engineered plans for making a dent in the corporate culture of America that has turned many aspects of society rotten. They have sat and considered what was “possible” in the system and lowered their sights. They have set the bar low for achievements and signed on to legislation with titles that would lead one to hope things would get better so long as they ignored the fine print in the legislation. They have failed to address the issue of money in politics for years. They have played the rigged game, participated in a broken electoral system that is now controlled by Wall Street and other powerful corporate and special interests and they have not acted upon the truth, which is that no matter who is put in the White House that administration will become a slave to dominant bureaucracies and corporations.
Some find it hard to support Occupy Wall Street because they are using the “General Assembly” process. The General Assembly is participatory democracy in action, with Americans involved in occupying Wall Street coming together to deliberate over how to maximize the impact of the occupation, how to reach out to unions and community groups that should be involved, how to produce or reach media, when to march, what kinds of actions to take, whether to engage in civil disobedience or not, how to respond to police conduct, what the occupation can coalesce behind and support and what sort of solutions they want to promote so society can become less controlled by dominant corporate forces like those on Wall Street.
The General Assembly gives American citizens a platform for sharing what they think needs to be urgently addressed in society. It offers Americans the opportunity to take ownership and responsibility in a way that representatives, senators and White House staff typically do not encourage because it would make it harder for them to be subservient to corporate and special interests.
There are those who claim the protest is just noise. They do not see any element of the protest having gravity in Americans’ lives. Phoniness and willful ignorance forms the basis for this argument.
A long-term protest by “dirty hippies” in a New York Park near Wall Street would not be growing in size by the day if it weren’t for the fact that Americans see how so many Americans have been exploited and fallen victim to Wall Street and corporate power. A major union like the New York Local 1 Transit Workers Union would not be endorsing the action if they didn’t see it having gravity.
This Tumblr called “We Are the 99 Percent” poignantly shows the anguish and despair of Americans and why people are finding hope thanks to those participating in Occupy Wall Street. Here are but a few examples:



If that doesn’t convince you the protesters have connected with poor, working class and middle class Americans, people who are “Main Street” Americans, here’s a 9/11 first responder telling his story about “working for the system” and getting “screwed.”
Under the mask and the glasses is a construction worker who was at the World Trade Center site the first week that towers came down. I voluntarily, on my own, side by side with the FDNY , NYPD and Port Authority officers dug side by side with them using our tools, our dump trucks, our cranes, our pick axes, our chain blocks, our oxyacetylene tanks to burn the steel, side by side with them as a First Responder. Ten years later, I can’t get disability for that. I can’t get workers’ compensation. I was diagnosed with Stage 2 auto immune disease called sarcoidosis.
The timidity of those who pay attention to politics has to do with reservations or utter disdain for protest. They are intent on judging fellow citizens who are taking on Wall Street greed and corruption. Would these people have told slaves fighting for emancipation that they needed to find a better slogan to support or else they would never be free? Would they have told women if you want the right to vote you may have to all wear the same upper class looking dress or they would never be equal? Would they have urged African Americans to not boycott buses or go on marches because it wasn’t clear how government would respond to their grievances?
Now, citizens rise up against economic slavery and they are supposed to get an education in public relations to win their support? The occupiers should not have to explain why they are out there better. The critics should have to explain what is holding them back from being a part of what is unfolding.
Americans protesting could admit they committed errors and leave the streets now. The occupation could shut down. All those who have donated money and goods to sustain the protest could be let down severely. Unions just beginning to take notice would wonder what had just happened. And as the people appeared to return to being tranquil and passive in the face of mass economic injustice, the corporations would have a clear playing field to deploy groups like the Tea Party, their shock troops for further dismantling America’s social safety net and helping corporations achieve more of a strangehold on this country.
The presence of Occupy Wall Street gives Americans the possibilities for change that were non-existent and unreasonable when the media suggested the Tea Party were the only people protesting. For example, getting money out of politics may happen because lawmakers want to defuse an uprising. And, if that were to happen, a celebrity or well-known pundit wouldn’t be responsible, a think tank or progressive interest group wouldn’t be responsible but the mobilization sparked by Occupy Wall Street would be responsible for awakening the consciousness of America and creating the climate for radical change.
Like the late people’s historian Howard Zinn said, “We don’t have to engage in grand, heroic actions to participate in the process of change. Small acts, when multiplied by millions of people, can transform the world.” Occupy Wall Street is one small act, a beginning and not an end, a possibly imperfect act that is righteously inspiring a morally justified rebellion.
People are finding they must have self-respect. They are becoming confident. They are rising up to transform the world. One can gripe and be seen as hesitant in the face of inequality and injustice or they can join the struggle and be part of forging a better world.



122 Comments

Thanks for all this, Kevin.
The photo you had up yesterday of the airline pilots marching…knocked me off my pins. The burgeoning union participation is a huge key, IMO.
What an amazing set up this is for October2011.
Oh, Kevin, that is so good.
Well put. Ian Welsh also commented on this in The reason many liberal and progressive elites (hate the occupy wall street folks…)
Great!
I have tears in my eyes.
Great post.
And they are beginning to shake of 65 years of fear induced by the hyping of foreign enemies. Not another generation living in fear of nuclear attack or terrorist attack or any other bogeyman. Not that there aren’t bad actors and risk in the world.
Well-done and well-timed piece, Kevin.
LS is covering the march — and is up for the moment.
Demand Bush and Cheney to stand trial. Just a suggestion.
The images are terrific and movingly bring home the importance of this action. I don’t think defensive gibes at those who have offered constructive criticism are as helpful, though.
LS chant:
Slowmarching. Tight formation. Excellent.
Thank You Kevin
No need to say any more.
See you in DC. I will have my bloody big Irish tri-colour flag there. You can find me that way.
LS: Someone drop the camera? All you see are feet.
Another camera picks it up.
All I want to know is how to safely contribute, (financially), to their cause? I’ve used “teh Google” and only found a few questionable links. Can anyone help me?
The protest in the street – on Wall Street and elsewhere in the country – over investment bank destruction of economies around the world has been the best news in years.
It is only in the street that we are heard – on line petitions, email, and even letter writing do little. Only in your face gets results.
Excellent, Kevin. Thank you.
That “better world” will necessitate treason trials for banksters and members of the corrupt political and media class.
Yup. They don’t listen. They don’t lead. They serve only themselves.
The people are choosing public action. What other choice is there? There is no other choice now. And the roots are deep. And global now.
I was never opposed to the Wall Street action, I just thought it was doomed to failure due to poor planning. Now, however, I see the action as utterly vital if we ever to effect any positive social change in the United States.
I don’t know if the action will “succeed,” but I do know that if it ends — at least if it ends now — we will be relegated to more of the same.
The Wall Street action needs to be protected and nurtured. Thankfully, a critical mass of people has ignored my original advice, and so far done exactly that. Anyone opposed to the action at this point is probably an employee, hanger on, or sycophant of the DLC.
I’m glad you’ve warmed up to the protest.
Thanks for consistent and informative reporting on this. Duly noted that the so-called MSM (aka, the USG/MIC progoganda organs) have pretty much ignored and/or dissed these efforts. I’m glad to see it continuing, growing, expanding and moving across the USA and the globe.
Way to go. Keep up the excellent work in reporting on this and best to those with boots on the street.
Power to the People! Get Up, Stand Up, Stand Up for Your Rights. Don’t Give Up the Fight!
The people have to keep trying different means of protesting. To not do so clearly will doom us to failure.
I was disappointed last winter at the paucity of coverage of some very large & well-attended protests in solidarity with citizesn protesting the anti-union busting that Gov Scott of WI enacted. There were quite a few protests across the country with large attendance, and some protests – not just in WI – went on (or on and off) for several days and weeks.
Per usual, the MSM propoganda either completely *ignored* these protests, or they chose to hyper-focus on a very very few, very very poorly attended (and probably paid for by the Kochs) so-called “Tea Party counter-protests.”
Oh well. I still believe it was worth it for citizens to join in the union-supporting anti-Gov Scott actions. One has to stand up for one’s rights, no matter what. To not do anything is to concede defeat. JMHO, of course.
There is a *lot* of paternalistic elitism going on in the “Pragmatic Left” when it come to #occupywallstreet. It is important to point it out in order to end it.
The same “pragmatic” types are attempting to dictate the way forward by using the failed framing and tactcs of the past 40 years. Their time has passed.
It is frustrating how many progressives spend day after day bitching on blogs but never take any concrete action, never join the fight … and then have the nerve to tell those of us fighting that we are doing it wrong. Just shut up. You either have core beliefs worth fighting for or you don’t. Bitching doesn’t change the world, action does. Constructive criticism doesn’t change the world, action does. Enough talking. Get out there and do something.
Amen. That’s what the Dem Party is doing. Tactics are old and tired and the young are badly needed.
Gitmo for the bankers and the torture crew.
great comment.
I don’t know how people who don’t protest can say “hey, you’re doing it wrong.” !!!
Not all progressives feel that way, but I agree that it can be frustrating to have some dissing efforts like this. Ignore the jibes and go forward with what you think is best.
Believe me, I’ve put up with gibes tossed at me for protesting for years in various ways, in various cities, for various causes.
The mocking and deriding one gets is part of the process. Stand up for what you think is right; do your best; ignore the gibes. Goes with the territory.
I think this action is terrific and wholeheartedly support it, but I’m utterly unsurprised at some who take issue with it. Standard procedure; be prepared for more of the same. Do what you think is best; ignore the rest.
And so: on it goes….
I guess it depends on how you or OWS define “success”.
Occupywallstreet has already succeeded. It has managed to communicate to the 99 percent through social media and the establishment has taken notice. Saying the movement may not succeed is not really true, IMO.
watajob – You can safely donate here: http://nycga.cc/donate/
When you look at the images of “We are the 99%,” the attempt to frame the protests as a bunch of over-educated college students and dirty hippies becomes truly absurd. Any so-called journalist pushing that meme should be called on it at every opportunity.
Oh, and Kevin, I don’t mean to nit-pick, and I don’t know if you quoted someone else’s transcription of the 9/11 first responder, but it’s “oxyacetylene tanks,” not “axiom settling tanks.” Although now I TOTALLY want an axiom settling tank.
Mayor Mike is crying tears for Wall St.
Agreed.
The movement is succeeding.
And these kinds of dismissive statements by the “establishment” are propaganda.
When all else fails, lie. When they have to do that, you know you’re succeeding.
I am with you ‘Dos
my heart is full – can not reach my kids today BECAUSE THEY ARE BUSY WITH OCCUPY AUSTIN !!!
one more great pic from us 99%
Mother of God!!!!!
Struggling to make ends meet?
Be nice to the banks so they will start lending again?
How come their ends are so much more important than our struggling ends. Every single time????
And what nice things and how much nicer are NOW NEEDED to get the banks to start lending again?
P*R*O*P*A*G*A*N*D*A
Another great and excellent truth-post, Kevin, about the real news that the American people need to hear, thank you.
Frankly, the real and important news is no longer about “who becomes President …?”, or “how awful Obama’s chances are …” it is about what the 99% have the courage to DO … now and henceforth …
BTW, a bunch of those “axiom settling tanks”, which dash mentions @34, would be a very good addition to the well-functioning BS meters of those who are “engaged” in manifesting courage … and everyone else still standing, or wavering, on the “sidelines” …
DW
OH! And where oh where is the banksters’ ONE SINGLE DEMAND???????
wow. wowee wow.
MB is one loyal friend.
Hint: it’s in your pants.
MB is one of them.
LOL!
In response to Dash@34(don’t get the linkage, sorry), the nitpick is totally in the disarming sort of youthful charm that typifies the occupation – not that they are not inclusive of the folk who have the tales of trouble and despair Kevin has presented above, but that they began as our kids, funky and apparently disorganized, like a toddler taking first steps or maybe a kid in his Dad’s shoes. But they are oh so quick learners, and they learn from doing, not from saying. And they are oh so obviously creative – that lovely poster of the ballerina on the bull, wow, that’s an iconic image!
So, we love them because they are our kids and what kind of a future are the PTB’s planning for them? We, their parents and grandparents should join them if we can, even only for the time we can spare. It will be a gift to us, not to them.
I think of what they are doing as a Grand National Shunning – it doesn’t need anything else than that they are there in opposition to the values which the PTB, headquartered in Wall Street have been trying as hard as they megamillionedly could to din into our unreceptive ears and eyes and (mouths) the ‘fruits’ of their labors: greed, violence, intolerance, fear.
We by our support for our young people say greed, violence, intolerance, and fear are sham values. Not in our name! Who are you going to protect, the folk hunched over the computers getting the wealth for the 400 who have as much wealth as the rest of us combined? The 400 uberwealthy? Or these lovely kids.
It’s not even a choice.
I.m with you, dash. I’ve been making do with postulates and a priori assumptions for years because I can’t get settled axioms
Some of the people in this OWS movement should use this forum to announce a run for office pledging no money from corporations or their agents, only individual donors and with a limit? They could start a progressive wing of the D party or a new third. “If good people will not come to the service of their Country…Others will.” John Adams. Also we need a Grover Nordquist litmus test for politicians who want our support.
Yeah, that’s what I meant. MB is a loyal friend to his bank buddies.
I’ve heard these kind of friendly noises from other people who sympathize with the poor banks who can’t lend money because they are oh so busy trying to deal with audits and regulations and stuff. boo hoo. It’s hard out there for a bankster.
I completely missed that when I read it. My biggest laugh of the day so far!!
Oh, the Banksters’ demand is simply, “More!!!!”, reader. (And they don’t care who gets hurt or killed … or “what” gets destroyed).
And the Political Class, which includes the Media, want “Order”, so that they can get on, unhindered, with servicing the demand of the Banksters for “More!!!” …
That “More!!!”, btw, includes more … war.
Simple, ain’t it? (Simple-minded and sociopathically selfish as well, leading to the destruction of Civil Society, which … um … more flesh and blood people are coming to understand every single day, all around the world …)
DW
My grover test would be to not receive a dime originated from anyone in the financial industry or listed in the Top 500 businesses or foreign money.
or something. feel free to refine the concept.
I love this comment. thanks.
I’ll correct. It’s hard to make out what he is saying in the video.
The scumbag Ed Shultz just said on his radio show that he will not cover wall street and everyone there should go home because they have no message and he also said he does not stand with them.
THIS IS YOUR LEFTWING MSNBC FOLKS!
Thats the kind of “family values” I can get behind. You should be proud.
The bankster’s one single demand is “MORE!”
seriously? link anywhere yet? ugh!
Yay, great post.
Bravo to all the occupiers + everyone who
supports this.
Nice to read about good developments for a change!
No problem. I actually found it hilariously delightful, because my degree is in math, and my first thought was, “That would have made my courses so much easier!” But then I graduated and got a job as a welder, often using … yup, oxyacetylene tanks.
How about no one with a six figure income or a big orange ING retirement number that they walk around with.
Ed Shultz. Dead to me. Cenk Uygur said the MCNBC execs openly declared to him that, “We are the Establishment.” Guess Cenk told the truth.
LOL. I said something like that on the previous thread. Totally clueless.
because, believe it or not, there are people with (low) six-figures who are in the 99% as well who do not move in the Goldman Sachs crowd. small business owners (I mean real small business, not Boehner’s small business) for example who want to pay their mortgages and send their kids to school and do their fair share.
BLOOMBERG: The protesters are protesting against people who make $40-50,000 a year and are struggling to make ends meet. That’s the bottom line. Those are the people that work on Wall Street or on the finance sector. [...]
This is really dispicable. His firm, Bloomberg LLC, is a large employer on “Wall Street.” (In quotes because they are in Midtown.) They are known in the industry to be below average on comp and for a poor work environment. If Bloomberg really wants to help financial industry workers “struggling to make ends meet” he should start at Bloomberg LLC! Of course the truth is that he is using low paid workers to create a smoke screen around rich banisters like him and his friends.
http://thinkprogress.org/economy/2011/09/30/333038/mayor-bloomberg-wall-street-make-ends-meet/#comment_link
this kind of blows me away. I mean, I know Ed is a blowhard, but wow.
These are clarifying times. Pick your side of the barricades, folks.
Oh, I see…And ED has a message? (comment to Ed, not lwr)
His very response to OWS shows that he has no “focus of substance” and appears to support false equivalencies.
He’s always rubbed me the wrong way.
yeah, totally disingenuous of him. You know and I know the tellers and the robocallers, and the other drones are part of the 99%. Perhaps someone more clever than I can leverage that point. It’s the MOTFU that they are protesting about and we know it and we know he knows it.
God, MB, stop insulting our intelligence! /rant.
I work on Wall St and make a low six figure income. I’ve been a Socialist since high school and I stand with you. Life is not always so clear cut.
what a blooper from Bloomberg
(and a lousy, cynical ploy) –
he’s usually smarter than that.
Thanks Kevin
he must be getting a LOT of calls.
There is only one side for 99% of us. Ed is not in the 1%.
Kevin, great to hear your voice on the webinar last night, great work here at Dissenter so thanks for the continual coverage of Occupy WS and it’s new brothers n sisters across the nation/
1) Young people? I was under the impression this movement was pretty well represented age wise young to old? As one of the one’s from 60′s to 70′s . . . we want our credit where due!
2) Who ARE these folks, aside from being centrist, establishment, MSM types and such, who claim there are no demands, no goals, no lists? I keep HEARING about this, is it a myth? A faux meme created to besmirch any and all dissent and dissenters?
It’s a tiresome meme, if not a faux one, and detracts from the efforts and issues at hand . . . I’d like to see the coverage of this Occupy Movement dismiss this meme, if it’s reasonable to do so.
To give voice to it seems to me to only reinforce it and the MSM messaging besmirching DFH’s and such . . . right along with the YOUNG PEOPLE ONLY myth, which also besmirches the movement and the efforts . . . .
But again, thanks SO much for your coverage and I wish you, FDL and all Baggers n humans safety and success in DC and everywhere for Oct. 6!!!!
We trudge on, together, all of us, because we must. To trudge alone is just too disheartening . . . I look forward to watching the ranks of Occupy grow and grow . . . .*G*
My intent with that was what if we had a group of politicians who truly represented the middle of the middle class that our fearless leaders would have to “deal” with like the “blue dogs”
We will have a group of politicians who support the working class as soon as we have a mass movement to empower/force them to do the right thing.
Does anyone know what kind of numbers are expected in DC in October?
You expected something else from the corporate media? Schultz found a broadcasting market that was better than sports. He has had his useful moments, but it has been all Ed-ego since his first slams at Air America.
Point taken.
You’re welcome, dosido, and likewise
Indeed.
By squandering his historic mandate and coopting any momentum for real progressive change – we have Obama to thank for these ‘green shoots’
of direct action. He’s revived the Republican brand and
he’s also given us this: people taking to the streets.
Fed up with the system he’s cynically exploited with his
bait and switch ‘messaging’.
WOW. Heads up, Eddie. Incoming in 5 … 4 … 3 … 2 … 1!
What an Idiot.
Actually, YSD is right. This movement is succeeding because people are being more cautious about hastily drawing lines with careless rhetoric, etc. Fighting for people even if they don’t yet realize who really has their backs. (Discipline, Petro… discipline!)
Either he thinks he is or wants to be. Either way suggests an extreme level of self-delusion. I’d say pathological, but IANAP.
ETA: When I say extreme, I mean more than the usual amount of self-delusion people have about what income bracket they’re in.
We seem to represent a larger voting population than Nordquist no new taxes tea party sect so what if we had an OWS litmus test for Democrats and Independents. If you don’t sign the pledge (whatever it’s final form might be) we run a candidate who will sign against you in the primary?
I just hope the liberal technocrats can be kept out.
I understand where you are coming from, but I think trying to turn this into legislative action too soon risks co-opting the movement. The main goal right now should be to grow the movement. After we get big enough, politicians will lineup to participate.
Lets be realistic. At this point there are only a few thousand protesters. We need hundreds of thousands.
up all night trapping a stinkin possum..true dat. Man they stink, ed baby is just a fat possum probably doesn’t smell much better either.
I am not too chipper right now, and am not in the mood to deal with ersatz bullshit from ed or anyone else.
After reading a lot of information about what is what, and whose agenda is destroying America..and the world..I can only come to the conclusion alluded to upstream. It is very hard to know who to trust. The only way I see it, is each of us has to be willing to search for and read all the information available. If I told you the British and specifically The Club of the Isle’s is responsible for a great deal of misery you would probably not believe me..so go read it and get back to me.
I know this..they want nothing less than to kill a great number of people…use your own intuition.
http://american_almanac.tripod.com/largest.htm
Thank you Kevin for a beautifully crafted and inspiring piece about the first *shots* of the American Revolution ver. 2.0.
I’ll be down there on Monday to add my support.
Zinn was correct… we need to have a demonstration of 10 – 20million people and then these deaf, dumb and blind thieves will get the message in no uncertain terms. Out of sight, out of mind.
We need to be *in their face* 24/7… until they go away.
There go my people, I must follow them for I am their leader.
You are 99% correct
Right, like the old bumper sticker: When the people lead, the leaders will follow.
That’s perfect!
x2!
Commentary on Bloomberg — I just put up a post. Why there isn’t a live blog yet.
I listened to his full remarks on this radio show.
Kevin – another excellent post.
again thanks Kevin.
cloudy days ahead banksters
squirrel that money away
hide it good
it still wont do you
no damn good
dye your hair
change your name
nothing ‘ll stop
this blues refrain
music don’t
pay you no minds
when the sun sets on
your fat assed behinds
Realistically, we need 170,000 in each of at least 218 Congressional districts geographically scattered so that it produces 60 seats in the Senate. That works out to 37 milllion more or less sympathetic to a reform agenda. How many activists would it take to turn out those numbers? Those are the numbers for an electoral strategy to make sense.
But the threat that that might really happen will create competition by politicians to co-opt the movement, which might produce the initial required results. The fear is there, but not enough to create political movement among elected officials–enough to try to marginalize or suppress the movement but not enough to make them flip.
Damn good lyrics there, Maddy.
My wife suggests that you pass this on to the 4 hip-hop supporters to riff off of.
ha ha thanks
Knocked it outta the park Kevin.. I’m buying pizzas for the front line in the park.
be my guest it is yours to play with. Sorry but I don’t know who that is..but they can have it. free gratis to all
I think that a lot of folks, like Maha, mean well — they just don’t get the point of what you’re doing.
Maha, for instance, is speaking from the point of view of someone who watched both the civil rights marches and the Vietnam War protesters, as well as the various movements of the past four decades. She noticed that the civil rights marchers got the sympathy of Middle America, and posited that it was 1) because they dressed soberly, in their Sunday best, and not in ways that would reinforce white American negative stereotypes of black persons; 2) they had a single message and stuck to it, not allowing it to be watered down; 3) they remained nonviolent at all times. The Vietnam protesters and most others since then violated Rules 1 and 2, and she believes that’s why they’ve failed.
Now, I suggest that her rules probably made sense even as recently as a couple of years ago. But not so much now, and here’s why:
Maha apparently thinks that the vision of Middle America hasn’t changed much since 1968 or so. But the hippy protesters of 1968, the ones that she and other commentators believe (and with good evidence) helped give the election to Nixon because they pissed off Middle America, are now themselves Middle America. They are grandmothers and grandfathers. Even a lot of their more vanilla age peers have loosened up over the decades; average suburban matrons are now getting incredibly intricate tattoos, acts that would have been considered shocking and deviant in 1968.
That young red-haired girl who got Maced? Maha thinks adult Americans will react to that girl the way adult Americans reacted to the protesters getting gassed in Chicago in 1968, or the way adult Americans initially reacted to the Kent State shootings in 1970. But she forgets that the people who were gassed are now among today’s adults; they won’t see the Maced girl as deviant, dirty or unworthy — instead, they see themselves and their own kids (or grandkids). They see an apple-cheeked, sweet, innocent, idealistic girl, being Maced for no reason at all.
Which brings me to where Maha and the OWS folks agree: Nonviolence.
By Macing the red-haired girl (and the other innocent, idealistic kids), the cops violated Maha’s “Bigger Asshole Rule”. They were the first (and so far only) side to resort to violence, so they get to be the bigger assholes here. (Speaking of “bigger assholes”, check this out: http://wonkette.com/453955/heres-the-video-of-those-wall-streeters-drinking-champagne-above-the-protest But I digress.)
Another factor: In 1968 and 1970, things were going really well economically. The postwar boom and the majority’s share in it was at its height because unions hadn’t been seriously attacked yet (or at least the effects of the attacks hadn’t made themselves felt yet). Many adults who remembered the hard times of the 1930s (and earlier if they were farmers who’d lived through the Farm Depression of the 1920s) and the harrowing years of World War Two, thought their kids had grown up to be ungrateful for what they now had.
Those conditions no longer apply.
It’s Depression Time again, and everyone who isn’t a one-percenter — young, old, black, white, Latino, Irish, etc. — is if not hurting badly economically him/herself, personally knows several others who are. The adults of 2011 aren’t as likely as the adults of 1968 to look at the OWS kids and say “what a bunch of ingrates”; they’re far more likely to look at them and nod in approval.
I’m basically in agreement with you, but I’m not sure we need 170,000 people on the street in every Congressional district (though that would be a beautiful sight). However, we do need a very large number of people across the country to stand and say they support this movement. Once we are part of the mainstream debate, we can not be stopped!
Thank you
He’s been all over the place, always noisily, as far as being willing to criticize Obama’s record or just be a Dem warhorse. But clearly MSNBC is a corporate organ trying to capture the liberal audience. I guess everyone is on a short leash now pending the election. Not surprising, but for me, anyone who comes out against this effort to mount some effective dissent is against me. Bottom line.
and me too!
Great Comment.
And keep the message fluid. Defining it limits it. The other side is locked in. Rigid, and you remember Kung Fu Kane(sp) saying paraphrased; “an oak branch snaps and a willow bends in the wind.”
This makes me feel like back in the day only better.
There are a couple of problems with contending that protesters need to look and act like middle America. First, as we can see with the type of people who show up at OWS, they are not Middle America, even if their origin *is*. The whole idea that we need to “pass” to be effective in society is part of the struggle. Women don’t need to be like men, LGBTQ folks don’t need to look and act straight, etc., It is not helpful to legitimize the hierarchy by demanding people be what they are not.
Second, there has been a dramatic shift away from progressive principles over the last 40 years. It is during those 40 years that protest generally and dirty hippy protesters specifically have been derided. Sure, that comes from the anti-war movement. However, with protesters so vilified, mocked, and deligitimized, street action has nearly disappeared from sight. There is a connection, IMO, between the loss of a vibrant culture of protest and the loss of progressivism in political discourse.
Let the hippies be hippies and let them march. They are, after all, right.
BTW, there was an awful lot of mocking of the Keystone folks who got arrested in khakis and loafers.
Someone was overheard to say something like that in Mrs o’Leary’s barn when the pesky cow kicked over the lantern again.
You get it.
The 99% photos are great, and I do wish that the ‘message’ was that clear and specific, targetting Wall Street/Establshment bailouts/greed/finanical fraud so plainly. But soley based on the coverage I’ve seen (Olberman, O’Donnell), the crowd’s signs were all over the place (Legalize marijuana, Gaza, anti-death penalty, etc.) just about any grievance one could think of. Doesn’t that confuse about the point of THIS protest? Sure it could be all of those things, but the banker/bailout protests feel very relevant NOW to lots of people, without letting the other movements tag-team on to what is supposed to be the message?
Am I missing something? I want this to succeed but also get the critiques.
Thing is, there is evidence that the late 1960s street actions actually hurt the protesters’ cause (as opposed to the civil rights marches of the early 1960s, which are often cited as textbook examples of how to hold marches). Middle Americans in 1968, as the links I cited show (this one and this one), didn’t much like the protesters. Many older Americans, who remembered how FDR brought them out of the Great Depression and who were grateful to LBJ for Medicare and other Great Society benefits, thought that the kids protesting had it soft compared to their own youths.
That dynamic has changed.
Now, everyone aside from those at the very top is in the same boat economically. The New Deal and Great Society are both under assault. We all — gay, straight, hippie, office worker, hard hat, teleworker, retiree — are seeing what remains of our futures get stolen from us.
And so the hard hats and the cops and the airline pilots stand shoulder to shoulder with the kids in the hippie garb and the drag queens in the heels.
We’re all in this together, and that’s been brought home rather forcibly.
SHUT down the Banks! Tax the living crap out of the Traders/traitors on Wall st., whose ONLY MOJO is $$$$ PROFIT nothing else, NOTHING!! They are enemies of LIFE itself and are through their indifference and their active intent killing the ONLY place in this Universe we can live. We need to set up a Revolutionary court and try these criminals ASAP. We need to do it in front of the whole world!
Perhaps the earlier civil rights marches were more effective because the PTB didn’t have the gears of the propaganda machine timed as well in the early days of the protests. The PTB got in gear as soon as they saw the power of the peaceful march and found effective ways to vilify and dismiss the protests.
Is this becoming partisan? I thought people who identify as Tea Party, whether they know it or not, are part of the 99% too. Are they no longer welcome? I thought we were only alienating hateful individuals, not groups of people based on politics, religion, etc. I liked the occupation better when it was non-partisan.
What Bloomberg means by that line is this: “Average Americans, the protestors are your enemies. Hugs and kisses, Bloomberg.”