
TransCanada destruction equipment in floodlights at night (Photo by Tar Sands Blockade)
In East Texas, TransCanada, a multinational energy corporation, has transformed property surrounding the easement it has control over for construction of the Keystone XL oil pipeline into a police state, according to the Tar Sands Blockade. Enlisted off-duty police officers are intimidating, harassing and arresting just about anyone they think is trespassing, even if those people happen to be on property they own. And, officers who are acting as armed henchmen for TransCanada have arrested three journalists in the past twenty-four hours for simply being there to report on resistance to the pipeline construction.
The Tar Sands Blockade has been resisting construction of the pipeline for sixteen days. The Blockade has a tree village and are up along a timber wall. They have materials and supplies so they can stand in the way of TransCanada’s attempts to destroy forest and land to build a pipeline for the distribution of tar sands oil. In the past week, police have surrounded the area preventing any supplies, like food or water, from getting to Blockaders. Though the Blockaders currently have what they need, they are isolated and the police have no interest in their health or well-being.
A “marquee journalist,” according to Tar Sands Blockade spokesperson Ron Seifert, was placed under arrest around 1:30 PM this afternoon. The journalist approached the right of way or easement on private property, where he had permission to be and did not get “within thirty or forty feet of the boundary before he was handcuffed” and told he was trespassing. Though he was released after a few phone calls and not fully arrested, it was emblematic of “the level of oppression” going on in and around the area. [UPDATE - 3:00 PM EST on October 11 - NPR reports the journalist handcuffed was with the New York Times and was with a photographer, who was also handcuffed.]
The police, some hours later, “sealed off all press access to the tree blockade.” Freedom of the press is now being completely obstructed, with police refusing to allow any press access to observe and report on the blockade.
Last night, Elizabeth (@occupymusician) and Lorenzo (@uneditedcamera), who are both live streamers, were arrested. The two had traveled to cover the Blockade as freelance journalists.
“They showed up about a week ago to cover the story,” said Seifert. “To be on the site to introduce the world” to the Blockaders and “what the tree village looks like across the timber wall.” And, to “augment their own reporting,” they climbed up to the top of the timber wall to do interviews.

Lorenzo and Elizabeth, two live streamers arrested (Photo by Tar Sands Blockade)
When they finished, they were told if they set foot on the ground they would be arrested for trespassing. They held out there for a full week, according to Seifert. They planned to come down each day and each day they realized they could not get down safely until finally they could not stay up in the trees any longer and had to come down.
Thanks to grassroots support, both have had trespassing charges against them dropped. Still, they spent a night in jail for being there to tell a story, for being there to report on resistance to the Keystone XL pipeline project.
Seifert detailed how totalitarian the scene has become:
…Make no mistake this is a police state. There are more police officer than there are citizens on this property at any given time. Anyone that gets within eye sight of police officers, that person is demanded to identify themselves, threatened with arrest if they fail to produce idea. Police have been marching around private property, not the space that TransCanada claims is theirs, not their own easement, but well beyond that space. Just around private property in general looking for people to arrest and harass…
Landowners, Seifert said, are having their land patrolled and residents that simply want to go from one side of their farm to another and are being told if they set foot on their own property they are going to be arrested.
An easement contract is right to use property that is not owned. It is like a telephone or gas company being able to walk on property to do maintenance (except in those cases the telephone and gas companies are not typically destroying land so they can put something in the ground that will likely pollute the environment around the property).
If telephone companies hired a patrol to rove around and round up people they did not want near them when they were doing maintenance, it would be outrageous. That is what TransCanada is doing, Seifert explained.
“A foreign corporation is saying this is our land. We get to decide who can and cannot be on it at all times,” Seifert outlined. “If you disagree with what we are doing, we’re going to have you arrested because we bought out the local police department and we’re paying them directly by the hour to work for us.”

Tree village (Photo by Tar Sands Blockade)
As described, TransCanada has found a supply of goons to chill dissent and spread fear around the area of construction so it can preserve the future of the pipeline. Payouts to police are funding the hours of time officers are spending engaged in this authoritarian conduct. While the police are not on-duty when they patrol, they are using taxpayer-bought police equipment and resources to illegally crack down on people:
…Off-duty police officers are being paid by TransCanada to do private security, however, they’re still wearing their police uniforms. They’re still using their police equipment. They still have their state-issued weapons and utilities about them. And they still have all their police resources and they’re still arresting people and acting as on-duty police officers. They’re pay check is coming from TransCanada. They’re equipment and their power is coming from the state and there is this collusion. These two things have comingled. It’s an alarming course of events. It’s not something you expect in America, that a multinational corporation would be paying police directly to do whatever it said. The police are being mandated by a foreign corporation to do what it says rather than to obey the law…
If someone is on an easement but not detracting from the company’s use of that piece of land they are supposed to be able to use, there is nothing illegal going on. A person can walk on the easement. In fact, right now, there is just a big dirt scar running through the middle of the forest until TransCanada takes the next step in its construction. There is no construction or workers. No people nearby can be said to be reasonably interfering with anything TransCanada is doing with the easement right now.
The Tar Sands Blockade has garnered wide support. Seifert said he has been impressed and humbled. There is a lot more work to do, but it is still possible for the Blockade and other Americans to stop the pipeline project. Larger push backs against TransCanada are in the works and there are a lot of opportunities for legal actions to be taken because TransCanada has engaged in illegal and fraudulent acts.

Photo by Tar Sands Blockade



12 Comments

Anyone know if it is true that the Granite Pipeline in Canada that was needed to get the tarsands to the U.S. XL pipeline has been blocked by the Canadians?
Bill McKibbon is going to sh*t a brick when Barack! green lights Keystone Pipeline upon reselection.
We have a banana republic legal system, now we have the goons to go with it.
The United States was built on exploitation of Black people and natural resources. What else is new? They are just picking up where they left off in 1932.
I think Bill knows that he is selling out. He completely backed off of Obama after it was clear that Obama supported the XL Pipeline and postponed all political action until “the first day after the election.” All of his writings go easy on Obama. For verification see Environment – http://newprogs.org/blog/2011/11/08/environment-under-democraticrepublican-uni-party
If it were not for government subsidies and tax breaks the oil industry could not afford any of this or the gas industry afford fracking.
First Thanks Kevin and then alright the taaaaar saaaaand flow, what the hell could go wrong. Aemirka in complete control of the so called govt. of the people. New world order, how sad for us on Main Street
I concur. Bill is at least as smart as I am. And I know what’s going to happen. It’s already happening.
And lest we forget, Oilbomber fast-tracked Shell for deep water drilling in the Arctic.
Shell would be at it right now, were it not for shoddy equipment and hurry-it-up greed. And the weather… But that will change….
McKibbon is selling out. Too bad.
Sign up to volunteer for Barack — that will get “things” started…
And remember to support Bradley Manning while you volunteer for Barack because Barack Obama had/has nothing to do with what is being done to Bradley Manning…
Barack Obama is since Jan.20,2009 just the D POTUS…volunteer for Barack…because after November Barack will then get things “started”…
Just shoot the Trans Canada goons, that’s what I would do. It’s Texas and you have the right to use force and deadly force on your own property.
Sec. 9.41. PROTECTION OF ONE’S OWN PROPERTY. (a) A person in lawful possession of land or tangible, movable property is justified in using force against another when and to the degree the actor reasonably believes the force is immediately necessary to prevent or terminate the other’s trespass on the land or unlawful interference with the property.
Sec. 9.42. DEADLY FORCE TO PROTECT PROPERTY. A person is justified in using deadly force against another to protect land or tangible, movable property:
(1) if he would be justified in using force against the other under Section 9.41; and
(2) when and to the degree he reasonably believes the deadly force is immediately necessary:
(A) to prevent the other’s imminent commission of arson, burglary, robbery, aggravated robbery, theft during the nighttime, or criminal mischief during the nighttime; or
(B) to prevent the other who is fleeing immediately after committing burglary, robbery, aggravated robbery, or theft during the nighttime from escaping with the property; and
(3) he reasonably believes that:
(A) the land or property cannot be protected or recovered by any other means; or
(B) the use of force other than deadly force to protect or recover the land or property would expose the actor or another to a substantial risk of death or serious bodily injury.
I heard a story about this from a property owner there on a program called ‘The Story’ on public radio a few weeks ago. Trans Canada wants to use a piece of her property for the pipeline, but she doesn’t want it, so she’s suing to prevent it. She had her case thrown out in a lower court. She says the problem is the law in Texas, which makes it easy for a company to claim a status that allows it to bypass private property rights. Basically, the company claims it’s a utility. The burden falls on the property owner to disprove the claim. She said she felt sorry for the local judge, who was under a lot of pressure from the ‘powers that be’ and who she said, probably doesn’t really understand the law. Now it’s under appeal and she’s hoping a higher appeals court panel will be able to hear her case and offer a fair decision. At one point she went out on a part of her property where people from the company were doing something, maybe surveying, and she told them politely that they were trespassing. She said they were also polite and that they left, at least for the time being.
In 2006, while I was in D.C. I went to the National Folk Festival on the Mall. Along with crafts and music there was a worlds fair class pavillion, multi-media presentation, 18-wheeler rig and lots of well dressed smiling people extolling the virtues of Canada’s shale extraction.
KXL has been working on this for a long time. Election’s almost over and they are ready for the green light. No matter who wins the election, the planet loses.