(update below)
Miami multimedia journalist Carlos Miller, arrested by Miami-Dade police during the eviction of Occupy Miami, has posted video he recovered from his camera. The footage is believed to have been deleted by police when he was in custody.
Miller was able to access the deleted video. In a post, he concludes police spokesperson Nancy Perez allowed other media to walk past her to cover the news event and arbitrarily chose to arrest him.
The recovered video of Miller’s arrest was put up on YouTube. The police can be seen falling out of their “military formation.” A group of cops walk past him, which Miller believes is indication “all the activists had been dispersed.”
There is a television cameraman, who is permitted to exercise his press freedom. He can be seen in the video “dressed in blue standing on the sidewalk.” Miller thinks he recorded the arrest. There’s also another shot of a television cameraman later in the video and he gets a “close-up of the cops.”
It shows that police had already fallen out of their military formation, which they had been in all night as they dispersed the activists. The operation was pretty much over.
A Miami Herald reporter is also in the video. [As Miller notes in his post, he mentioned Miller’s arrest “in the fifth paragraph of this story.”
The video shows videographers freely moving by police without being intercepted for any arrests. Suddenly, fifty seconds into the video, Perez steps up to detain Miller. The words she utters are, “No, it doesn’t work that way,” when Miller tries to explain to her he is heading back to his car now.
Most of the video was recovered but there are interruptions here and there. Below is the clip of Miller’s arrest:
Miller is not going to let this go (and he shouldn’t). He describes his plan for what he intends to do from here so he can clear his name:
So now the next step is taking my camera to a professional recovery service with a forensics specialists who will not only retrieve the entire deleted footage without interruptions, but would also determine the exact time the footage was deleted
That will determined that the footage was deleted while I was in custody and the camera was in their possession, leaving them no defense for blatantly violating my Constitutional rights.
I also plan on obtaining the footage recorded by the Miami police officer as well as the footage recorded by the television news cameraman.
And, of course, I plan on filing an internal affairs complaint against Perez as well as a complaint with the U.S. Department of Justice for deleting my footage.
Miller was charged with “resisting arrest.” The video shows he was not resisting at all.
Constitutional and media lawyers, he says, are interested in getting involved and may join his legal team as he advances his case against the Miami-Dade Police Department.
As he notes in his post, the Justice Department determined in a “statement of interest”:
The right to record police officers while performing duties in a public place as well as the right to be protected from the warrantless seizure and destruction of those recordings, are not only required by the Constitution…They are consistent with our fundamental notions of liberty, promote the accountability of our governmental officers, and instill public confidence in the police officers who serve us daily.
Miller is just one of over sixty-five journalists that have been targeted, detained and/or arrested since the Occupy movement kicked off on Wall Street last September.
Update
The ACLU collaborated with actor Joseph Gordon-Levitt and the Gregory Brothers on this animated video on photographers’ rights.
The animation features a song with a catchy chorus. The lyrics for it are the following:
They can’t turn the lights off now/The world is much too small/Cause everybody’s pluggin’ in/They’re passing on the wake up call/Corruption thrives on secrecy/Transparency is up to you and me/If we really want to see the truth/And we wanna see the truth set free for all.



38 Comments

“The right to record police officers while performing duties in a public place as well as the right to be protected from the warrantless seizure and destruction of those recordings, are not only required by the Constitution…They are consistent with our fundamental notions of liberty…”
Clearly, the Constitution does not apply here. Also, Chicago is exempt, especially for G8/NATO protests.
Huh? Sarcasm?
Ooop. That wasn’t clear. I mean that the constitutional protections we expect to protect the freedom of the press are not being respected, as evidenced in this video. Not only that, but Chicago has laws against filming the police, which is indefensible, IMO.
Crikey, I can’t seem to type or make sense today.
Not just Chicago. All of Illinois.
And a judge has actually defended the law by saying:
The officer holding the journalist down and taunting him about “a woman is doing blah to you” etc should be fired, prosecuted for assault as well as abuse of her authority, and incarcerated in a maximum sentence situation. She is exhibiting classic sadomasochistic behavior and has no business being in public let alone being part of a police force.
Au contraire. Occifers doing such will be quickly promoted.
Cops get away with waaaay too much of this shit. In Seattle, where I live, the police are absolutely infamous for abusing people like we see on this video. (Seattle PD just got through getting a very bad review from the USDOJ) The entire I-am-the-law mindstate needs to be erased from the people inhabiting police departments. The best way to start that erasing is with firings and prosecutions.
Ahem. Guiliani, Bloomberg, CIA, etc. 41 shots while black guy is getting out wallet. Police baton (or was it broom handle) in rectum.
Don’t want arm wrestling contest on which pigs are the worstest. Just thought worthwhile to weigh in.
Don’t see any other point besides “my city is bigger than yours” which quite frankly is an attitude from New Yorkers that many people find absolutely grating. You might look into the murder of John Williams, the only months-old report from the Federal Justice Department following a long investigation of SPD that the DOJ voluntarily pursued after publicly visible incidents of abuse, violence, killing, rights violations, etc. just kept coming and coming from Seattle.
I mean, whatever, SPD is a dirty police force. Neither New York nor Seattle probably have anything at all on for example the Oakland police who are just plain criminally violent.
I’m so glad that Miami’s finest have nothing better to do with their military paraphernalia:
They should put a chunk of this video up on CNN or MSNBC, the part with the sadistic female cop abusing the male journalist, violating his rights while tormenting him over it, and see what people have to say. They should put the cop’s name, badge number, and precinct up so that her department takes heat. The first game her department will try to play is “we can’t really identify this officer from this terrible video, so sorry” – that is game #1 the cops play, I learned that the hard way back in the WTO protests in Seattle when SPD would dress in riot drag and deliberately put dark tape over their visible badge numbers before clubbing people etc. Don’t let the Miami “police” get away with this crap.
Do those incidences of robbery and assault include violent and abusive acts like police confiscating peoples’ cameras and manhandling or beating people for no good reason?
Calculated (not sure I had stats right) that Oakland PD was 10% per pop of NYC. When you are that underfunded & understaffed, prolly more important undertrained*, hard to imagine any other than a violent outcome.
* Several decades ago, a HS classmate served briefly as PR for NYPD. She told me whole problem was training, i.e. lack thereof, or as we now know, purposeful training in causing violence and ability to blame it on victims.
No. Those don’t count, since steroid (ab)use is treated as an extenuating circumstance.
Clap. Clap. Tiny nuts.
I won’t be making any excuses for violent cops, myself. It’s really easy: each and every one of them knows when they are going to:
1) Shoot someone without justification.
2) Beat someone without justification.
3) Manhandle and/or verbally assault someone without justification hoping to provoke a fight so that they can get their hands on someone.
4) Plant evidence on someone.
5) Lie on a police report about someone.
6) Falsely arrest someone.
7) Lie in court about someone.
8) Violate someone’s rights and protections in the belief that the person doesn’t know enough about his/her rights and protections to fight back.
9) Do any of the above knowing full-well that the police union, police department, and local Mayor’s office will attempt to stifle and stonewall any accountability or transparency.
It’s really easy. Cops go to three years of cop school followed by on-the-job mentoring and training. Big city cops work for police departments that have contact with big city prosecutors’ offices, big city defense lawyers, and wealthy political leaders, all of which together add up to an environment in which the damn cops all know better than to do what they do.
And they lie, abuse, and get violent, every day.
Not any more. Many municipalities are waiving the degree in law enforcement in lieu of military service. This has the extra “bonus” of hiring cops who view the rest of us not as the citizens who they work for but as threats. As long as this practice is allowed, it can only get worse.
Couldn’t agree more! I am not dumping on veterans when I point out that training and practice in discharging an automatic rifle at people, along with maintaining a conservative appearance and disposition, is not a qualification for working in a police force.
Only jury I served on I hung bc I found defective’s testimony to be ludicrous. Other 11 asked me why would he lie, I said to get the case off his desk, they were shocked.
Was Jan 86, shuttle blew up while we were confablulating. I’ll never forget it.
Yep.
Have contact with the cops. Watch them make up bullshit as they go just to get at you. Or watch them make up bullshit just to make something they want to go away do just that.
For my part, I believe that police unions should be abolished, and that all cops should hold regular four-year degrees in law enforcement *prior to* beginning cop school. These two changes would profoundly effect the quality of law enforcement.
Military “training” to go back to an earlier point, is now to kill, kill, kill. After figuring out that only 1/7 shots fired by U.S. military during WWII were actually fired at ‘enemy.’
Much more violence introduced in recent years. Equipment not the least.
I think police unions shouldn’t be abolished, just reformed. Silly me.
On edit: Would like to think that thick Blue Line is a self-protective result of scapegoating lowest guy on totem pole by scumbags at top.
I agree and as a veteran, I don’t see that as dumping on vets so much as an accurate assessment of the reality.
I agree with that. Police unions can do good things but this whole “us against them” attitude fosters reflexive support where it’s not warranted and defense of the abominable and indefensible. That part has to stop. Period.
Cops and the military mixing. What could be better? Picture two scenes.
Scene One: Soldiers getting ready to storm a house. The commander says, “Cover me!” So his fellow troops start shooting at anything that may be hiding someone.
Scene Two: Cops walk up to a house. The commander says, “Cover me!” So his fellows pull out their guns and point at anything that may pose a threat.
Say the previous to any soldier and before you get done, they will understand why a seamless transfer between the two is not a good idea.
Purposeful part of 1%ers turning us against each other.
And really I don’t have anything against veterans per se. I am not a veteran, I have never been in the military, and I don’t claim to have a big understanding of those who do go into the military.
I was thinking of the whole “cops against the rest of us” paradigm actually. The point that the one percent try to pit us against each other is certainly a fair assessment though in my opinion.
My issue with police unions is basically the result of seeing the Seattle Police Guild run up and defend every bad cop and bad cop act to become publicly visible, ever. The union stonewalls investigations, lies to the public, threatens public officials electorally if they try to reform the union, protects bad cops, all of it. The local Guild is so bad it would be a joke if it wasn’t so sad, what they will rush to protect and conceal.
People who join the military represent a cross section of the United States politically, philosophically and ethnically but with an emphasis on working class roots. The officers have been to college of course but for probably the majority of enlistees, the service is the only chance they’ll ever have of seeing higher education.
I understand that. I’m raising the issue of what is their alternative. If they don’t defend each other, they will get washed out. If they do defend each other, they will lose peeps like us who would like to see their side. It’s a lose-lose for cops, easily est by 1%ers to rub every 99ers nose in the dirt.
That certainly describes it. So where to break the cycle? Where to cut the Gordian knot? Or are there multiple wheres?
I have been wondering whether WiFi SD cards could work around this attempt to destroy pix and video. Footage or snaps could be streamed to “the cloud” or to hard drives outside the police perimeter.
Trying to keep up with Oakland tonight. Also, several GS’s are in discussion across the country.
Keep it classy, Oakland!
oops. GA’s not GS’s. Of course some of them have been.
That is what UStream does. Automatically arcives sections of video on their servers that protects it from police erasure. Which is why in recent raids the police have deployed a human wall to block livestreamers’ views or arrest livestreamers without cause. The automatic archiving capability provides a layer of credibility to livestreamers’ coverage.
Latest police training video? Stay till the end: http://www.lvrj.com/news/video-shows-officers-beating-motorist-in-diabetic-shock-138901274.html
I think this capability exists but most streamers are probably unaware. So, they lose their footage because they are arrested and cannot hit “Save.” Or an officer takes the phone from them and makes sure the footage isn’t saved.