
Occupy Buffalo Night Owls
Ever since Martin Luther King Jr. Day, I have been on another tour of Occupy protest sites in the country. Right now I am at Occupy Buffalo. I spent the night here last night and for the first time I actually occupied and slept in a tent. The experience gave me the opportunity to really understand what it is like for occupiers to operate an encampment in the cold winter.
Sam, who has been an Occupy Supply liaison, met me at the bus station. She brought me down to the occupation in Niagara Square. She immediately began to show great hospitality and appreciation for the contribution Occupy Supply has made to Occupy Buffalo. She and another occupier, who I believe is named Jamie, also began to sternly explain how the encampment has a zero tolerance for drugs, alcohol and homeless people, who are in the camp and unwilling to protest.
The occupation set me up with a newer tent. I joked but immediately was aware that this is the type of development in a camp that can start conflict. Some occupier could say, “Why does he get the new tent? He isn’t even an occupier.” But immediately when Sam began to introduce me and I began to say, “Hello!” to people, it became clear occupiers here had a lot of respect for what Firedoglake has done for them through Occupy Supply.
I asked for some Occupy Supply gear that I could use while I was in the camp, because I did not have gear to stay outside and sleep in an encampment. Someone quickly pointed out how odd it was that the guy who is technically with Occupy Supply didn’t have his own gear.
Sam showed me around the protest site and took me inside the comfort tent, where they keep the clothing and supplies for sleeping. She told me that the clothing could be removed and donated to a Salvation Army. They might not have it here anymore because people become too reliant on clothing from the camp and this camp isn’t a shelter. It is a 24/7 base for protest.
I was taken inside a tepee that the occupiers have on site. It is for meditation and anyone who wants to use it for prayer, etc.
The occupation also has a geodesic dome that was donated. Occupiers were watching movies that were being projected on to the inside of the dome.
For most of the evening, I was in the food tent. I listened as occupiers talked to me about some of the conflicts they have had in the camp (of which I will detail more later). I did two interviews. Each person was very interested in how Occupy Supply was started. I explained that we set it up to give all Americans a very real way to help the Occupy movement if they could not get down to an encampment to protest.
I stayed up until just after midnight. I witnessed two situations where occupiers had to put their foot down and tell people they could not be here. One involved a woman who had drawn blood on the site when she beat up her boyfriend. She tried to come get food and was asked directly to leave. The other incident involved a tall middle-aged gentleman with ponytail who came in quietly to get some food. He didn’t look like someone who had been organizing with the movement. He was asked to leave and not come back. But, he had no place to stay. The man returned and managed to convince a few occupiers to give him a sleeping bag.
When the morning came, Sam found him sleeping in the camp. He was not someone who had been protesting with Occupy Buffalo, though he claimed to be part of the “struggle.” He tried to steal a sleeping bag that is specially made for subzero temperatures. An occupier that is also homeless but has become an active participant in Buffalo, someone who is a pretty good-sized individual, confronted this man, who was told to get out of the camp. And they were able to get the sleeping bag from him before he could take off with it.
I slept pretty well overnight. Occupy Buffalo had a heater for my tent. I had two blankets along with a sleeping bag. So, for people who believe everyone here would have to be freezing, that is not the case, especially since occupiers here have Occupy Supply gear.
If there is anything I take away from being here overnight, it is that you really come to understand how you are responsible for yourself and others and must be vigilant and keep an eye out for anyone who might come into the camp and stir up trouble. Each occupier has to be diligent and mature. They have to potentially look someone in the eye and tell them they cannot be here and be willing to stay on them until they do leave the camp.
This is a place for challenging poverty and building a movement that will challenge the political and social forces that lead people to become impoverished. There is only so much an Occupy site can do for the bottom 1%, who come here but do not want to protest.
When you are in a tent, you can feel a sense of pride because you are part of the vanguard of a movement that truly has the potential to impact society and perhaps win systemic changes that are necessary to the future of all people (e.g. abolishing corporate personhood or getting money out of politics). You can also hear cars whizzing by in the night, the wind and everything in the city space around you that makes noise. You can wonder if you will still be here tomorrow too. Will something happen to your tent while you are sleeping in the night?
Today, winds are expected to gust up to 40 mph. There was rain this morning. It could get colder and snow. But don’t talk about the weather with Occupy Buffalo. The weather is probably their last concern. They are here to challenge corporate greed, corporate personhood, the influence of money in politics, foreclosures and improper home evictions, those on Wall Street that deserve to be investigated, prosecuted and sent to jail for their role in the 2008 economic collapse, etc. They are here to make it through winter to spring and collectively have the confidence and demeanor to achieve this goal.



46 Comments







Kevin,
I wish I could pat you on the back. So glad you were able to stay warm while sleeping. FDL’s Occupy Supply IS a huge success and means a great deal to all of us that support their efforts.
I think about the cold and damp especially how it affects female occupyers. Their bodies can’t deal with continuous damp, frigid conditions. They have my ultimate respect for bracing the weather for this cause and change in what matters in this world. Thank you for participating in the shoes they wear daily. Thank you more for bringing us the view from the inside!
Saving the Farm!
Thanks so much for boing there Kevin. Occupy Buffalo has had a lot of provocateurs trying to take them down, and I suspect it’s because they’ve been so successful at dealing with many of the internal issues that have weakened other encampments. I think they have a lot to teach everyone, and I know I’ve certainly learned a tremendous amount talking with them.
Bob and John of Occupy Buffalo stayed with me in DC when they came for Occupy Congress. Bob’s picture is on the latest “state of the occupation” post:
http://fdlaction.firedoglake.com/2012/01/23/occupysupply-state-of-the-occupation-1232012/
I’ll be interested to hear your theory about why these occupations you are visiting right now have been so strong. The people I’ve met from OB seem very smart and committed, and I imagine that plays a big part.
OT– “Package delivery” if you haven’t seen this already and another piece of the puzzle as to why Occupy might be unpopular with the 1%ers.
OMG!!!!
Eye Bulger!
Thanks for the important information. We gotta also keep our eyes on that.
Peter Sutherland appears to be another Karl Rove type. Don’t know how to stop them, but somethings gotta be done.
Occupy the Frackers:
http://www.tomdispatch.com/
“US Homeland Security Suggests Military Action in Nigeria. DHS Targets Nigerian Islamist Group Boko Haram” (GlobalResearch.CA, by Nile Bowie, Jan. 19, 2012)
Peter T. King, Movie Mogul (empywheel, Jan. 6, 2012) and Committee on Homeland Security report:
“Subcommittee Hearing: Boko Haram – Emerging Threat to the U.S. Homeland” by Subcommittee on Counterterrorism and Intelligence | 311 Cannon House Office Building Washington, DC 20515 | Nov 30, 2011 10:00am
Great factual report, Kevin. It appears that OB is taking a stricter approach in dealing with the homeless than other occupations. It is a challenge dealing with that issue, and OB seems to have found a solution that works for them.
Fortunately for the occupiers at Buffalo, they don’t seem to be the facing the restrictions on the use of heating and electricity that other encampments are forced to live with, making winter survival even more challenging.
Thanks, Kevin!
It seems as if Occupy Buffalo and Occupy Flint are among the two current biggest Occupy success stories, along with Occupy Des Moines.
What could possibly go wrong? (2009)
MIC confab happened at a Melbourne University, RMIT, today (Aviation Business, Jan. 17, 2012). Aussies have to stop a police state and closing country. Gillibrand is involved in it and she is above her eye balls.
Thanks Kevin your devotion and effort to this movement is outstanding. I wish I could be along side you. Keep up the great work you are an inspiration.
Thanks Kevin for this report. The official portrait with the Occupy Supply watch cap is snazzy.
This is for Kevin, Jane and the others with an overview of the Occupy movement and its problems.
I have been trying to look in on the websites and discussion forums on several occupy sites looking particularly to see the kinds of conflicts that come up and how they are dealt with. When a group gets together for any purpose, there are processes they grow through to enter a first “pseudo-community” stage when everybody is seeming to get along. But, like a marriage, after they are together for a while they begin to get on each others nerves and conflicts and power struggles develop. Apparently many Occupy groups break up at that point or at least split. But there are ways to get through that and come out the other side. (see Scott Peck, “A Different Drummer”)
I am wondering if anyone is consciously working on some kind of program or advice or consulting to help the individual groups get through these stages, especially with the participatory democracy consensus model which drives some people absolutely crazy and appeals to others. Also the issue of the homeless and street people relative to the group. (I am reading a blog, “A Homeless Blogger in NYC: ahomelessbloggerinnyc.blogspot.com and getting the other perspective on that issue.) There are people out there who have been activists in organizations a long time, and the newcomers should not be left to re-invent the wheel any more than necessary.
I interviewed John and will put up his interview (and some other occupiers’ interviews) later after I give the coverage Occupy Detroit, Occupy Cleveland and Occupy Pittsburgh are due.
Or at least somebody could collect the most helpful rules and methods you find in the stronger groups as you travel around, such as what you told about the Buffalo groups and the homeless men and women above.
And here is a view from a professor that I had in college. I don’t necessarily agree but let me put forth this view just because it has currency among occupations and its currency does have practical implications:
‘Scuse me!!!!
The perspective of your professor points towards a faultline with serious implications. Last November, someone was killed in the late afternoon near the Occupy Oakland encampment. Shortly afterwards, I had the opportunity to interview Shake Anderson, a media person for Occupy Oakland, and asked him about it. I expected him to reinforce the line that the crime had nothing to do with Occupy Oakland, as acknowledged by the Oakland police department.
Instead, Anderson said something quite different, and more profound. He said that it was unrealistic to expect Occupy Oakland to exist independent of the substance abuse and violence common in much of Oakland, and that the crime was a reflection of the failure of the existing political system in the city to find solutions that would reduce them. I was really impressed by that, he wasn’t going to go along with the separation of people into categories like occupier/homeless/gang member/substance abuser, separations that diminish the potential reach of the movement.
In both Oakland and Sacramento, the homeless have been a prominent feature of these occupations, perhaps less so now after the police repression. Personally, I don’t think that the homeless should be excluded from occupations because of their unwillingness to protest, because it takes a great deal of courage for them to associate themselves with Occupy given the ever present peril of police violence. This is one of the major reasons why people of color, especially the undocumented, have been careful about their association with Occupy activities. Certainly, people must conform to rules of conduct and norms of mutual respect, but wouldn’t it be better if occupations sought to engage the homeless and encourage them to participate in collective actions instead of imposing it as a condition of entry?
After all, for the movement to succeed, don’t they, and the other most egregious victims of this social order, need to find the motivation to assert themselves politically? Whether the ‘wretched’ are more important than the ‘proletariat’ strikes me as an unnecessary theoretical exercise, but, surely, there must be a place for them, a place that emerges as much from their own initiative as it does from standards of behaviour imposed by better educated, privileged people? The notion that homeless people can’t stay at Occupy Buffalo unless they are willing to immediately participate in protests reminds me of what my late mother told me about why she couldn’t stand the Salvation Army, you had to sit through the sermon, whether you wanted to or not, before you got the meal. Of course, Occupy isn’t a social welfare organization like the Salvation Army, but the question of the provision of social assistance and political action is, I think, more challenging than the imposition of a requirement like this.
It is a difficult problem of anarchist practice, how to reach people in such a way as to empower them to act individually, and, hopefully, collectively. Left unmentioned in your professor’s comment is the frightening prospect that the ‘wretched’, however one defines them, may well gravitate towards rightist, populist social appeals if they are alienated by leftist, populist ones.
OT – Garth and Sara, the Walkupy people arrested this morning in Madison County, Georgia, have been release without charges. Pure harassment of “leaders” arrested before in Charlotte.
Most excellent points, Franz…
I was really impressed by that, he wasn’t going to go along with the separation of people into categories like occupier/homeless/gang member/substance abuser, separations that diminish the potential reach of the movement.
Something that I’ve been advocating here in Hilo, but, I’m not receiving any sort of consensus on…! 8-(
And…
…Left unmentioned in your professor’s comment is the frightening prospect that the ‘wretched’, however one defines them, may well gravitate towards rightist, populist social appeals if they are alienated by leftist, populist ones.
That’s something that many are not grasping, it does behoove us to be much more tolerant and accepting if we truly want to ‘Comfort the Afflicted, while Afflicting the Comfortable’…! *g*
Of all the stories hitting the surface about how Occupy groups handle the homeless situation, Buffalo’s seems the most restrictive and is probably not representative of the others. The demand to “participate” seems extreme, given that they are unlikely to be net-savvy activists up on the latest causes. Their more immediate concern is survival.
The demands of Occupy Buffalo for “participation” echo the practice of the Salvation Army with all its religious overtones, reflecting what is likely the strong religious background of the Buffalo occupiers. It might be a Buffalo thing. Kevin is unlikely to encounter the same elsewhere.
Each local Occupy movement has its own local situation and capabilities to deal with. And each has faced different issues at different stages in relating to the houseless. And in dealing with the complexity in our culture that manifests itself as different forms of houselessness.
The fundamental direction to a solution is structural change in the way society functions. I don’t think that there is any local Occupy movement that doesn’t understand that.
The difficulty is how do you balance that with the compassionate steps needed to deal with immediate and particular people who are houseless.
It is all too easy to become the functional equivalent of a homeless shelter and not have the resources to leverage that into structural change.
These decisions are not trivial; they are difficult and most likely the subject of long debates in general assemblies.
Different occupations have dealt with the issue in different ways. It is wise not to second-guess them.
But what is clear with every Occupy movement that actually begins 24/7 occupation is that there is as much trepidation by city authorities over making the houseless visible in their communities and exposing the size of the issue as there is over the rhetorical protests of the banks and the 1%. And that once houseless people show up at a 24/7 occupation, the city looks close and hard for health and safety issues in order to evict the occupation.
If there is an icon of this issue, it is Poet, who died in the Oklahoma City encampment.
That’s actually kind of funny. As if the right would want to have anything to do with the ‘wretched.’
Spot on. Occupy Harrisburg is located in as depressed a region as any. Whether or not it’s related, there are a vast number of churches in downtown Harrisburg, and on any given day at least one has a soup kitchen open in the downtown area. OH makes available the schedule the soup kitchens to those needing that resource, as well as location of shelters. In spite of that, it provides whatever food supplies that are available to whoever walks by needing it, and is also generous with available tent space for those not meeting the shelter curfew. No “participation” requirements are enforced.
My guess is that most of the other occupations handle the houseless situation somewhere along these lines. Buffalo seems to be on the more rigid end.
“And that once houseless people show up at a 24/7 occupation, the city looks close and hard for health and safety issues in order to evict the occupation.”
I guess it depends on what occupation you are talking about. The homeless were present at Occupy Oakland, Occupy Sacramento and Occupy SF from the inception. Probably Occupy LA, too, although I can’t say for certain.
The more fundamental question here is whether Occupy is a predominately middle and lower middle class movement of workers, whether employed or not, or whether it also includes more marginalized people. In California, it could not avoid including more marginalized people, like the homeless, because of the more extreme disparities of wealth and the lack of housing and services that have resulted from it. And, note, that there is no such thing as a uniform characterization of the homeless, they are a variegated group.
This is where the comment of Kevin’s professor about Fanon and the “wretched of the earth” is germane. Generally, most Marxists, with the exception of autonomous Marxist groups, would highlight the importance of the workers, the proletariat, in other words, while more anti-authoritarian types, such as anarchists, as just one example, would emphasize the participation of more marginalized people as well, like the homeless and the undocumented, people pejoratively described by Marx as “lumpenproletarians”.
Personally, I have no interest in such theoretical distinctions, and believe that Occupy should have a place, as much as it is possible to do so, for all the people victimized by this social order.
707! upside down laughing
Well, I understand hotflash too. (wink)
Hugs, and more power to ya!
Some of them do. This biggest problem is the supply chain and if they have enough food/sleeping bags/ etc.
Also, my opinion on the struggles is not due to disagreement in GA meetings, but agent provacatures and the combat units/police. Their struggle is multi-layered in survival. They are working constantly on message and action,food and shelter, local ordinances, and all kinds of other things just to stay occupied. Where occupations have plenty they share with the homeless and displaced. When they don’t, they try to direct them to soup kitchens and shelters.
MzChief,
You bring us some of the most important information that is hidden behind media curtains. Yeah, we have some real basket cases running things in DC. I don’t know what to say about Gillibrand or Feinstein, but the others have a double head problem. One is major cerebral insufficiency and the other is eenie, teenie, weenie.
I fully understand where you were coming from in looking at different social action philosophies. I think in 2012 you have to ask over against Marx, who exactly is a “worker”. Bougeois is properly understood as townfolk — the self-employed and merchants. Proletariat is properly understood as the folks who are essentially given enough resources to reproduce children who become “workers”. That gets beyond the technical philosophical accretions that 150 years of Marxist and Marxian theorists have created. The theoretical argument has likely become archaic.
The theoretical underpinning of the Occcupy movement is that there is in the world economy today a minority that has the political power to corrupt democratic governments and bleed off valuable resources — financial and natural. Call this the 1% for the sake of symbolism. And the remaining 99% work (or not) and pay taxes in order to ensure that the 1% don’t actually risk anything in the “captialist” economy. (Privatize the profits; socialize the losses.) And that anyone who sees that this is an issue is invited (even members of the 1%) are invited to participate in a general assembly to discuss the issue, analyze it in all its manifestations, and figure out immediate actions to take to deal with it. And, oh yes, a subset of those immediate actions is ensuring the right to speech and to assemble and petition for the redress of grievances. Another subset is direct action reallocating assets currently being made unproductive by the legal restrictions of the state. That’s pretty much it.
Within that broad invitation are various political philosophies from anarchists to socialists to communists to libertarians to liberals to conservatives. And anyone who self-selects to participate. From there on, it’s the participants (which is a constantly changing group) whose opinions guide the group–philosophical consistency be damned. It’s called democracy.
When looking actions, there are several types to choose among: using the existing structures as services; protesting the failures of the existing structures; building prototypes within the space controlled by the movement, occupying other space and transforming it from unproductive to productive. I have listed those essentially in order from less difficult to more difficult to do. Given the issues, those are also in order from least effective to most effective.
I think that there is general agreement in the Occupy movement that there should be a place for people victimized by the social order. The difficulty is when, where, and how to create that place. And how to make it ongoing instead of a temporary hope that soon disappears with the next raid. A number of local occupations, even without encampments, have created a homelessness working group to involve the homeless in the creation of solutions. And they get participation. The difficulties have to do with folks who don’t participate and for which there is not a large enough diversity of experiences among occupiers to be able to relate to them. The size of the local Occupy group is a big factor in the ability to act helpfully. As is the amount of government pressure on an encampment or even if an encampment exists. And the socio-economic composition of the occupiers.
It is not exclusively a middle-class movement nor a workers movement. But it does tend to have folks whose experience of the collapse of the dream is recent not chronic. In that, it is more experiential than philosophical.
Interesting. I see an enterprise information architecture. And what I know from experience is the the organizational units don’t all sign on to the plan. So what can go wrong is what caused the mission Carter sent to rescue the Iran hostages to go wrong: interservice rivalry. And within each service, inter-organizational rivalry. Silos exist because different organization have traditions of doing things differently. To get them to adopt a common way of doing things is a huge hairy political fight each step of the way. If there are plans of integrating information with DHS, the political problem gets compounded by all of the additional organizations.
I appreciate the thoughtfulness of your response. I agree with your overall perspective. As someone with a fairly radical, anti-authoritarian orientation, I have frequently said elsewhere in regard to Occupy that everyone with a preconceived political belief system is going to have relinquish something to which they have developed a strong attachment. That’s true of everyone, Marxists, anarchists, liberals, Christians, Kossacks, anyone. That’s because Occupy forces people to confront their belief system within the context of the reality of day to day life.
The peril, as I am sure you are aware, is that Occupy will, in its various manifestations, develop covert vanguardist tendencies. The fact that it tends to have people whose experience of the dream is recent, as opposed to those for whom it has been slight to non-existent, is a source of tension because those with experiences of historic oppression tend to respond negatively to those who have just recently encountered it.
Substance abuse is a serious issue, and people are put at tremendous risk by those who do not recognize that it has its own unique set of challenges, or assume that they are prepared to handle them when they’re not.
The #1 tactic of agent provocateurs in taking down occupations is to overwhelm them with a population of people with serious mental health and substance abuse issues that they do not have the skills and resources to deal with.
If you want to devote your time to exclusively dealing with the problems of serious mental illness and substance abuse, that’s tremendously laudable. Call yourself a homeless shelter and take it seriously. But there should not be a demand that an occupation assume those responsibilities if it overwhelms their resources and leads to their demise.
If people aren’t capable of or do not want to engage in activism, an occupation should not be expected to house them if they do not have adequate resources to do so. There are many ways to contribute to alleviating their suffering and helping them that do not require extending an encampment beyond its ability to survive.
When agent provocateurs want to weaken and deplete a camp, they engage in lofty philosophical arguments that basically amount to imposing do-gooder guilt on liberals to the point where they delude themselves into thinking they can take on more than they can handle. Then whatever services they can provide cease to be there, and no activism takes place.
Tellingly, few of them ever stick around to clean up the needles or break up the fights or rebuild the camp after it gets shut down.
A tongue-in-cheek call for the Great Aussie Wake Up:
Video- “Rap News 11: Australia Day (feat. special correspondent Ken Oathcarn)”
Young Americans willing to be arrested for walking (to DC) are speaking now on the Occupello live stream:
Will you be covering the World Social Forum taking place in Brazil beginning tomorrow, Kevin?
I think we are talking past each other a little. I am well aware of what you are talking about, it was clearly a tactic used by the NYPD against OWS. Shake Anderson wasn’t saying that occupations should admit everyone without requiring them, like everyone else, to conform to certain rules and responsibilities. Rather, he was refusing to play the Oakland Police Department game of admitting that the occupation would be delegitimized because someone considered a gang member or substance abuser was found to be in the camp. Being from Oakland, he was smart enough to understand that there were people like that in the plaza. After all, as you know, it’s not hard to be black or brown in Oakland, or any other city, for that matter, and be considered a gang member. I was primarily speaking to the issue as to whether homeless people should be excluded from an occupation unless they agree to participate in protest, which, curiously, is unrelated to the question as to what is required to assist their presence.
I expressed some of the same concerns for Occupy Portland re: substance abuse and mental illness when they made the decision to include and shelter the homeless, questioning whether they really had the resources or expertise to deal with those issues. Those in favor insisted that they did.
The camp was evicted ostensibly for reasons of public safety, and it was never clear to me whether OP was “winning” the struggle to maintain peace within the camp when they had a substantial homeless population – time didn’t get to tell on that one. But they certainly struggled with it.
I think you mean petit-bourgeoisie as the “townsfolk”, shopkeepers and professionals. Members of the proletariat are workers who exchange their labor-power for wages paid by the owners of the means of production. The bourgeoisie are the owners of the means of production. One major distinction between the proletariat and lumpenproletariat is that the former has a sense of class consciousness. The preceding four sentences are terribly simplistic and crude; many have spent countless hours studying the voluminous writings on class under capitalism and the arguments about what was “really” meant in the Marx & Engels era and what is meant now go on and on and on. If you have several decades remaining in your lifetime, and your eyesight will hold out for all the reading involved, go for it.
What I have been told by occupations in the throes of collapse is that if they do not require any assistance from anyone (homeless or not) in order to be accepted as a resident of the camp, that puts the burden of caring for the camp (and the needs of those individuals) on the shoulders of everyone else. And once the population of non-working (homeless or otherwise) is equal to or greater than the number of people who are performing the functions necessary to sustain the camp, it’s usually a matter of days until the camp goes under — frequently because they’re raided, but mostly because the camp is weak and is struggling under so many internal burdens it can no longer fight back.
I’m sure you’re much more experienced in these things than I am and have much more extensive knowledge as to why these occupiers I’m talking to are uninformed about what they’re experiencing. I naively concluded that operatives were trying to pour non-contributing homeless people with serious drug and mental health issues into the camps til they hit the magic number (50%). It seemed to me that when they raided the camps at that point the activist occupiers were often so happy to be relived of the burden they’d just go home and wouldn’t have the energy to rebuild.
Curiously, homeless activists are some of the most dedicated occupiers out there — in places like San Luis Obispo, Fort Wayne, Syracuse, and yes Buffalo. And to my untrained eye, it appears that those occupations that manage to stay open and keep providing services to the homeless population offer more help than those that shut down when they become overwhelmed by too many non-contributing people with too many needs and not enough contributing people to meet them. But I admit my knowledge is limited to what I’m told and I would not for a minute would I try to dictate morality to people who are out there living at the occupations and dealing with these issues on a day-in day-out basis.
That’s the sort of technical language I’m talking about, making these finer distinctions. Prior to Marx “bourgeois” meant the same thing as “burger” or “townsfolk”. And in Rome, proletarians were those who had enough resources to keep them alive enough to work and reproduce. Marx used this common knowledge among the classically educated of his time to form the basis for the construction of his technical vocabulary to describe the situation emerging with industrialization.
My point about not using this technical vocabulary relates to the changes brought about by the global financial collapse and the race to the bottom. It is more helpful to use more widely understood terms to analyze the current situation because it is different from the one Marx observed 150 years ago. Whatever the 1% are they are not townsfolk; they are cosmopolitan. And among the 99%, even those who own the means of production–the independent farmers, small businesses, and independent contractors–are at the mercy of the 1% either through oligopolistic sales prices or oligopsonistic purchase prices. One-sided contracts and the corporate use of the courts to exert control have made ownership of means of production less relevant in practice than ownership of the government institutions.
As simple as it is, I think the 1%-99% analysis is more relevant to the situation that most communities face than Marx’s analysis of 150 years ago. Marx’s analysis of the commodification of money still is relevant so long as there is something, even patches of magnetic fields on a hard drive somewhere, that functions as money. In fact, that seems to be an inescapable fact about money, as inescapable as gravity.
Appreciate your thoughtfulness. Perhaps, it was obscured because of my verbosity, but if you sift through what I said, I have agreed that occupations cannot take on responsibilities beyound their ability to perform. Of course, it is legitimate for occupations to insist that participants assist in the day to day operation of it. Note, for example there are some homeless people capable of doing so, and others that cannot. Along these lines there was also an occupation in Oakland by Lake Merritt, Snow Park, that, as far as I know, was a camp where the homeless played a prominent role in fulfilling the responsibilities of maintaining it. At this point, I would just emphasize that occupations should consider allowing people to stay in the camp and participate in the activities of the camp short of engaging in political protest, which, it seems, Buffalo is not doing, because it is unrealistic to assume that people drawn to an Occupy camp come with a fully realized social awareness to embrace protests. Wouldn’t it be better to embrace them, and seek to educate them towards involvement in political activity?
This is a great discussion, but I wish someone (not me- someone who can speak from experience and direct observation) could write it up and publish it in the front page to serve as research and guidance for those struggling to work through these issues.
The WH petitions (signature goals for each is 25,000 by a deadline) are getting turned around in about a day. The one calling for the investigation of admitted MPAA bribe taker Chris Dodd completed very fast.
The partial answer to your question re Feinstein is that she is also part of the MPAA “Dirty Dozen” and you can also tell her and 11 other US Senators take those bribes to
“Give Back Hollywood’s Dirty Money” (petition by FreePress.Net).
The WH petition to “End ACTA and Protect our right to privacy on the Internet” also needs finishing touches and your attention if you haven’t already signed here.
Let me clear up a mistake I made in spelling in the prior comment as I mean to refer to “Gillard” the Australian PM, not the US Senator from New York, “Gillabrand” (top campaign funders include Greenburg Taurig LLP with more details at InfluenceExplorer.Com). Since the advent of Wikileaks and the Assange, Aussies have discovered and are pissed that Gillard and the Parties are bought off by the 1%ers and think the system cannot be trusted (e.g. as evidenced by the repeated police brutality in Melbourne).
“Opening Labor to the sunshine” (Sydney Morning Herald, Jan. 7, 2012)
It doesn’t take much to figure out that Aussie activists are reviewing the detailed evidence. Yesterday observations of Gillard playing influence purchasing games with the Australian Labour Party (ALP) emerged. It flew across my desk and I am looking for that particular reference and will post it when I retrieve it.
Meanwhile, I am seeing a steady stream of “TANGO DOWN” in countries whose politicians and legislatures are trying to bypass democratic processes to sign their country’s versions of SOPA and the very draconian ACTA treaty.
Does anybody know if there is a web service available that serves up GA times for various OccupyX’s ? Also, is there any listing of exact locations for all of the OccupyX’s. I know FireDogLake has a list of OccupyX’s, but I don’t think it gives the exact address. Just the city location won’t work, for me.
I want the exact address so that I can geo-locate them on maps. So, latitude and longitude coordinates would work, also.