
Courtroom sketch by Clark Stoeckley
UPDATE – 9:00 PM EST Jeff Paterson of the Bradley Manning Support Network sends me this message, which suggests the three people in the sketch above are from the State Department:”It is my understanding that the three people in question represent the State Dept., and were on hand to (primarily) argue that the State Dept.–particularly their bosses–should not have to testify at the court martial.” That makes sense. The government was pushing to halt the provision of discovery evidence to the defense on behalf of the State Department. They were trying to serve as gatekeepers who protected the State Department’s records from seeing sunlight.
If the three work for the State Department, why were they at the courthouse? Perhaps, they are lawyers and they are doing some regular work with the attorneys involved in the grand jury investigation?
Original Post
Three individuals, who military public affairs have informed media are government employees, have been attending hearings for Pfc. Bradley Manning, the soldier accused of releasing classified information to WikiLeaks. They will not tell press what agency or department of government these individuals work for.
In court, they sit right behind the prosecution when they attend proceedings. The woman with the bleached blond hair is extremely tan. Multiple times she has engaged in disruptive conversation with soldiers who are there assisting military prosecutors with any tasks that must be done during proceedings (e.g. fetching copies of court decisions that could potentially influence the judge’s rulings on motions).
The three are always together. They confer with military prosecutors in a room that is just behind where media sit in the gallery. Who are these people?
The suspicion is that they are staff people involved with the WikiLeaks federal grand jury investigation that is based in Alexandria, Virginia. The woman is suspected to be Tracy McCormick. David House, who was ordered to testify before the grand jury, says the bleached blond woman is her. But, again, that identity has not been entirely confirmed.
Is her name Tracy McCormick? Is she involved in the WikiLeaks grand jury?
I attended former CIA agent John Kiriakou’s motion hearing this morning. He is being prosecuted under the Espionage Act by the Obama administration for allegedly releasing classified information to journalists that included the identities of a “covert CIA officer” and details on the role of “another CIA employee in classified activities.” He argues he is being selectively and vindictively prosecuted.
The hearing took place at the US District Court in the Eastern District of Virginia. I was standing outside the courthouse entrance talking to Kiriakou, Thomas Drake and Jesselyn Radack when I glanced over and saw two of the three alleged WikiLeaks grand jury staffers walking to a car. The two individuals I saw were the black haired woman and the red haired man.
I watched them get into their vehicle. It was parked alongside a security barrier in the middle of Mill Road. There were police cars also parked along this barrier. This barrier ran down the middle of the street outside the courthouse and seemed like a place where official employees might be authorized to park.
What were the chances that I would see them as I was standing outside chatting? Pretty slim.
The WikiLeaks grand jury has been convening at the Eastern District of Virginia courthouse. This is a major clue as to who these people are that have been attending hearings. If their identities can be entirely confirmed, this indicates the grand jury is engaged in close consultation with prosecutors working to convict Manning.
Who are these people? Are they connected or involved in the WikiLeaks grand jury investigation?



30 Comments

Next time you see them, ask for their biz cards and offer them yours.
If they are and Kevin follows your advice, that may be the last we see or hear of him (NDAA). If they are, couldn’t their participation be accomplished electronically from a distance so they wouldn’t risk identification?
The lack of comments on the Manning threads (a matter of national importance), compared to the Colorado “tragedy” (localized event) is surreal.
The Manning/WikiLeaks/whistleblower situation is the real tragedy facing this nation.
Seem like nice folks. Would they like to have tea? Stay on it. Thanks.
“tragedy”?
That’s how the shooting in Colorado is being described. It’s today’s only “news” event.
A camera would’ve been nice when you saw those two outside to document with. The public’s right to take photos in public is pretty unambiguous. They make excellent reporter’s tools at times. The license plate of the car they got into probably would’ve told more.
We don’t have any information on which to make intelligent comments. It’s all secrud, dontcha know.
Good suggestions.
Can’t you be arrested for taking pictures of police in some jurisdictions? I’m sure the PTB would be able to implement that practice wherever they feel it’s appropriate for the public to not be informed. Any objections would be countered by an executive order.
It’s all just a traveshamockery anyway. O already pronounced Manning guilty and Assange has been labeled a cyber-terrorist by Biden. The oligarchy has spoken. What else do the peasants need to know?
I’m also fond of sidling up to people who are talking and having a listen.
Sometimes you can find out the story of their lives from one sentence.
For example, a group of us were walking along the Hudson waterfront in Newburgh. A woman was talking on her cellphone. As I passed her, she said “Yes, we were surprised too.” I turned around & gave the 40ish woman a second look, and sure enough, she was pregnant.
There’s that.
One could take a masochistic pleasure in knowing how badly screwed Manning, Assange & the rest of us are.
Even the most dedicated masochist would object to the oppression that is rapidly becoming our reality. Never fear, the PTB will find a way to make it worse.
That’s just at home.
Abroad they’re working hard on WWIII.
Just finished reading biogeraphy of Asad, the father (author is Brit & that’s how he spells it). Lots that’s relevant to current situation in Syria.
But one subsidiary element I hadn’t really thought about is that U.S. PTB have been obsessed with terrissm since Reagan. Living, unaware, through those times, I thought of them as isolated incidents of not much importance.
How wrong I was.
Of course, PTB refused to recognize any legitimate grievances. And had plenty of time to figure out how to exploit them for their own purposes.
Like all the tragedies and disasters now playing out, PTB has been laying the groundwork for decades.
With the demise of the USSR and the “Red Menace”, it became necessary to manufacture an appropriate substitute to instill fear in the masses and accelerate the implementation of the security state. Looks like they picked a winner with “terrorism”. Yesterday on the Syria thread there were comments by people who refused to acknowledge the possibility that the US covert forces were meddling in Syria and other nations that have been targeted for regime change. That’s an attitude that I’d expect on HuffPost or DailyKos but not here. I guess I’m still naive at this late stage of life.
It wasn’t until I read Eduardo Galeano and Naomi Klein that I realized that the history I’d been taught in school was basically propaganda that never failed to justify the actions of USA, Inc.
Sounds like a line from “Butch Cassidy” on the ubiquitous Pinkerton agents: “Who are those guys?”
Stay on it Kevin. Your every post is a must read. Thanks!
I picked up on the terriss scarey scarey boogga boogga has replaced the red menace scarey scarey boogga boogga several years ago.
What was new to me reading Asad was how much before the end of the red menace the terriss menace stuff started.
Of course, the PTB have a lot more reason to be afraid of terrissm than communism, bc the former can’t be fought with big powerful militaries with huge stupid weapons. And the PTB are much more targets than 99ers in that kind of warfare, as witnessed in Syrian assassinations.
I think I was on that thread for awhile. It is totally clear to me that, unlike Asad pere’s fight against the Muslim Brotherhood uprising in late 70s, early 80s, which he put down with force, almost all of current troubles come from U.S.-Israel-Qatar-Turkey-Saudis.
Hillary & Susan have made no secret of the lengths they are willing to go to get rid of Assad & create chaos in Syria.
Assad fils (subject to more info on my part) has been relatively benign ruler who kept very diverse fractions of Syria together without being too oppressive. Which, on the scale of all leaders of all countries in the past century+, ranks him pretty high.
But I agree with you. Alla sudden propaganda works & Assad must go. And everyone in U.S. just falls into line.
Love the Pinkerton analogy. Link for those unfamiliar with the history.
Scott Horton is fond of saying for Americans, history began yesterday.
Makes you burst with pride to be an American, doesn’t it? Of course our concerns are humanitarian and democratic in nature. How could anyone argue with that? Can’t allow Assad fils to rule a nation that is largely secular and religiously tolerant, especially when it’s an ally of the Demon Iran.
One of the new things I learned from reading Blum’s Killing Hope (short history of 50+ U.S. military international interventions post-WWII, ALL of which were disasters for 99ers in those countries) is that the BIG FEAR of U.S. PTB is that one or two of the countries that take control of their own destinies should turn out to be a success.
Thus Honduras, Paraguay elections had to be reversed with soft coups.
Gearing up for a second try at Venezuela. And Bolivia, Ecuador (whose side is Assange really on?).
WRT Brazil, I have, without evidence,* really bad vibes about Dilma Roussef.
*Govt list of pregnant women?! WTF is that all about.
Didn’t take long before the coup in Paraguay. That is after all the site of the Bush compound and a populist leader would be intolerable. I do hope the Latin American nations you reference are able to withstand the US assault.
I share your concern in.re. Roussef. Seems she hasn’t sided with the indigenous peoples of the Amazon basin and prefers to ally herself with the corporatists. For a victim of torture at the hands of the PTB, her record has been a disappointment, to say the least.
Gotta sign off and tend to mowing the lawn. The more I know, the greater my frustration. Take care.
Involvement by a grand jury is a good thing AFAIK. These are ordinary citizens who have agreed to be government overseers for a limited time. Not sure what that amounts to at the federal level, but locally here it is one year. They have the power to look into corruption including that of judges. Indictments at the local level (county) is just a small portion of what a grand jury does. This investigation into corruption or other misuses of government takes up most of their time. That doesn’t mean the grand jury would be sympathetic to Manning or that a good outcome is guaranteed, but it is not bad news in my eyes. Of course, they cannot discuss ongoing investigations, but if federal mirrors local, they do publish a report once per year on their findings and they can recommend prosecutions of government officials based on evidence they uncover.
Agree but I did not have phone on me at the time because no electronic devices are allowed in the Eastern District courthouse.
Can’t find much on Tracy McCormick – not even a bio.
What’s known about her?
“the BIG FEAR of U.S. PTB is that one or two of the countries that take control of their own destinies should turn out to be a success.”
Guess Iceland had better watch out.
The 1% working on WWIII reminds me of a quote from “Gangs of New York” movie:
“BOSS TWEED: Oh, I think he can. Whether it’s one man against another or a mob against the city, the mathematics remain the same. You never enjoyed the enlightenment of poverty, did you, Governor? If you had, you’d know you can always hire half the poor to kill the other half.:
You’d have to look at how many people read beyond the fold. Most of us probably feel we don’t have anything useful to add.
How is one supposed to know that people in civvies are police? Do they stop you and say, “No photos of us please, we’re undercover!”?
Anyway, the right of citizens to take photos in public spaces is well established in law. Plus with modern phone cameras there’s really no way to definitively know whether someone is taking photos or just SMSing or mucking about with the settings if done with a modicum of stealth.