Van Jones, head of “Rebuild the Dream” campaign (photo: TalkMediaNews)
Occupiers from occupations all over the United States are headed to Washington, DC, for three days of action that are being organized under the banner, “Take Back the Capitol.” They are driving from Boston, Chicago, Kansas City, Minneapolis, Pittsburgh and other cities to the nation’s capital. There they will set up a temporary camp on the National Mall that will be there for four days.
These occupiers are likely bold people, the same bold people the world has been watching sleep out in rainy, windy and cold weather. These are the same Americans who have been standing their ground in the face of police intimidation, harassment and even violence. They are the very citizens who have kept momentum up and creatively sought to launch new campaigns, like “Occupy Our Homes,” to revitalize the energy of the movement, even though mayors, especially Democratic mayors, are ordering crackdowns on encampments all over the country.
They will arrive in DC to protest bank bailouts and exorbitant bonuses on Wall Street. They will protest foreclosures and corporate influence on the court system. They may demand criminals on Wall Street be investigated, prosecuted and sent to jail. And they may raise issues related to police brutality and the loss of civil liberties in this country too, as the Occupy movement has experienced this firsthand over the past months.
But, the occupiers won’t be the only people there. Occupy didn’t come up with the idea for this week of action. The Midwest Democracy Project reports, “Rebuild the Dream, the Center for Community Change, USAction, Interfaith Worker Justice, Faith in Life, MoveOn.org, the Service Employees International Union and the AFL-CIO,” are sponsoring the action. The Project adds:
Piggybacking on the Occupy Wall Street movement, the three-day “Take Back the Capitol” protest will open Monday with construction of a “Peoples Camp” on the National Mall as a base of operations. On Tuesday, protesters will hit Capitol Hill to lobby members of Congress about extending federal unemployment benefits. The group walks to K Street on Wednesday to protest the political influence of corporate lobbyists.
And on Thursday, they’ll host a national prayer vigil for the unemployed on Capitol Hill. At the same time, the AFL-CIO will coordinate simultaneous protests at congressional district offices across the country to call for extending unemployment benefits that are slated to expire Dec. 31 without congressional action.
The organizations sponsoring are a veritable who’s who of the liberal establishment. These organizations have been trying to take advantage of the energy the Occupy movement has been creating for change since Day 1 because they have been miserable when it comes to holding all politicians, including Democrats, accountable for their decisions and inaction on various policies and issues. Especially with President Barack Obama in office, they have been weak when it comes to challenging corporate power and Wall Street’s control over Washington, which the Obama Administration and Democrats have in concert with Republicans enabled.
This week of action will seek to focus all the energy of Occupy into one goal: saving unemployment benefits from being killed by Republicans.
In the scheme of things, this is very timid. These groups are going to bring people together for four days on the National Mall and all they are going to demand is that Congress do something that Democratic leaders like Harry Reid and Nancy Pelosi are already more than willing to defend saving? They are going to “remind Congress to represent all Americans not just the richest 1%” as if the issue here is that they forgot we the people elect them and corporations, special interests and the wealthy do not? Congress knows who votes for them but its members know the money from corporations and special interests is more important. Plus, many of them do not really care what the majority of Americans want done in this country. They have their own ideology, whether it be libertarian, culturally and socially right wing, centrist, neoliberal or liberal-leaning, and they are sticking to it.
The organizations are well aware they could possibly be seen as undermining the Occupy movement. If you go to the websites of these liberal establishment groups, as of 8:00 AM ET on December 5, there is no mention of this week-long event to “take back the Capitol.” That is because they setup their own website. 99 in DC, for the event that does not list the groups that are supporting. Instead, what they tell people interested in who is behind this effort is the following:
“Take Back the Capitol” is being organized by a wide variety of community, labor, Occupy, and other groups around the country.
Why decide to not list the names of the organizations behind this effort? What are these organizations afraid people will think? Or do they know that a significant number of people are leery of any attempt to get involved in Occupy? Are they aware that people know these liberal organizations are only capable of flop attempts at change, like the “One Nation Working Together” rally in October of last year?
The AFL-CIO, American Federation for Teachers, NAACP, SEIU and the Sierra Club, came together and organized that October event. An individual wearing a United Auto Workers Union T-shirt told me he was glad people came out and there was good camaraderie but he was disappointed because they didn’t march. I noted then the organizers had used the word “march,” that they were going to march for jobs, education, immigrant rights, justice and more, but all they did was hold a 4-hour rally at the Lincoln Memorial.
I concluded what they meant by “march” was they were going to “march” on the polls on November 2 to overwhelm the efforts of the Tea Party to take control of Congress. The Tea Party still won. Additionally, the rally had an indirect benefit to the politicians and corporations that most opposed the agenda being promoted at the rally. The organizers managed the anger and frustration of people and ensured the rally only discussed issues that were not taboo to the power elite (like war). Organizers made certain the event did not involve any kind of an independent movement that would promote major acts of civil disobedience, direct action or electoral activism outside of the two dominant parties in America. The likelihood that the rally would have any sort of influence on politics was minimized by organizers themselves.
Consider the following: the AP reported in November “the jobs crisis has left so many people out of work for so long that most of America’s unemployed are no longer receiving unemployment benefits.”
Early last year, 75 percent were receiving checks. The figure is now 48 percent — a shift that points to a growing crisis of long-term unemployment. Nearly one-third of America’s 14 million unemployed have had no job for a year or more.
What do these liberal organizations plan to say on behalf of these people during the week? How will they speak up for them? These are really the kind of people that have been living at encampments. They are people who have no place to go, who plead with occupiers at General Assembly meetings to be careful what they do because if the police crack down they will be sleeping in a doorway somewhere.
Also, two years ago, Congressman Dennis Kucinich pointed out the extension of unemployment benefits was being tied to a war spending bill. What if Senator Reid or Rep. Pelosi decide to do that again? The Center for Economic and Policy Research has found “the sharp increase in war spending is taking up a greater portion of our Gross Domestic Product” and “will cost the US about two million jobs because such spending ‘is a direct drain on the economy, reducing efficiency, slowing growth and costing jobs.’ Contrary to popular assumptions, massive spending for war does not create jobs. It costs jobs. War spending is capital-intensive, not labor-intensive. War creates unemployment.”
The Occupy movement has expanded the possibilities for change. They have not played by the rules. They are not afraid to make political enemies in Congress or the Obama Administration because they know those in the halls of power already want to keep a measured distance from the movement. They understand the country does not just need to focus on addressing economic agenda items but also on democratizing the system of government rigged to favor corporations and the 1%. And now these liberal organizations want to go to the National Mall, use Occupy tactics and call for the same weak goals they have been calling for throughout the past few years?
Liberal groups are stuck in this mode of playing defense against Republicans. The Occupy movement is an offensive response to Republicans, Democrats and the failure of the whole entire system. Occupy isn’t about saving what might be lost tomorrow. So much has been lost to neoliberalism and Reaganism. It is about what can be gained tomorrow if people take a step out of their comfort zones.
One should not worry that the Occupy movement will be co-opted. They aren’t going to take back the Occupy movement anymore than the people are going to take back Capitol Hill this week. This action has been planned because these organizations have to do this or admit they have become irrelevant. In fact, there is little these organizations can do to contain the current energy and spirit of the Occupy movement, which is advocating for many policy goals these organizations would never have the guts to try and sell with some slick campaign. They have been, as Naomi Klein might say, NGO-ized to the point of sheer impotency.
Occupiers should participate but they should not be willing to be so timid. If this is going to be just about unemployment benefits, because liberal organizations are hedging their bets that Democrats can win this battle against Republicans, make it about that and expanding the social safety net. If this is going to be about the influence of corporate lobbyists, go one step further and make it about the corporate cronies in the Obama Administration and other agencies of government working against the 99%. And, if they get cold feet and back away from a plan to camp on the National Mall, because park police say “no,” show them how it is supposed to be done and occupy.



79 Comments

Kevin,
The song dedication to Occupy K-Street has gone out to them.
Today is Occupy Waterfront Day. They will be at the Ports.
It.Ain’t.Gonna.Work
There is too much history of liberal politicians oppressing the Occupy movement for any of those organizations to co-opt it. If those organizations want a coalition for a specific action, that obviously is a different matter.
Also, the folks going and not holding down their local encampments or general assembly activities are likely those aligned with the sponsors anyway. If large enough, it could spill into an national encampment on the mall that cannot easily be removed. The practical issues of an encampment have be field-tested at hundreds of occupations. Folks know what the issues are, and some locations have found ways to deal with different issues effectively.
That doesn’t mean that it will go that way. I’m expecting a tightly scripted event in rally format like the events held at Foley Square with Occupy Wall Street NYC.
Fifty bucks says the police won’t have much of a problem with this demonstration, which is very much in line with the message of Obama 2012.
Just a coincidence, I’m sure.
Sounds like some of the organizers from these groups have been trying to coerce Occupy DC participants into supporting their effort. I’m looking forward to seeing how genuine occupiers—people who have been sleeping in camps—handle all this.
Divide and conquer.
Always effective.
Assholes.
I don’t trust self-styled ‘liberals’ especially Obamaites because the neoliberalism that has taken over the Democratic party, for example, is nothing but smiley face fascism. But on the other hand the issues these groups say they represent are good ones and for change to succeed it must have widespread support, so OK, I’m with it for now, we shall see what it turns into.
If anyone takes that bet let me know, I’ve got some beach front property in Kansas I need to let go…
And that is why in last paragraph I suggest pushing them. Push liberal groups to be more bold. When they are weak and timid, occupiers can point out their spinelessness or weakness and continue doing what they have been doing.
Fixed it for ya.
Fuck Van Jones, MoveOn.org, SEIU, AFL-CIO and the rest of these neoliberal motherfuckers.
Anyone that says they’re a “liberal” is part of the problem. Liberalism has morphed into neoliberalism and neoliberalism serves the interests of the 1%. Perhaps Occupy DC will allow for the unmasking of this fraud in the service of a corporate administration.
Amen.
If any unions wanted to lead this thing, it should be the wobblies. They’ve NEVER lacked spine, as far as I can tell.
EDITED
And yet this could backfire on them.
There is a lot of energy in the Occupy movement that won’t be easily herded into a veal pen.
This is timid stuff. Playing defense.
How about the goal of tax rates for the wealthy comparable to the Eisenhower years – just for starters.
As for unemployment benefits… instead of pushing for the bare necessity push for an increase in benefits – and training.
Where did these morons learn to negotiate?
Never bet against Jane.
I’m with Jane. Nothing will happen. Hoover shut down a large encampment on the Mall, and things didn’t turn out so well for him.
A good way for Occupiers to test this: Start chaining themselves to the White House fence while holding “WANNA FIX THE DEFICIT? LET THE BUSH TAX CUTS EXPIRE” and “WALL STREET BANKSTERS THREW US OUT INTO THE STREET: WHY DON’T YOU ARREST THEM INSTEAD OF US?”
FDL should seriously consider starting the response to Grover Norquist’s stupid Pledge by asking every candidate running for office at the state and federal level to pledge to their constituents in writing that they will let the Bush tax cuts expire at the end of next year.
It’s simple. It makes the point that the Bush tax cuts are a failed experiment. And, once enough Democrats sign it, FDL can hold the others’ feet to the fire for not making the pledge.
It would get a lot of publicity.
I love this.
It always drove me crazy that getting agreement on the left was like herding cats. Little did I realize that this is more a strength than a weakness.
While the tired old usual suspects of the liberal establishment try to take on the role of catherd, the real hunters of OWS are hot on the trail of the rats infesting the halls of power. It’s a great time to be alive.
Correction to PW and Knox. Because he didn’t veto the bill, they’re the OBYSMAL tax cuts now.
Yup. The ones that are too far gone to rebel against the Veal Pen’s limits (much less actually be effective advocates for the groups they claim to represent) versus the ones that still can make a difference.
The Occupiers should keep doing what they’ve been doing and see who still courts them. The ones who flee the fastest from the Occupiers are the ones who weren’t their friends anyway.
Heh heh heh. I like the cut of your jib.
Will o, in comfortable shoes, stand with them ?
He’s on right the TV machine now saying how important to gut SS to save it.
They did expire and were taken up by o , he owns that stupid policy. Genius my ass.
The Democratic party must be getting very nervous about the Occupy movement.. Maybe the problem is how many peoples HOPE has Changed..
An attempt to co-opt the occupy mission is part of the goal, not that the issues these folks will bring up are not real. Institutional groups are always afraid of the non conventional. It is an accurate depiction of what I sense in my locale. Let’s hope the stuff they throw will not stick and the Occupy spirit is not broken.
Obama sucks.
My point is that there needs to be a real response to Grover Norquist and his stupid pledge. What I’m suggesting is something that FDL is very good at doing.
It would be a way to get lawmakers and candidates in 2012 on the record and to put a spotlight on the issue.
And it puts Obama and incumbent Democrats on the spot for having extended the Bush tax cuts for two more years.
There’s nothing that says we can’t judo them and Occupy them right back. Hell, as Kevin says, this is where we find out who’s useful and who’s not (and also, if they’re useful, in what ways they’re useful).
A-yep.
Hey, if the Veal Penners are suddenly taking the Occupiers to their bosoms after years of increasing hostility to other folks espousing what the Occupiers espouse, test them by simply doing exactly what Occupy has always been doing and see if they still want to get lovey-dovey.
Until it goes off script.
To a group that has already demonstrated its impotence? I doubt it.
Don’t rule out the possibility that Occupy co-opts the quasi-liberals.
You don’t herd the cats. You herd the rats that lead the cats. And only silly old pied pipers can do that.
Christmastime sounds like a good time for a party in DC, and a lesson of some sort for us and for the world. I don’t know what that will be, but we’ll find out.
Let’s just see where this goes. Worry about feeding the homeless and hungry; DC seems to providing all the entertainment and sorrow we need this time of year.
Outstanding idea!!!
You had me at “Obama sucks”.
Only problem is, the congresscreeps won’t sign.
x2
I agree completely with you but hate to hear anyone claim they are bushes tax cuts.
The Norquist pledge is No Taxes.
What would be the response? I Pledge to Raise Taxes doesn’t sound like a winner.
True, but I’m thinking your analysis above is correct, that is that the occupy folks that do arrive in DC a sympathetic to these organizations anyway. And if that’s the case, I’m thinking they won’t go off script.
He said the pledge above: I pledge to let the Bush Tax cuts expire at the end of 2012.
A-yep. And while the union leadership at the national levels is often/usually pretty weak, the locals are often quite amenable to working with (and not trying to subvert) the local Occupy branches. Much depends on how many competent folks are in either outfit.
Ouch. Well I’m a liberal and the furthest thing away from supporting neoliberal/conservative agendas.
I don’t think we should get too caught up in the labels, liberals, progressives, etc. Just observe deeds and behavior. We have many so-called liberal/progressive groups and dem politicians who’s deeds are as rightwing as any republican.
On topic, fuck BO, most all dems, and their tools. I heard Maxine Waters a few weeks back say she appreciated the OWS movement. She said the politicians know what to do. They just refuse to do it. OWS puts pressure on them. This contrasts with the standard bullshit dem like congressman Bob Filner from San Diego. He said he had no idea what ows wanted. He didn’t see any demands. This guy is a completely out of touch dem who like many of his ilk ought to be dumped!
At this point Occupy holds the initiative 100%. This is a rear guard action by the Democratic interest groups to prevent being completely submerged.
I should’ve added that while I think it’s a GREAT idea, and I do mean GREAT IDEA, that most Democrats wouldn’t sign it anyway. Obama, and most Congressional Democrats, are on record as not letting a majority of the Bush tax cuts expire. The only portion they want to expire is the top rate, so they can claim the middle class didn’t get a tax raise.
It’s bullshit though because even then most of the benefit of the tax cuts goes to the rich, not the middle class.
If Occupy DC is smart, they’ll use the Obysmal quislings to keep themselves from getting evicted from their occupation.
How about a pledge return to the sound tax policies of the Republican Eisenhower Era ?
But then Occupy DC is coordinating actions with them. Like some one said, it should be interesting. If only for the dance between Occupy DC and Occupy the Capitol.
Going to legislative offices to politely beg for a bit more unemployment benefit, please?
Necessary for the short term but not sufficient. And how much energy should we expend on this task?
We need to demand that corporations stop destroying jobs.
How do we do that? By making it difficult for those corporations that institute layoffs, outsource jobs, and buy cheap goods made in other countries, to make a profit.
Ideas on tactics, anyone?
Pissing contest?
Agree, it is time for OWS to have an impact on primary elections, no candidates who don’t reject Citizens United, don’t take corp money, Candidates from the movement running as Americans taking back the Democratic Party or starting a new one.
National No Buy Days.
It things get out of hand in DC, everyone can blame it Bloomberg. He told everyone to leave New York and go to Washington.
Yeah, get as many people as possible to pledge NOT TO SPEND a penny during the holiday season. You get 3, maybe 5 million or more folks pledge that (and follow through), you’d get their attention in a hurry.
Of course it won’t work though because most folks would never sign that pledge, and of those that did, most of them wouldn’t follow through.
But you hit them hard on their holiday sales (for some, half of their annual sales occur during the holidays) then you’ve got their attention but good. They might be pissed, but you’d get their attention.
I think I might owe you a drink. I type too slow. LOL.
What’ll you have?
Of course, if the pied piper actually had the power to get rid of the rats in the first place it would have happened already.
Turns out that pied piper isn’t only silly and old, he’s a fraud – charging the village for services that he’s unable to perform.
And have I tortured this metaphor enough?
Will never happen. Too many people have been brainwashed by the endless reruns of Dickens’ Christmas Carol.
It’s a great idea but how do we get to the people we watched in all those insane vids from Black Friday? Those are the people we really need to get to.
I believe in the mental health profession, the chronically insane are considered beyond remediation. Same principle applies here.
Beer. Any.
It doesn’t have to be during the Holidays. The leason we needed learn is that money is the hammer. Collectively it is still our hammer. We just don’t use it.
Thanks Kevin for the info
Very early in the movement when concerns about future co-option attempts first surfaced, I posted my favorite quote from the movie “Watchmen”:
“I’m not locked in here with all of you; all of you are locked in here WITH ME.”
-Rorschach
It is all a matter of perspective.
To be clearer, I agree, OWS go on the offensive and try to co-opt the would-be co-opters.
Please Please Please do not fault the new liberal groups who have just recently found a back bone. Instead think of them as “DILETTANTES.”
In the words of other revolutionaries, they are useful idiots.
Or better yet, they have seen the light.
I want all of these liberal groups to participate in OWS, BUT to work within the general assembly system. If their ideas have merit, let the OWS GA endorse the idea.
This is not about sour grapes but about possibility. LET OWS co-opt their movement!!!
I said insane videos, not insane people. I worked in mental health for 20 years and thought disorders can be treated and personality disorders can be resolved.
Oh, I wasn’t referring to just the holidays. We’ve got to break out of mindless consumerism.
Good advice, IMO.
Yeah, oldnslow, money is our hammer. Or, one of them. Used collectively.
We have to stop feeding the beast. A lot of us.
We can stop buying. We can do work-arounds, by buying from small businesses. We can explore forming cooperatives.
Many of us have already moved our money from big banks to credit unions and small local banks.
We have to start thinking about this and coming up with creative ideas.
Doh, sorry, I was otherwise detained.
May be late but here’s three so you can choose one. Or, you know, drink all the three (that sounds like the best plan to me).
You’re right, but boy the holidays would be a great place to start. For many, many corps the holiday sales make or break them for the whole year.
Why not challenge these oh so Liberal groups to feed and clothe the homeless in DC for four months not waste energy lobbying for four days.
The Washington “liberals” are as much the problem as Washington “conservatives.” They are all the servants of the 1%, and anything the so-called “liberals” do will be an attempt to co-opt and destroy OWS.
The City of London Police force was facing criticism last night after including the Occupy London demonstration in a letter warning businesses about potential terrorist threats.
The letter, a “Terrorism/Extremism Update”, lists al-Qa’ida, the Colombian dissidents Farc, and Belarusian terrorists who bombed the Minsk underground. It also lists Occupy London under the heading “Domestic”.
It states: “It is likely that activists aspire to identify other locations to occupy, especially those they identify with capitalism. City of London Police has received a number of hostile reconnaissance reports concerning individuals who would fit the anti-capitalist profile. All are asked to be vigilant regarding suspected reconnaissance, particularly around empty buildings.”
Your suggestion poses an interesting test of the hypothesis that groups like the American Dream have been immunized from the thuggery of the police state due to their covert support by the Obama Administartion. Hopefully there will be people there to observe behind the scenes activities to further elaborate this obvious but unproven relationship and to bring out some of the specific threats that exist for co-opting the movement.
They won’t if we don’t ask.
Maybe Occupy should target the offices of the Veal Pen groups, put those orgs in the limelight, increase the pressure on them to peel away from Zero and the Dem party?
See here.
In addition to this excellent post, there is this truthout piece:
Why the “Left” Establishment Can’t Create Demands for the Occupy Movement
Wouldn’t ya know that the stench of DailyKos is all over the effort to “co-opt” (aka destroy) the OWS movement?
A perfect example of how insidous the liberal agenda has become is their effort to privatize our public education system – something that they call “education reform.” It’s all nicely packaged for the typical low-info liberal as “bridging the achievement gap,” or “increased funds for education” etc, and is touted by liberal icons such as Oprah, Obama and Steve Jobs.
Of course, it’s really about putting public money into private pockets and dismantling democratic institutions.
Money is not our hammer; it is our shackle and chain.
More to the point, if we continue to hold property sacred, the rich with their sacred property will endure forever.
In corrupting the government, impoverishing the people, creating an army to oppress the people, holding themselves above the law, and eroding our fundamental rights, the 1% has broken the social contract. And in breaking the social contract, they have forfeited their own rights. Their misbegotten property must be reclaimed by the people, for the people. It is not appropriate that we should negotiate and beg favor with those who we must depose.
This is the true message of physical occupation.
OWS… cannot participate in this sham.
The only purpose of this scam is to co-opt the movement and discredit the movement.
Republicans will now claim OWS to be ringers for the Corrupt Democrats. Independents like me will have lost faith in their ability to be truly independent of the political establishment and to hold ALL politicians of both partys accountabe for the total corruption of our government.
They need to cancel this scam and hold their own gathering… seperate from the Corrupt Democratic party sham gathering.
Something is VERY wrong here. This is a setup… for betrayal.
In fact I will go one further…
If OWS participates in this… they are done.