Pfc. Bradley Manning, the soldier accused of releasing classified information to WikiLeaks, was back in court yesterday for an afternoon hearing. The judge ordered military prosecutors to hand over key damage reports from the CIA, FBI, State Department and the Office of the National Counter Intelligence Executive (ONCIX). She also ordered prosecutors to do an accounting of what they had done to search for evidence discoverable to the defense.
I appeared on “The Alyona Show” and was interviewed by Kristine Frazao, who was filling in for Alyona Minkovski. Frazao and I discussed the “small victory” Manning’s defense won on Monday, how the rulings ensure the prosecutors aren’t misrepresenting what evidence they know exists to the defense and how the media center press normally use to cover proceedings was booked for a retirement party. I mention how WL Central’s Alexa O’Brien was threatened with being detained by a military police officer.
We briefly touch upon WikiLeaks editor-in-chief’s request for political asylum in Ecuador and a letter of support for Assange that Noam Chomsky, Bill Maher, Glenn Greenwald, Thomas Drake, Michael Moore, Danny Glover, Jesselyn Radack, Jacob Appelbaum and many others including myself have signed.
Additionally, if video is not your kind of medium to get news from, I was interviewed by Free Speech Radio News on the latest developments in the court martial proceedings. You can listen to that interview here. I also was interviewed for Out-FM’s LGBT Pride special. I talked about Manning’s “gayness” and his gender identity issues. You can listen to both parts of the interview, which aired on July 24 and 26, here.
Finally, some news: followers of my reporting on the court martial might know that I am a plaintiff in a lawsuit being brought by the Center for Constitutional Rights (CCR) that demands the press and public be granted access to records from the court martial proceedings. Others who have signed on as plaintiffs are Salon blogger Glenn Greenwald, Amy Goodman of Democracy Now!, The Nation magazine, Nation national security correspondent Jeremy Scahill, WikiLeaks, publisher Julian Assange and author of The Passion of Bradley Manning and contributing editor to The American Conservative, Chase Madar.
The news is CCR filed an appeal to the Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces (CAAF). The appeal is being filed because nearly a week ago the Army Court of Criminal Appeals (ACCA) denied the request for access to records and gave no explanation. The denial was one-sentence long.
Here’s a bit from the filed appeal:
…No public notice of any motion by the government to seal parts of the judicial record here was made such that members of the press and public would have an opportunity to object. Moreover, the Center’s legal representative at the April 23 hearing was not given the opportunity to address the court. If there had been notice and an opportunity to be heard, this Court might now be reviewing a record of the trial Court’s reasoning, sharpened by adversarial challenge, and any factual support for its conclusions. The government bears the burden of proof, and “must demonstrate a compelling need to exclude the public … the mere utterance by trial counsel is not sufficient.” United States v. Hershey, 20 M.J. 433, 436 (C.M.A. 1985). Here, there is no evidence that the government met this heavy burden…



15 Comments

Can we see that letter and the full list of signatories? It sounds like a great thing.
Here’s the letter of support mentioned in the post.
It was just delivered to the Ecuadorean Embassy in London.
Saw tweets saying that 10K letters in support of asylum for Assange were received by the Ecuadorian Embassy. Kewl.
Superb reporting, as well as exceptional acts of courage and conviction, pursuant to the discovery of truth and underscoring the necessity of actual accountability, even in a purported “democracy”, Kevin.
It is very much appreciated.
DW
Fascism.
4 out of 14! The stench is rancid? Where is the disinfectant Judge!!!
I’m glad to see the defense winning little victories here and there, but I have no doubt that the verdict is already in and it’s guilty on all charges. Life in the stockade looms, if not a death sentence.
After all, they can’t have a truly convincing case against Assange unless they get Manning to fabricate some evidence in return for a reduced sentence.
That may be so, but I do not subscribe to leftist defeatism.
I don’t see it as defeatism but merely mention of how far our gov’t will go to turn justice on its head.
And thanks to you and others who are chronicling this kangaroo court as best you can give the restrictions. Someday this may be looked back at like the Trial of Billy Mitchell. (If you haven’t seen it, heckuva film, about a real case. Lt. Col. Mitchell — an early proponent of naval aerial power — was court-martialed for predicting that the Japanese would attack us in the Pacific.)
I guess it depends on what you do in response to the reality that the US government wants to make an example out of him.
If you respond with passivity, that’s what the US government is counting on from the American people. Passivity, indifference & apathy.
If you respond with action and interest, it is not a guarantee that the government will succeed in convicting him of “aiding the enemy” or being a traitor to America.
One might have said there was no way supporters would stir up enough controversy so Manning would be moved from Quantico but he was moved to Leavenworth. Now, he is not in the kind of cruel and inhumane conditions he was in for months before he went to Leavenworth.
It is possible for supporters to disrupt the agenda being pursued by the government and military.
That’s why reflexive, unthinking, blanket cynicism drives me crazy: Far too often, it’s the refuge of the lazy thinker and lazy person in general whose conscience still has the occasional twinge and so is looking for an excuse that will satisfy the conscience without actually committing to an action.
Definitely right about the public protests improving Manning’s confinement conditions. Also correct that the agenda can be disrupted. I just think that there is so much riding on this case (meaning getting Assange) that a gov’t that will assassinate citizens without trial and imprison those labeled “terrorists” indefinitely without charge is not likely to let this case slip through its fingers.
Well, I think I know one possible answer to lazy thinking for us lazy people: just vote for more and better Dems. You know, like Pelosi, Durbin, Reid, Kerry, Schumer, Hoyer, DiFi, Shitrod Brown, etc. Right? I mean, look how far we’ve come doing this for the past three decades. Awesome.
And don’t forget to vote to re-elect the fascist prick in the WH.
never mind
Eeps. Missed that. Thank you.
Absolutely!