
Radio Dispatch program's logo
The United States is in the final month of election madness. There has been much discussion here about liberals, progressives or the left and Obama and how liberals react to the inclusion of third party candidates in elections. The Dissenter will continue to cover delusions among liberals about this election.
Last week, I wrote about the illusion of democracy in the 2012 election. I went on the excellent radio program, Radio Dispatch, with hosts John Knefel and Molly Knefel and discussed the post. Particularly, I highlighted how the run of Ralph Nader in the 2000 Election has been transformed into an impediment to discussions and efforts to further democratize elections. I also talked about what I called the “Five Stages of Support for Obama.”
The program can be listened to here or here. My segment begins around the 11-minute mark.
Both Molly and John had some excellent questions for me during my appearance. They gave me ample amount of time to share my views as well.
John asked me about Obama’s personality. He said Obama has become known as the “Trust Me” president and that has allowed for infringements of civil liberties that progressives tolerate and celebrate because of trust invested in him and added this is “fundamentally anti-democratic in a disturbing way” and he thought it had been a troubling trend.
I gave a complete reaction and addressed the reality that I am a person of white privilege. Then, I made clear my belief that the folks over at Black Agenda Report really are on to something. I did not mention this specifically, but, as Glen Ford, Executive Editor of BAR has stated, he is and has been the more effective evil, able to institute atrocious policies domestically and abroad, which George W. Bush would not have been able to institute if he had tried to do so as president. Obama has been able to do this under cover of the label “First Black President.” And, I noted various issues that have gone tremendously ignored in African-American communities, such as mass incarceration, segregation in schools and austerity measures that further contribute to poverty and unemployment.
One myth promoted by liberals is that people who vote third party are able to do so because they are privileged. They are doing it because they can and there will be no impact to them socially if it “spoiled” the election of the Democrat and the Republican happened to win.
I addressed the myth:
…If you think about the struggles between low-wage farm workers against their owners, if you think the strikers in the Walmart warehouses and you think about their masters, their owners, you think their people who are dictating the conditions, which they work in—Those [owners] are actually counting on those low-wage workers and those warehouse workers not questioning those conditions, not rising up because they’re going to put their job at risk and they’re going to be cast out. Or, they’re not going to be able to continue working because they decided to raise a fuss. So, they’re saying you wouldn’t resist what we do to you because you know you are going to be on your own. But, if you talk to a lot of those workers who have decided to rise up, like the people who just negotiated a fair food contract with Chipotle, you see that they’re tremendously empowered by not letting those conditions dictate how they engage in resistance.
And, I would say that is almost analogous to us. In some cases, we are slaves to the two-party system and continue to submit to its conditions and the fact that we continue to do so is because we have been led to believe that there is nothing we can do besides play inside the box and so, if we step outside the box, we’re going to be in trouble, we’re going to lose. But I would say that is a short term issue, that we are thinking about it all in the short-term. You might actually stand to gain much more in the long term by stepping outside…
Molly read an exceptional piece of listener mail at the end of the hour program that tied into much of what I had said during my segment:
First, I am a white man that has experienced privilege and used it to survive. I know that. Second, I have loved and supported a dear woman for forty-two years, who has put all her strength into fighting for vulnerable women—everything from a food co-op to a rape crisis center to research of non-English speaking women and healthcare.
She and I are in agreement. We have had it with voting for the evil of two lessers and we won’t do it again. Every leader we knew in our youth—Martin Luther King, Jr, John and Robert Kennedy, Mark Clark and Fred Hamptom, draftees from our community to Vietnam, tens of leaders from the Black Panther Party (the real one), students at Kent State and Jackson State—were killed when we were young. Going into electoral politics was not an option. We felt our lives were at risk just speaking out and all our energy went to surviving and keeping the work going.
I personally spoke out against the war while in uniform, fully expecting to spend my life in prison. The massive resistance to the war saved my white neck. At a point, however, despite the oppressive violence, things eased a bit and we felt we had won a space to go into electoral politics and build a progressive base. We were wrong. Obama’s a good example of the failure. He first ran trying to unseat a former Panther leader, who was on the Chicago City Council, Bobby Rush. He lost and I forgot Obama did that. Stupid me.
Obama has continued Republican foreign policy and is prepared to compromise on domestic issues to a degree that is really terrifying. He has appointed women to the Supreme Court, who will—I am sure—vote to limit Roe v. Wade when the time comes. He has put into place a healthcare system that will do absolutely nothing to quell the bankruptcies of families swamped by healthcare costs. I have personal experience with this, as my brother recently successfully went into bankruptcy over healthcare costs. Obama’s ACA will soon enough become swamped with uninsured people and raising costs and we will have to fight tooth and nail for the thirty or so million left out by the system.
Essentially, our experience is that we should not delude ourselves into thinking that one man can protect our lives from above. Obama is just a man and a relatively weak one. If we don’t have organized people from below, we are fucked.
Now the question is, should we vote for Obama in the short-term because he can in the short run protect what rights we have won and give us time to further organize? Our answer: no. Obama is going to sell us out. We are going to war with Iran, no doubt about it, and it is going to take us down a path of horrific violence and oppression. So, we are not voting for the bastard again.
Like the hosts said, this listener does not mince words and it provides a context to help people hopefully understand that people on the left were once getting killed. The stakes seem a bit lower now, which is all the more reason to stand up and fight for what is right.
*
John praised Firedoglake as “one of the most reliable sources for information that is very, very critical of the Democratic Party and very, very much to the left of the Democratic Party. They were an indispensable source for information during the health care debate and continue to be indispensable, especially with drone stuff that has been happening.”
The praise should be returned. So, I want all who read this to know that these two people put a lot of thought and work into producing their one-hour radio program. They always are discussing subjects that should be hot topics not just among progressives but among all citizens. And they a display a great journalistic commitment to question conventional wisdom and fully explore the nuances of subjects so listeners have a more complete understanding of issues.
After my segment, Molly said she thought it was important what was raised about Obama’s campaign and how it informs conversation amongst people on the left or informs their perceptions of him. She said she wanted to further the conversation and get more voices involved in a discussion so, after listening to the program, I encourage all readers to send comments to radiodispatch[at]gmail[dot]com.
Again, the program can be listened to here. My segment begins around the 11-minute mark. And, if you enjoy the show, consider following Molly and John on Twitter at @mollyknefel and @johnknefel.



14 Comments

the lake may be far to the left of “the democratic party” but the proper perspective is that the lake is closer to the center on issues to the general public and “the democratic party” is corporate bought just like the republican party
the two party system has devolved into “all members are playing for the same team, making believe they are oposing each other”
the corporatists are winning plain and simple
I have 7 political signs in my yard for the upcoming election. Some people in the neighborhood depend on my signs to know who to vote for. One even complained when I didn’t put any up for the last election.
I don’t have an Obama sign. I can’t vote for him. He’s done too many things that I’m very angry about – environmental damage with Horizon and okaying deep water drilling after that and money and licensing for new nukes and extending aging nukes’ licenses.
But mostly I can’t vote for the more effective evil. I want habeas corpus back from Bush’s removal of it. Instead, my civil liberties are more in jeopardy than ever. I can be taken away in the night and assassinated as a terrorist with just Obama’s say so for almost anything I say or do that is not in agreement with the government/corporate agenda.
Thanks very much to both Kevin and the hosts (the Knefels). Yes, “very, very much to the left of the Democratic Party” may be something you could say about a majority of the American public, but that doesn’t mean it’s not praise.
I’ll take our plaudits where we can get them.
Yeah, we could talk about whether what I write is always or mostly left-wing. I like to think I am populist and just plain for the 99%. And some of my writing is railing against violations of civil liberties, which should not necessarily be regarded as ideological.
Speaking of Glen Ford, and I’m sure this has been posted before, it’s a good time to see his response to the election, which sounds much like the one above (the guy’s right about how everyone should have remembered Obama ran against Bobby Rush).
http://blackagendareport.com/content/why-black-man-watching-debates-and-voting-green
This article and the comments reminds of the people who voted for Ralph Nader in 2000. It’s a free country and everyone is entitled to vote their opinion. My view is different.
Far better to be thought of as a misogynistic racists than be delusional and support the corporate agenda. Just as you can’t tell a TeaBagger Obama’s not a Kenyan Socialist, you can’t tell a DPartier the reality of their party’s agenda, or get them to acknowlege the actions of their hero.
Keep up the good work Kevin.
Okay, you live in Oklahoma. I get it. It’s tough to live there and your vote in the presidential race probably won’t matter. But here’s a reality check on Obama and “support for the corporate agenda.” My uncle was the “abortion doctor” who was murdered in Florida. It is delusional, in my opinion, to think that a vote for Romney or a non-vote in the 2012 election will be good for women’s reproductive rights.
great work Kevin!
Let me make this perfectly clear, Obamabot, if I lived in Florida, Virginia, North Carolina, Pennsylvania, Ohio, New Mexico, or Nevada, I still wouldn’t support or vote for a candidate based on his branding and marketing, while his actions went against everything he ran on and issues I support. You will have to find a better salve for your rationalization than my vote doesn’t count, but yours is all important and your sell out is thus acceptable. Your uncle was a hero, and if you were really concerned about women’s reproductive rights, maybe you could find it within yourself to support politicians who would defend Roe v Wade rather than using it once every four years as a scare tactic to vote for sham politicians. The only time your party is serious about all such issues is when they are in opposition, and then they do as little as possible outside of rhetoric ( or did I miss it when Holder went after all those states for violating Federal Law?) Good luck with your further proof of Einstein’s theory of Insanity.
I <3 Glen Ford.
Heh, where were Democrats when they were outlawing partial birth and increasing the risk for a woman to have a preforated uterus? Where were Democrats on the conscience clause or during the health care debate when Stupak,a DEMOCRAT, offered up women’s reproductive rights? Oh that’s right they were either cowering in the corner or HELPING the Republican’s destroy women’s reproductive rights.
You actually illustrated the posted diary beautifully though. Women’s groups should not be providing cover to a party that allows their rights to be used as a bargaining chip. The lesser evilism needs to end.
Not to pile on or anything, and taking other people’s comments at face value, I agree with your premise that Obama has been anything but a champion for women’s reproductive rights. As a bargaining chip to help pass the ACA, Obama signed an executive order making the Hyde Amendment – which bans government funding of most abortions – into a permanent law when it had previously been subject to annual renewal. Jane Hamsher wrote a post about it here on FDL when it happened (link).
Yes, time for “electoral action” to become “direct action” for sure. Great work by both FDL and Radiodispatch.com.