A contracting firm that specializes in anti-terrorism and force protection training, consulting and management services has been hired to train Cook County Sheriff’s Police in the run-up to the NATO-G8 meetings that are to be held in Chicago in May of this year.
The firm, Controlled FORCE Inc., bills itself as a “woman-owned small business” that provides a “low-liability method of subject control for law enforcement, adult corrections, juvenile justice, security, and military across the nation.” Its company profile claims it has a “unique ability to develop training curriculums and standardizations that integrate into existing programs,” which “has time and again exceeded expectations of federal, state, and local government agencies.” (FORCE stands for “first official response in a critical environment.”)
Anita Padilla, a reporter with the Fox News affiliate in Chicago recently met with Controlled FORCE staff. Controlled FORCE’s website has a photo up on the website. The reporter took the time to hear about the tactics Controlled FORCE is teaching police, who will be working the NATO/G8 protests. [Naturally, the reporter's understanding of these tactics will make it easier for her to be sympathetic toward police when they are throwing protesters' bodies to the ground in May. She will know that this is what they are trained to do and, if any violence happens, it is probably the fault of protesters, who were not properly submitting to the forceful arrest.]
The post with the picture describes a tactic that will likely be used to take out protesters perceived as threats:
The Controlled F.O.R.C.E. Mechanical Advantage Control Holds™ (M.A.C.H.) System of subject control provides the Arrest Team with a non-violent arrest control option to quickly and decisively remove individual threats before they have a chance to incite greater unrest. Using M.A.C.H. Team Arrest Tactics, no more than three Arrest Team members should be needed to restrain and remove a subject – no matter how hard the subject resists. The M.A.C.H. System allows security members to remove individual threats without using pain compliance or techniques that appear unnecessarily violent, which reduces the chance that others in the crowd will react with violence toward the arrest team.[emphasis added]
Controlled FORCE is an option for security training that takes into account how protesters widely use cell phones and video cameras now to record “crowd control” tactics police use at protests:
Crowd management operations must be mindful of the fact that they perform in very public environments where everyone in and around a crowd has picture/video capabilities on their mobile phones. The Controlled F.O.R.C.E. Crowd Management Program offers a “camera friendly” solution to crowd management that is more effective than other use of force options and will reduce personal injury and legal risk for security members and managers.
A city official might hope this training comes with a guarantee that “crowd management” will “reduce personal injury and legal risk for security members and managers.” The city of Chicago paid out $126 million to settle police misconduct cases from 2000 to October 2007. (Though, the city may not be on the hook for lawsuits against “security members and managers” or police and other deputized forces at the protests. The White House recently said they Chicago taxpayers won’t be “saddled” with the tab for security.)
Padilla’s story is a good example of what happens when one embeds with a private contracting firm that will be there to control and suppress protest. No potential protesters, like people from Occupy Chicago, are given an opportunity to react to this idea that “no one knows for sure how many protestors will descend on Chicago for the summits, but there is the potential for violence.” Not even the Coalition Against NATO/G8, which has secured permits for a protest and march, is asked about the city police being trained by this contracting firm and whether they expect violence.
Tony Grano, who has trained US Marines, police and security forces in America, tells Padilla:
[Protesters] need to be handled with kid gloves, but there’s a job that still needs to be done, and that is to maintain order. Back in the old days when we used to do this, somebody started coming to help during a fight started jumping in, gets their two seconds in. That isn’t fine today. There are video cameras, cell phones, so you have to be careful,
Basically, Grano works for a firm that is necessary now because YouTube exists, because there is Twitter and the Internet, which can spread evidence of police brutality quickly. Controlled FORCE’s value is that it teaches police a tactic that will not look obviously brutal if the tactic is caught on video.
Padilla’s report notes the baton is a “last resort” (or should be a last resort). A former combat Marine, now a trainer, tells her, “The baton is really an extension of the arm. It can be used to make a protestor comply. The goal…is to make sure police officers go home at the end of the day and no one is hurt.”
As for the protestors, who cares? They’re all possible “threats” and all security present is there to neutralize “threats” and prevent “threats” from escalating. If someone gets hurt while police are trying to make an arrest, someone that is just nearby the “threat” and doesn’t get out of the way of police in time to avoid injury, what does it matter? So long as no police officer is hurt, all is well.
This is just one way security for the NATO/G8 meetings is being militarized, as all security for “national special security events” like this are now [see this video of a secret exercise conducted in a Chicago suburb]. And, when police use these tactics on protesters between May 19 and May 21, when the meetings take place, they will likely be helping to enforce Chicago Mayor Rahm Emanuel’s new ordinances, which he shocked the Chicago city council into passing and which place great restrictions on First Amendment activities in Chicago.
Here is video of one of the tactics that police will be learning over the next months:



43 Comments

Interesting. I wonder who’s getting the kickback.
They provide batons that are matched to a standard of close quarters subject control training.
They are a licensed dealer for 400 companies, including:
3M
5.11 Tactical
BlackHawk
Bushnell
Camelbak
Diamondback
Don Hume
EOTech
GunLok
LE Targets
Mag Lite
Monadnock
Nikon
Safariland
Streamlight
Surefire
Taser
Under Armour
Yes we now are very clear on the “2012 United States Government Terrorist Identification Chart.”
As for this
it is an ancient contractor trick. The important thing is that Controlled F.O.R.C.E. is on GSA to be paid for whatever faceless human work units for which they bill. The persons that actually do the work are not of importance (please review the Lincoln Group). And, yes, the US tax payer could be paying for mercs. Why it is! See Blackwater (contract ends Jan. 31, 2015) on GSAAdvantage.Gov:
More …
State of Illinois Corporate File Detail Report for Controlled F.O.R.C.E.
Manufacturers Controlled F.O.R.C.E. is selling for on GSAAdvantage which includes “family-owned” Wellington, FL manufacturer, Torfino Enterprises, Inc.
Florida Dept. of State Division of Corporations record for Torfino Enterprises, Inc.
District Court of Appeal of Florida,Fourth District.: RIVERA v. TORFINO ENTERPRISES INC. Michele RIVERA, Appellant, v. TORFINO ENTERPRISES, INC., Appellee. No. 4D04-1358. November 30, 2005 (from Findlaw.Com)
Orders placed through them earn training credits for their courses.
Their training operation is a front for sales.
Apparently if I quote the terms of their training, it triggers the FDL spam detector.
If there is a board of directors, I can’t find it. Note that there are some instructors from Illinois. I only saw 2 female instructors in this woman owned business.
Does Cook County go through GSA Advantage for some purchases. The contract is apparently with the Cook County Sheriff’s Department.
The kickback would go to someone affiliated with Cook County’s purchasing decision-making for the Sheriff’s Department.
Obviously the company gets commissions or discounts on its cost of goods for sales.
Another interesting video:
Controlled F.O.R.C.E. MACH Training for the Navy at Lackland AFB
Mark Pinella from Wheaton Ill. Why does that name ring a bell? Listed on Friends of Diana juarez-Grano.
Ding. Ding. Ding.
Here’s the top level public record I’m looking at in GSAAdvantage.Gov:
All I get that’s more meaty is the .PDF as linked therein above. They’re “Schedule 84″ just like Blackwater. What does that mean/entail?
Funny how that is a recurring theme we’re finding in the world of policing.
List is here:
GSA eLibrary: Schedule List
If it looks like a boondoggle, smells like a boondoggle, sounds like a boondoggle, and walks like a boondoggle–it’s a boondoggle.
I was curious to see if I could find a six degree separation between Rahm and Controlled FORCE.
I just caught the “authorizes state and local governments” phrase.
Is it really six–or closer?
I take it that Pinella ties back to Rahm, or is it Diana Juarez-Grano? I’m dense this afternoon.
So we have this contracting mechanism for getting a tank in Buffalo, NY plus one that allows city officials to use GSAAdvantage.Gov to get Blackwater in their town on demand but I still want to see the answers to my questions here. I am definitely hanging on that “related services” phrase as it seems very area 51-y to me.
Tangential– “When Was the Last Time a Pope Was Shit-faced Drunk On the Streets of Paris?” (emptywheel.net, by Jim White, Feb. 3, 2012)
I don’t know if anyone has ties to Rahm. The name Pinella sound very, very familiar to me, though.
Section III (a) and (b) of one of the ordinances passed in the City Council & applicable to this:
The contract is not with the CPD but with the Cook County Sheriff. There no doubt is some security planning interagency (and probably international) task force. Rahm no doubt can get the other jurisdictions fast-tracked through the federal government bureaucracy.
Chicago, being what it is, who’s getting the kickback from Controlled Force?
btw, the TarheelDem Twitter account is now following you.
Something really strange is up regarding FORCE’s emphasizing that their crowd control tactics would look to be appropriate on camera. How do I know that?
BECAUSE IN ILLINOIS IT IS A FELONY TO RECORD POLICE OFFICERS IN THE LINE OF DUTY!!!
And in recent court cases the authorities have enforced this law vigorously. No one is going to record the cops, or they are going to have an elaborate way to conceal what they are doing and send the feed to an out of state outlet if they do.
American Fascism: Since 1929 propagating a doomed system designed to pacify and control the populace through propaganda, fear, and intimidation. A system that exploits human labor to the point of dehumanization and makes all things subjects to the lords of the profit margin. War and death creates profits therefore acceptable and just to the profiteers. Elections are farces to obfuscate the true masters of the world who will not change even as their system falls in on itself.
I don’t think it is a bad thing for police to get better training in how to subdue people without injuring them and with less risk of the conflict escalating. Currently, police tend to have overly violent and damaging responses. As for any police action intended to “get away with something” in front of cameras or to stop transparency into how the individual cops act in a conflict of any sort, I am opposed to that but it is a different issue.
As for the technique demonstrated in the video, they exact takedown used (use of arm or baton against the elbow with an off-balance attacker) is about as standard a judo/hapkido/aikido move as I have ever been trained on (and I have trained in all three of those schools).
I just don’t see an issue.
Boy it’s a heak of a place. So let me see if I’m getting this right, the more you try and protest the more the authority’s will crack down on you. So what’s one to do? Follow the money right! How are they paying for this? Where is the original dollars coming from? I guess it would probably be a good Idea to not showup. If I worked less hours and paid less taxes how long could they run up the bill?
Chicago, being what it is, I’d guess Rahm.
Muy agreeamente! You get a nice cushy blue mat to lie on and make you comfy. Right, what’s the big fuss?
try an asphalt concrete mat.
I heard that M.A.C.H used to be called K.I.L.L. H.I.P.P.I.E.S., but for some reason it was deemed politically insensitive.
Hope your momma’s among the protesters.
The issue is who they are going to take down and for what reasons. The reason there will be police needed in the first place is that a protest is taking place that Rahm Emmanuel doesn’t want to spoil his NATO/G8 Summit. So the purpose is suppression of lawful speech and lawful peaceful assembly. That is problematic.
Second, when they decide to clear the crowd, they will either arrest randomly or try to kettle a large group for essentially indefinite detention until the NATO/G8 Summit is over. That is essentially arrest without probable cause. The charge will be “disobeying a lawful police order” (even though they weren’t) or “resisting arrest” (which is a catch-22 charge if there is no probable cause). And the courts have let them get away with violating the US Constitution and will again.
Third, in order to deter other people from civil disobedience, they want the experience to be as painful and inconvenient as possible. But they do not want it to be visible where the pain is coming from.
Fourth, three months training is unlikely to prepare all members of the sheriff’s police force to do these moves flawlessly. The contract seems to be as much about PR as action training (or about sales of equipment).
Fifth, the Cook County Sheriff’s Police are only one unit of the massive police presence likely to be deployed with the Chicago Police Department as its core. Are they all getting the same training?
Last, folks rarely operate out of new traning; old habits are hard to break and there are institutional resistances to “babying the protesters”. How likely are these techniques actually going to be visible in Chicago?
Guess we lost a comment. Nope. My momma’s not going to be among the protesters. But if my feet hold out, I’ll be there.
Class War is no longer a figure of speech. The 1% is bringing literal, militarized war against unarmed, non-violent protesters.
I wonder if Occupy Supply will be able to bring helmets, gas masks and body armor to Chicago in time for the festivities.
I thought it was the audio that was against the law, and that video without sound recording was ok. I could well be wrong.
In Chicago, merely gazing at the police in a disapproving manner is against the law.
It was rightfully deleted. Hope your feet hold out!
Yep, home of that wonderful demodog raul.
New Orleans came first, but Chicago is where the police state of Amerika really starts kicking in. Mercenary trained cops, ready to bust heads because people will be …marching. I fear for what it is going to look like at the 2 major political conventions. New (unconstitutional) laws have been passed and now the government is going to see how far it can ram its boot up your a$$.
Pay attention to what happens here, because I guarantee that the cops will be the ones being violent. And their agent provocateurs. It is going to be illegal to have a sign and walk. It is going to be illegal to speak. It will be illegal to hand out literature. Mass arrests will take place.
It is basically a warm up for in the near future when Amerikan austerity kicks in, because the economy is not getting any better no matter who is president in 2013. These meetings are only for the world’s elite to slice the pie further in their favor and get as much from you as possible.
End of rant.
Peace
Well I sure hope you do it better than that guy in the video. I’ve been teaching people to do that technique for thirty years, and that was pathetic.
Also, how is kneecapping a knee with your nightstick advisable?