
(Flickr Photo by Jared Rodriguez / t r u t h o u t; Adapted: jeditrilobite, david.evenson)
A recently released report from the International Human Rights and Conflict Resolution Clinic of Stanford Law School and the Global Justice Clinic at the New York University School of Law explores what it is like to live under drones and features firsthand testimony from civilians in Pakistan. The report, called “Living Under Drones,” is the product of two investigation missions to Pakistan and features firsthand accounts from those who have been impacted by drones employed regularly by the United States.
Part 1 on what the report details on strikes against rescuers and funerals was already published here at Firedoglake. Now, here’s Part 2, which examines drone surveillance, the effect that the presence of drones in the sky has on the mental health of Pakistanis and how drones breed distrust in Pakistani communities.
*
The constant presence of drones in the sky brings terror to the lives of the people of Pakistan. It is “harrowing” for children, grown-ups, women, and anyone who hears the sound of a drone and thinks they will be next. And in some respects, surveillance by drones is even worse than drone strikes because Pakistanis do not ever know for certain that a drone in the sky is just overhead to spy.
A humanitarian worker explained:
Do you remember 9/11? Do you remember what it felt like right after? I was in New York on 9/11. I remember people crying in the streets. People were afraid about what might happen next. People didn’t know if there would be another attack. There was tension in the air. This is what it is like. It is a continuous tension, a feeling of continuous uneasiness. We are scared. You wake up with a start to every noise.
One person told researchers, “God knows whether they’ll strike us again or not. But they’re always surveying us, they’re always over us, and you never know when they’re going to strike and attack.” Another interviewee who lost both his legs in a drone attack said that, “[E]veryone is scared all the time. When we’re sitting together to have a meeting, we’re scared there might be a strike. When you can hear the drone circling in the sky, you think it might strike you. We’re always scared. We always have this fear in our head.”
The fear makes anyone and everyone afraid of social gatherings. It makes people reclusive and afraid to leave their homes. As one man, who lost a cousin in a major drone strike on March 17, 2011, said:
We do not come out of our villages because it’s very dangerous to go out anywhere. . . . In past we used to participate in activities like wedding gatherings [and] different kinds of jirgas, different kinds of funerals. . . .We used to go to different houses for condolences, and there were all kinds of activities in the past and we used to participate. But now it’s a risk to go to any place or participate in any activities.”
As Umar Ashraf was being interviewed for the report, he gestured at the small group interviewing him and said, “We do not sit like this, like friends.” This does not happen anymore because people are afraid, “since [they] usually attack people when they sit in gatherings.”
“The Drones Are All Over My Brain”
Anticipatory anxiety and post-traumatic stress disorder occurs as a result of the terror Pakistanis experience from drones in the sky. The presence causes “emotional breakdowns.” It leads people to run indoors and hide whenever drones are overhead. It makes people faint, causes nightmares, “hyper startled reactions to loud noises, outbursts of anger or irritability” and sometimes even loss of appetite. It makes people insomniacs too.
“Drones are always on my mind,” a father of three told researchers. “It makes it difficult to sleep. They are like a mosquito. Even when you don’t see them, you know they are there.”
Saeed Yayha was injured by “flying shrapnel” in a major drone strike on March 17, 2011. He must rely on charity to survive. And, for him, drones are like demons or ghosts in the night:
I can’t sleep at night because when the drones are there . . . I hear them making that sound, that noise. The drones are all over my brain, I can’t sleep. When I hear the drones making that drone sound, I just turn on the light and sit there looking at the light.
There are Pakistanis, who do not eat when drones are flying overhead. Ajmal Bashir, “an elderly man who has lost both relatives and friends to strikes, told researchers, “Every person—women, children, elders—they are all frightened and afraid of the drones…[W]hen [drones] are flying, they don’t like to eat anything.” Another man said, “We don’t eat properly on those days [when strikes occur] because we know an innocent Muslim was killed. We are all unhappy and afraid.”
Doctors have treated PTSD. In one case, a female patient from Waziristan had “shaking fits” and “was screaming and crying.” The psychiatrist discovered the woman had observed a drone attack that happened near her home. “She had witnessed a home being destroyed—it was just a nearby home, [her] neighbor’s.”
For children, the fear and stress can be just as profound. Noor Behram, a Waziri journalist who has investigated and photographed the sites of drone attacks, noted, “If you bang a door, they’ll scream and drop like something bad is going to happen.” This sort of psychological trauma in a child could have “long-term ramifications,” one Pakistani mental health professional explained:
The biggest concern I have as a [mental health professional] is that when the children grow up, the kinds of images they will have with them, it is going to have a lot of consequences. You can imagine the impact it has on personality development. People who have experienced such things, they don’t trust people; they have anger, desire for revenge . . . So when you have these young boys and girls growing up with these impressions, it causes permanent scarring and damage.
Drone strikes could very well radicalize these children and inspire them to take up arms against America when they are grown up. They might engage in what the US would consider to be terrorism
Children growing up and engaging in terrorism is a definite recipe for perpetual war.
On top of all this, the communities in North Waziristan do not handle mental illness well. There are only a limited number of “trained mental health professionals” and health infrastructure is poor, which “exacerbates the symptoms and illnesses” Pakistanis experience. Communities also have rather disturbing ways of handling mental illnesses caused by drone strikes.
“Some people have been tied in their houses,” one man said. There are some, a man from Datta Khel—“which has been hit by drone strikes over three dozen times in the last three years alone”—who are “locked in a room.” Others take tranquilizers to “save them from the terror of the drones” or prescription drugs that may barely soothe the pain.
The CIA Has Informants Planting “Chips”
There is a great impact on community trust, according to the report. A number of Waziris happen to believe “paid informants help the CIA identify potential targets.” Additionally compounding the already-dystopian nightmare that is the US drone war, many Waziris believe these informants are planting “chips” or “sims” in vehicles or houses that are to be targeted by CIA drones.
Najeeb Saaqib explained to researchers how he thought these “chips” were working:
I think there are some other intelligence agencies, foreign intelligence agencies, also working there in the shape of our own people. They grow a large beard and take the same positions as our own people, working for those external agencies. They put a chip or something else in places, and then a drone strikes those places. That’s what we think.
In 2009, “chips” were reported by Declan Wash for The Guardian. The report noted the US had launched more than fifty drone attacks in Waziristan in the previous eighteen months and “nine of the top twetny al Qaeda figures” had been killed. The success was attributed to “chips” or electronic devices Pakistanis called “pathrai” (the Pashto word for a metal device), which had “become a source of fear, intrigue and fascination.” Residents and Taliban propaganda were suggesting the CIA was paying “tribesmen to plant the electronic devices near farmhouses sheltering al Qaeda and Taliban commanders.” But, at no point during the investigation missions were researchers able to find evidence of these “chips.”
This belief that “chips” are being planted by “informants” has created much mistrust, “as neighbors suspect neighbors of spying for the US, Pakistani or Taliban intelligence and of using drone strikes to settle feuds.”
One resident of a community impacted by drones asserted, “People have internal enemies and conflicts with each other. [T]o get revenge [on] another party, they put chips on that house.” This signals the house is a target. And, because someone can make your house a target at anytime by planting these “chips,” communities are constantly alert and “suspicious of outsiders” or any strangers, who come into their villages.
Part 3 on how drone strikes bring economic hardship and poverty to families and communities in Pakistan will be posted in the middle of the day on Tuesday, September 25.



31 Comments

It sounds like the drones are doing their job just fine… and U.S. skies are next.
US is using terror methods. The induction of PTSD and chronic anxiety in a population via terror that can strike at any time, and buzzing you with its intent, or constant in the field of vision (if one looks up), is terribly debilitating. It amounts to a constant assault on the sensorium of the human being. No doubt somewhere they’ve studied this. Their psychologists do that kind of thing.
Pure evil, and that the population of the US allows this, or even cheers it on, is disgusting.
No Doubt. Perhaps the population of the US has already been terrorized itself (I do not imply an equivalence to droning) and thus exports it’s terror.
They don’t have the courage to reject their own terrorizing. I wonder if they take comfort that the terrorizing can always be worse.
Bushit was “underestimating” us when he demagogued a crusade on Islam. The perpetual war is a war on humanity.
This myth the terrorizers probably encourage.
Well said … and, from my perspective, an excellent “handle” on the truth, Ludwig.
Only a nation, terrorized itself BY its own so-called “leadership”, could embrace raining terror down on others.
DW
The real sick story here is how many Exceptional Amerikans think the Drone Wars are cool even some here at the Lake.
This might be a good place and time to link to Tom Engelhardt’s diary of today:
http://my.firedoglake.com/tomengelhardt/2012/09/25/andrew-bacevich-even-dumb-ideas-have-consequences/#comment-264562
It is very much worth a read and serious consideration.
Thank you, Kevin, for this series, and I hope that readers will seek out the other posts in the series.
DW
but really. REALLY, they are rioting because of some fake movie trailer on yourtube…. it has nothing to do with drones….
“It takes allot of brass….” Obama just spoke at U.N. and called for end to violence against exercise of free speech.
Do not ask for whom the drone trolls; it trolls for thee. State sponsored Capitalism is Fascism.
This diary by Mikasi, is also worth a few minutes of your time, to further understanding.
http://my.firedoglake.com/mikasi/2012/09/25/what-is-a-drone/#recommend-3-51245
DW
Puppet Bush’s major contribution to our terror legacy was shock and awe.
Puppet Obomba’s is the US’s modern day equivalent to the German V2 missiles, drones.
Whoever named them reapers got it exactly backwards, we’re sowing seeds of hatred. What a fucked up identity the US has.
Are our V2 s morally superior to German V2 s ? How so ?
German V2′s killed indescriminantly and ours only kill “suspected” terrorists and collateral damage kills (which just can’t be helped if we are gonna keep Grammie safe in Peoria). If that is morally superior or inferior I’ll let others decide but it seems to be closer to a distinction without a difference.
Just check out Obama’s new drone
“In The Land Of The Free” it’s flown
Nothing will save
“The Home Of The Brave”
Tyrannical forces have grown
The Limerick King
http://www.flickr.com/photos/expd/7599092190/
I’m not sure that most Americans get that just flying a bomber OVER a place is terrorism. People in Grenada have told me that their now grown-up children still suffer nightmares and sweats recalling our bombing of St. George’s in 1983.
My mother, who grew up in Nazi Germany, remembers running through a field and being buzzed by US bombers returning from Dresden toward the end of the war. Air Force pilots sometimes dumped unused bombs in the countryside on their return runs, and Germans were terrified of this. My mother described it as the most frightening experience of her life.
Now think of “shock and awe” in Baghadad in 2003; this is American ugly written very very large.
I remember when robotic drones keeping watch over civilian populations and killing people at will was the sole province of cartoon supervillains and invaders from Mars. Guess I’m showing my age.
Well, I guess the V2′s were developed as a retaliation against the UK’s agressive bombing, but on the other hand, the rockets were built with starved prisoner labor. Our’s are designed, built and piloted by jingoists who believe the best “defense” is a “good” offense.
The germans aimed theirs at population centers, but we aim second rounds at rescuers.
I don’t know, seems like a toss up.
I hold, and have said, for a number of years, that the use of drones and the use of V2 rockets is morally equivalent, that no meaningful “distinction”, in ANY rational and reasonable human terms “separates” or distinguishes the actual “results” as “different”, between them, on the Terrorist Scale, BS, and I suspect that tjbs is saying precisely that, as well, and inviting others to ponder THAT truth.
In fact, each and every citizen of this nation ought to seriously begin, now, to ponder their personal relationship to truth and humanity from the “prospect” of, one day, being on the “receiving” end …
Honest and true “empathy” requires nothing less. As does honest, engaged, understanding.
Especially when this killing, this technological terrorism, let us not mince words, is DONE in the name of each and every one of us …
It is not just Obama who bears “responsibility” … it is all of the rest of “us”, as well.
DW
Exactly and why I can’t vote for O as the lesser of two evils as it is a miniscule difference. Stein/Honkala and all third party down ticket 2012 and beyond.
If these weren’t actual people whose dignity and humanity are being wholly violated, I would have described what I was reading as something out of a B movie.
“Drones are all over my brain.” Like something out of a creature feature at the drive-in.
I would say most B movies were made by rich people who have no talent and it’s a good analogy because our Country seems to be run by rich people who have no humanity.
V1s, not V2s. V2s were silent until the explosion, and much less in quantity.
Ralph Nader is quoted in Politico today calling Obama a “war criminal” for his use of drones. Not sure how you read about the practice of “double tapping” and not conclude the same thing. The comment section to the article is about what you would expect; both Democrats and Republicans agree that Nader is an idiot for criticizing the use of drones and disagree only on whether Nader is useful or harmful for political purposes.
Thanks Kevin. This policy is an essential element in maintaining control of the domestic population while ensuring that an enemy exists to perpetuate the argument for a bloated MIC and perpetual war. It was necessary to replace the threat of the Soviet Union and the Red Scare.The Cold War has been replaced with the Muslim Menace.
The TV program Dark Angel(James Cameron) portrayed the utilization of drones with facial recognition software for eliminating domestic targets by the PTB.
Coming soon to your neighborhood courtesy of the Obama administration.
That appears to be the limit of any public argument over the drone program.
The concept that we should oppose Drones because they might be used against us just shows how self centered and egotistical we Amerikans are.
If you use this logic then you can support Drone use against the Other if we aren’t threatened.
The use and support of Drones shows how shallow and visous we as a people are.
Sorry to inform you of this, but W was misquoted when he supposedly declared a “War on Terror”. What he actually called for was a “War on Terra”.
…X 2
…noted…Ds doing it too? imagine that…
you need to read how blaming the film is just another lie of the Obama administration. http://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree/2012/sep/20/obama-officials-spin-benghazi-attack