NYPD Commissioner Ray Kelly (photo: Wikimedia Commons)
(update below)
Student associations at schools in the northeastern United States have demanded the attorney general probe the New York Police Department’s (NYPD) “secret surveillance” of students in their associations. The demand comes after investigative reporting published by the Associated Press revealed the NYPD conducted surveillance of Muslim students at Rutgers University, Yale, Columbia, New York University (NYU), University of Buffalo and other schools.
Students and administrators were not aware of the program before the AP published their story. Most of the schools’ administrators appear to have remained neutral when asked to react to news that their students were under surveillance. The City College of New York (CCNY), however, put out a bold statement:
The City College of New York does not accept or condone any investigation of any student organization based on the political or religious content of its ideas…Absent specific evidence linking a member of the City College community to criminal activity, we do not condone this kind of investigation.
University at Buffalo also responded with a strong statement in support of students:
UB does not conduct this kind of surveillance and if asked, UB would not voluntarily cooperate with such a request…As a public university, UB strongly supports the values of freedom of speech and assembly, freedom of religion, and a reasonable expectation of privacy.
And, the spokesman for Columbia University, Robert Hornsby, stated:
Like New York City itself, American universities are admired across the globe as places that welcome a diversity of people and viewpoints. So we would obviously be concerned about anything that could chill our essential values of academic freedom or intrude on student privacy,
The story of the University at Buffalo student surveilled is one of the most chilling stories in the NYPD reports the AP examined.
The student, Khan, was “a board member of the Muslim Student Association at the University at Buffalo.” She received an announcement for an upcoming conference, “Fifth Annual Convention of Reviving the Islamic Spirit.”
At the time, there were no details on who would be speaking. AP reports Khan never even went to the conference. She only forwarded it to other students in a Yahoo chat group. But, this was enough to attract the attention of the NYPD, which began to link her to “radical” scholars who were scheduled to speak at the conference.

The above photo is a section of the report showing how the NYPD’s Cyber Intelligence Unit connected Khan to Tariq Ramadan. The history shows how Ramadan had been a target of the US government for some time. His visa was revoked because he gave money to a Palestinian group. It was reinstated in 2010 after Ramadan filed a lawsuit.
The report noted other speakers: Siraj Wahaj, a New York imam, once listed on a “3 ½-page list of people” considered to be alleged co-conspirators in the 1993 World Trade Center bombing, and Hamza Yusuf and Zaid Shakir, two “prominent Muslim scholars” that have given lectures at “top universities.” Wahaj has never been charged with anything and, as AP notes, “Yusuf met with President George W. Bush at the White House following the 2001 terrorist attacks.”
Paul Browne, spokesperson for the NYPD (who’s job it is to lie about what the police department is actually doing) says, “Students who advertised events or sent emails about regular events should not be worried about a ‘terrorism file’ being kept on them. NYPD only investigated persons who we had reasonable suspicion to believe might be involved in unlawful activities.” This is grossly insensitive.
In the NYPD mindset, Khan was now linked to Muslim radical scholars, who have been tracked by the US government. If she were to be politically active, the government would most certainly be able to look at this report. If she wanted to support Palestinians or any Muslim groups abroad, the surveillance would resume. Though she did nothing wrong, her political activism could, in that mindset, justify subjecting her friends and family to more covert and unjustified surveillance.
These may all be students, who have done nothing wrong, but that lets the NYPD off the hook. Do not ignore the previous investigative reporting the AP has done, which revealed the NYPD conducted surveillance of Muslims and mosques. The NYPD was looking for “signs” of “Iranian terrorists.” The NYPD also “shadowed” Muslims who changed their names. And, the CIA helped the NYPD spy on Muslims.
This is not the first time there have been revelations on the NYPD’s spying on students in the past year. In October 2011, AP reported Muslim student groups at Brooklyn College and other city universities were being monitored.
…undercover officers from the department’s Special Services Unit attended events organized by Muslim students, the official said, as did members of the NYPD’s Demographics Unit, a secret squad that used plainclothes officers of Arab descent to monitor neighborhoods and events.
The NYPD’s Cyber Intelligence Unit used speakers of Arabic, Persian and other languages to monitor the websites of Muslim student organizations. They trolled chat rooms and talked to students online…
Why does the NYPD need all this surveillance?
It could be how the government gets its next batch of Muslim “terror suspects” to target and entrap in sting operations, not dissimilar to what happened with the Newburgh Four. It could be how the NYPD helps the government ensure that no student groups build strong ties with any charities or nonprofit groups in the Middle East, who might aid Palestinians or Muslims suffering directly or indirectly as a result of the US government’s unbridled support for Israel and the “war on terrorism.” Or, it could be this is just another front in the war on solidarity activist groups in America.
The threat of homegrown Muslim terrorism is “overblown.” A stunning fact is that, since the 9/11 attacks, Muslim-American terrorist plots have killed only 33 people. In contrast, there have been over 150,000 murders in the US. Gang violence is much more of a problem for Americans than the threat of homegrown terrorism. However, the NYPD does not appear to be working to keep Americans safe. It appears to be working as a tool of US empire, an agency that watches and invades the privacy of anyone who says anything that might threaten America’s projection of power in the Middle East.
Update
Below is Democracy Now!’s coverage of NYPD’s secret surveillance of Muslim students. The show focuses on an aspect of the report that I unintentionally glossed over.
AP uncovered an instance where the NYPD sent an undercover cop on a whitewater rafting trip in upstate New York. The agent recorded the names of students and submitted a report that mentioned the number of times they had prayed. (The number was actually incorrect.)
Jawad Rasul, one of the students who went on the trip, appeared on the show this morning. He said of the undercover cop:
Sometimes he would say he lived in Westchester, sometimes he lived in Long Island. He would always be available for all the trips, even though he said that he worked. And we didn’t see him attending a lot of classes, but he used to always be in the lounge area.
Mongi Dhaouadi, executive director of the Connecticut chapter of the Council of American-Islamic Relations (CAIR), was also on the show. He discussed the surveillance of students at Yale University.



19 Comments

Fascism!
McCarthyism.
It’s ours. We own it. Hard to get rid of once and for all.
And this is just New York. Does anybody think the cops in Philly, LA, or Columbus are doing anything differently?
Boxturtle (Why on earth would anyone call 911 in this day and age?)
This is genuinely disgraceful. There is a legal question that asks by “what rights” or “what authority.” Where is the authority for such invasion of privacy? Who should have to answer? I hope this is not offensive, but Muslims are the new Blacks when it comes to abuse and disregard. Good citizens should not allow this extension of gov. authority.
Keep in mind that i don’t agree with the police actions, but I can tell you how they’d defend them.
1) They are public places. A cop can go to any public place he wants to and look. So can you. So that spying is not illegal.
2) The information the police collected was mainly public records. Once again, public.
3) Even if neither ofthe above is true in a given case, they have probable cause due to the links to the various groups.
4) In the event of a civil suit, the person has to she she was damaged by the police conduct and must quantify the damages.
Bottom line, they’re within the law. If we want to stop this, we’ll have to use negative publicity.
Boxturtle (And even if we stop the cops, the spooks will continue doing whatever they’re doing)
They’re within the law just as J. Edgar Hoover was within the law spying on Dr. Martin Luther King, and other “suspicious radical elements” in the sixties. And they’re just as much fascists, if not more so.
But hey, they’re just following orders, amirite?
I don’t understand what all the to-do us about. The USG keeps every piece of communications that every U.S. citizen does at gigantic server farms and it is key word searchable. Why is this special case being singled out as particularly heinous.
Inquisition. Facists just like to do oppression, it’s not part of the definition. Police State is better yet.
Ah, NYPD the gestapo of Wall Street. Securing the rights and liberty of the few from the actions of the many. Dedicated to serve and protect the hideous actions of the rich, while further eroding the liberties of the downtrodden. “Up against the wall,motherfu#ker!
See! Conspiring with known terrorists!
False Positives.
There are three results to a search
1. Search criteria too strict, and the search missed a number of potential matches.
2. Exactly correct, and the search provided exactly for what one was searching. (Probability of this, tiny, miniscule, or even less).
3. Wide search criteria, and this generates false positives (or identifies innocent people as suspects).
The last is how credit bureau match debts to debtors. I’m also sure that the debt collection industry is honest and never collects a debt twice.
The more automated these system, the worse the results. For example: The list of “suspects” for (3) is now feed into other system that are deigned to probe into one’s life more deeply. Or to release a list of suspects and the media condemns a person; although I’m sure our responsible media would never condemn someone and damage their right to due process.
We are dealing with honorable people here, debt collectors, out responsible media, and no hidden agenda.
Just like slavery was within the law and protected by US Congress!
How could that be true? After all, the NYPD supervisors wear white shirts, not brown.
Nazi Germany was a police state. Children turned in parents to the Gestapo, for speaking ill of the sociopath.
I do not know enough to argue, but Buffalo is asserting a reasonable expectation of privacy…not seeming to agree that everything is open to scrutiny. Still scary to me.
Are folks commenting experiencing lots of data base errors and timeouts, here? Seems to take a long time to connect to this site these days. Meanwhile, connections to “other sites,” connect in a heartbeat? Just wondering as comments sometimes don’t even timeout, just vanish!
I noticed some of that yesterday. Don’t know whether to attribute it to my using Firefox or something else.
Meanwhile, we have high profile politicians and public officials meeting openly with leaders of an organization that is on the State Department’s Terrorist Watch List, MEK, Mujahedin-e Khalq. BUt you’re only a terrorist when we say so
“…you’re only a terrorist when we say so.”
Just like the Nazis?