Occupy Wall Street demonstrator shows support for Bradley Manning (photo: David Shankbone)
David Coombs, lawyer for PFC Bradley Manning, the accused whistleblower to WikiLeaks, reports the Army has finally scheduled a date for his pre-trial Article 32 hearing. It will begin on December 16 and last five days. Except for when classified information is being discussed, the public will be able to attend the hearing.
The Bradley Manning Support Network in a statement notes, “This will be PFC Manning’s first appearance before a court and the first time he will face his accusers after 17 months in confinement.” The hearing will also take place just over two weeks after the anniversary of the release of US State Embassy cables known as “Cablegate,” which Manning is accused of submitting to WikiLeaks.
To coincide with the hearing, the Support Network will hold a vigil on December 16, when he arrives at Ft. Meade and then a march and rally on December 17.
Coombs explains:
…The primary purpose of the Article 32 hearing is to evaluate the relative strengths and weaknesses of the government’s case as well as to provide the defense with an opportunity to obtain pretrial discovery. The defense is entitled to call witnesses during the hearing and to also cross examine the government’s witnesses. Each witness who testifies is placed under oath; their testimony can therefore be used during the trial for impeachment purposes or as prior testimony should the witness become unavailable.
The Bradley Manning Support Network asserts “the information he is accused of making public was wrongly and illegally classified, and that whoever leaked the information should be protected as a whistle-blower.” The information he is accused of giving to WikiLeaks includes the “Collateral Murder” video and a cable that likely “contributed to the early exit of troops from Iraq,” as it exposed the US military’s coverup of a war crime.
Additionally, Manning’s confinement has involved harsh conditions. At Quantico Marine base, where he was before being transferred to Ft. Leavenworth, he was made to stand naked and kept in isolation. In January Coombs described his treatment:
For 23 hours per day, he will sit in his cell. The guards will check on him every five minutes by asking him if he is okay. PFC Manning will be required to respond in some affirmative manner. At night, if the guards cannot see him clearly, because he has a blanket over his head or is curled up towards the wall, they will wake him in order to ensure that he is okay. He will receive each of his meals in his cell. He will not be allowed to have a pillow or sheets. He will not be allowed to have any personal items in his cell. He will only be allowed to have one book or one magazine at any given time to read. The book or magazine will be taken away from him at the end of the day before he goes to sleep. He will be prevented from exercising in his cell. If he attempts to do push-ups, sit-ups, or any other form of exercise he will be forced to stop. He will receive one hour of exercise outside of his cell daily. The guards will take him to an empty room and allow him to walk. He will usually just walk in figure eights around the room until his hour is complete. When he goes to sleep, he will be required to strip down to his underwear and surrender his clothing to the guards.
A Freedom of Information Act request revealed Manning was recommended for removal from “prevention of injury” (POI) status by psychiatrists and psychologists but was not removed. He was eventually transferred after State Department spokesperson PJ Crowley called his treatment “ridiculous, counterproductive and stupid.”
While his conditions may have improved, he was transferred to Leavenworth in April and it was thought he might get to begin the pre-trial process in June. The past months have seen Juan Mendez, the United Nations’ rapporteur on torture, denied access to Manning. Mendez would like an unmonitored visit as part of an investigation into abuse.
It has been 569 days since he was imprisoned. Coombs has previously demanded a “speedy trial.” The military has chosen to take its time in prosecuting Manning.
Recently, filmmaker Michael Moore suggested during a panel organized by The Nation that Manning, if he released the information to WikiLeaks, played a role in igniting the uprising in Tunisia that spread to Egypt and other parts of Africa and the Middle East. He talked about the fact that if Manning was responsible for the information that ignited these demonstrations than he is also responsible for the Occupy protests going on in the United States right now because those were inspired by the Arab uprisings.
The hearing will be the first opportunity the public has to see how Manning’s defense will argue against the government. It will also be the first opportunity for the public to see how the government aims to ensure Manning is convicted.
What will be most interesting is how the judge handles the issue of the public not being allowed into the hearing if classified information is being discussed. If the struggles the ACLU and Guantanamo attorneys have experienced provide any indication, the information he is accused of releasing would be treated as still classified even though it is now available to the public. The judge would likely close the hearing to the public when “Collateral Murder,” the war logs, the US State Embassy cables, Gitmo Files, etc, are being discussed. That discussion should make up a good portion of the hearing since his crime, in the eyes of the US government, is “leaking” this information. So, the public may not be able to hear much of the government’s prosecution and at least part of the argument for Manning’s defense.
What the public might be privy to hearing is discussion on how Manning has been treated thus far. But, how much that will factor into the case depends on how much Coombs wants to cite that when defending Manning. If the defense centers on Manning being a whistleblower, again, there probably isn’t much of the hearing the judge will let the public view.
For more on Bradley Manning’s detention, here is Firedoglake’s complete coverage.



22 Comments

ZOOM!
Thanks again, Kevin!
I would think that the attorney would press some issues as the right to know and consent of the governed, etc. The wars in both countries had gone on too long for the government to sneak around with lies to citizens and the world.
December 16 Pre-Trial Hearing for Bradley Manning: An idea whose time has finally come.
I suppose we can expect, on top of the brutal repression of the occupy movement, an escalation of our government shedding its veils of democracy.
Repost from below with an addition:
When Dan and Jane, Bill, and others were arrested at the Tar Sands protests I was especially proud of them for their clothing. This time, I said, they can’t get Dan for protesting in his uniform. However, the uniform that they wore is the uniform of the power elite. They both had on suits. That is the same case for Manning. He was on duty in his uniform, yet did his duty to protect America from all enemies, those within as well.
Could a little wardrobe change make the difference in media reports regarding hippies? Most of the protesters are either in college, graduates, and highly skilled human beings. Could some power suits make a difference? If so, I think we all have some to add to the cause. Not many of us are working anymore and have no hope of finding jobs that pay living wages
According to Coombs:
In Maryland. Nice. So…the courthouse will be #occupied for the hearing, right? Or is it impossible since it will be at Fort Meade?
Speaking of all things Wikileaks, sort of.
Has that jerk hacker that talked to Manning on those internet threads been sequestered to appear? How can we find out? Also, didn’t he have some involvement with the FBI while talking to Manning? All parties should be placed on the stand.
EMPRISON the Baracketeer, instead!
Where will they find a judge with a superduper secret clearance to be briefed on classified information?
It is a Military Tribunal. They got their own.
Protecting America from fascist bastards…………
Ah! I remember the name now. It’s Lamo. I call bull on any pre-trial hearing that does not include questions of Lamo!
Since the NSA protects its Fort Meade “campus” via dog search and appointment rules for parking and access – I wonder how the “public” will get access to the hearing.
Perhaps there is an “open to the public” access point for Fort Meade?
17 months in pre-trial confinement under conditions that the entire global human rights community clearly label as torture is a stain on the fabric of the united states that can never be removed… and to what purpose…? there can be only one answer to that question and that is it is a clear demonstration to you and me about the dangers of whistleblowing and the consequences we could experience if we engage in holding up the mirror to our government… it is in the same category as the demonization of wikileaks, indefinite detention at guantanamo and the pepper-spraying of peaceful protestors at uc davis… my country is disintegrating before my very eyes…
And, yes, I DO take it personally
My attempt at sniderly was who can the CID, DIA, FBI, NSA, Administration or CIA find trustworthy enough, outside their cabal, to view top secret or State secret documents. And especially whether said documents deserve that level of secrecy.
How you dress makes an enormous difference to how others “code” you. And that make a difference to how they treat you. Chicago National Lawyers’ Guild attorney Jerry Boyle, in a business suit and tie, noted in a great video on how to disarm a police officer that the cops take orders from guys dressed like him.
If anyone can come up with the link, it would be great.
Gah. I was afraid of that. It’s inconvenient enough to get on an average military base with photo id, registration, insurance, etc., but there will surely be a concerted effort to bar regular peeps from showing up.
Just because “coding” is universally done does not make it right. I say that we should emphasize the value of diversity rather than try to pass.
Apparently there’s going to be a march and rally where Manning is being tried. Will there be other events around the country?
Has that jerk
hackerclergyman that talked to Manning on those internet threads been sequestered to appear?Rules of Military Evidence 503:
A person has a privilege to refuse to disclose and to prevent another from disclosing a confidential communication by the person to a clergyman or a clergyman’s assistant, if such communication is made either as a formal act of religion or as a matter of conscience…
A “clergyman” is a minister, priest, rabbi, chaplain, or other similar functionary of a religious organization, or an individual reasonably believed to be so by the person consulting the clergyman…
—-from chat log as published by Wired:
info@adrianlamo.com: I’m a journalist and a minister. You can pick either, and treat this as a confession or an interview (never to be published) & enjoy a modicum of legal protection.
—-
(12:50:20 PM) bradass87: i cant believe what im confessing to you :’(
(1:40:20 PM) bradass87: ive been so isolated so long… i just wanted to be nice, and live a normal life… but events kept forcing me to figure out ways to survive… smart enough to know whats going on, but helpless to do anything… no-one took any notice of me…
(1:54:55 PM) bradass87: but im not a source for you… im talking to you as someone who needs moral and emotional fucking support
(1:55:02 PM) bradass87: :’(
(1:55:10 PM) info@adrianlamo.com: i told you, none of this is for print
(1:55:16 PM) bradass87: ok, ok
(1:55:19 PM) info@adrianlamo.com: i want to know who i’m supporting…
—-
(7:33:33 AM) info@adrianlamo.com: i’m writing a message trying to tie meetings together globally with a sampling of only ~3000 people to work with and get to go out and evangelize, so i have it on the brain…
—–
10:12:57 AM) info@adrianlamo.com: are you baptist by any chance?
(10:13:34 AM) bradass87: raised catholic… never believed a word of it
http://my.firedoglake.com/kgosztola/2011/07/13/wired-magazine-finally-releases-entire-manning-lamo-chat-logs-whats-revealed/
Would love to see what evidence is presented. Will there be transcripts for public consumption? Word has it that almost anyone could of accessed the computers and passwords were taped to the backs of the computers. Fair trial, Highly unlikely.
Friggin traitor. Hope he’s found guilty as charged.
Yes, a lot of us hope Lamo does hard time.