A “Daily Show” clip with correspondent Jason Jones aired last night on “super spy” Thomas Drake, who worked for the National Security Agency as an analyst until he was ultimately charged as “a spy” under the Espionage Act for blowing the whistle on the NSA. The segment nicely plays up the fact he did not commit espionage and, instead, was a “cost-benefit analysis expert,” who had examined two intelligence gathering programs and decided one was cheaper and would lead to less fraud, waste, abuse and illegalities.
Jones introduces the two programs by saying ThinThread was an “efficient $4 million program” and Trailblazer was a $3 billion program that “didn’t quite work, spied on Americans and was quite a bit more expensive.”
Drake leads Jones through the act he committed describing why the government decided to prosecute him. Jesselyn Radack, a lawyer for Drake and National Security & Human Rights Director at the Government Accountability Project, appears in the segment with Drake and gets in a good line before the segment concludes.
What’s shown basically affirms what Jon Stewart says in the introduction, ”When it’s information the Obama administration no likey, they’ve been sonsofbitches on government whistleblowers.” And it ran right after Stewart skewered former New York Times columnist Judith Miller for going on Fox News to rail against Obama administration “leaks.” [Here's that segment, which made for a great lead-in to the segment with Drake.]
These two segments aired in the first ten minutes of the program last night, the opening of the show. It gave Americans a flavor of the hypocrisy driving “leak hysteria” and the Obama administration’s war on whistleblowing. Few Americans are likely familiar with Drake—and they should be—so the “Daily Show” engaged in a kind of public service by choosing to satirize his case.



12 Comments

“….information that could have prevented nine eleven…”
heh…yea right.
This is what has become SOP when you reveal the corruption of the Corporatocracy running the country. You can’t disrupt the cash flow or you will be destroyed.
This reminds me of the “15 Million Merits” episode of Black Mirror.
Ho ho ho. Shit is fucked up. Ho ho ho.
“It’s Miller Time!”
Thank you, Kevin.
Thank you, Jon Stewart!
Weakly leaky, double speaky.
Drake’s dilemma certainly needs more exposure.
While anonymity “protects” the sociopaths …
The only protection the rest of us have is sufficient notoriety that we can’t be disappeared … as “they” are trying to do to Thomas Drake.
DW
The government pretty much failed to have their way with Drake. Now, they must deal with a former NSA analyst who has been radicalized as a result of their retaliation against him for reporting on agency misconduct.
Ho ho ho. John Stewart disappears his angst quite well. Welcome to your new Comedy Security State.
(We know thinks about you that you can’t tell yo momma. It’s a gas.)
Excellent article! For more documentation that going after whistleblowers is a bipartisan activity see Whistleblowers – http://newprogs.org/blog/2011/11/09/whistleblowers-under-democraticrepublican-uni-party
One hopes that you might sometime have occasion to speak with Thomas Drake, Kevin, as it is likely he would support those pushing back against NDAA and possibly even be willing to offer some encouragement to Bradley Manning.
I greatly appreciate ALL the MANY things you are doing, Kevin.
Your posts are always “must-reads”, even if I’ve not the time to adequately respond in the comments.
When I’m talking with younger folks, your name is one I always mention when recommending taking a look at FDL.
You deserve as large an audience as possible … as it is to everyone’s benefit that your ideas and perspectives be heard and considered.
DW
Exactly. The corrupt insiders couldn’t let Drake upset their gravy train.
Wikipedia on the Trailblazer Project:
Wikipedia on SAIC:
Damn, where’s a true believer to go? Democracy Now? The Daily Show?
“Shit is fucked up.” C’mon John, can’t you be fucking serious?
I can’t get me no satisfaction. No no no.
RT television regularly airs segments with Drake. I just heard one such segment on RT just a few minutes ago.
I don’t see how this particular attack on a whistleblower can be ascribed to the Obama administration when it all occurred between 2000 and 2007. The event in 2010 was a finding return by a grand jury.
See Wikipedia: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Thomas_Andrews_Drake